Comments
Posted by Doug on September 5 at 1:34 p.m.
Will you be printing the text of the McCain speech like you did for Obama so we can make our own assessment instead of your interpretation and telling us what to think, emphasizing what you like and cutting out what you don't?
Posted by jerry roberts on September 5 at 2:09 p.m.
Doug - link to text and video of speech is in the post above.
Posted by Doug on September 5 at 5:27 p.m.
Thanks - but we can't comment here from there :)
Posted by jerry roberts on September 6 at 8:41 a.m.
Doug - I'm not sure I understand your point, but I've posted a transcript of the speech for you on the RNC blog. Thanks for reading.
Posted by Doug on September 6 at 3:35 p.m.
Thank you! The point is that everyone is tired of commentary. We just want to hear what the guy said and make our own judgments. ABC couldn't stop interrupting the Leiberman and Fred Thompson speeches so their panel of commentators could tell us their spin on what we just heard and keeping us from hearing more.
I am not making accusations to you personally but commentators such as yourself are free to be selective and pick and choose from what was said and slant the meaning. We just want to hear everything and make our own decisions about things that were said and what we should think about it... anything else is propaganda and insulting to the intelligence. Thanks for doing that. At least your commentary can be read in the context of what was actually said.
I hated Ronald Reagan when I was in college. Only as an adult did I hear some of his actual speeches without the media censoring, selective, out of context excerpts and spin. The liberal media wanted us to hate him - portrayed him as a stupid actor that snoozed during cabinet meetings and I did.. When I read or heard his speeches as an adult I realized the man was truly awesome.
Posted by Chris on September 6 at 3:48 p.m.
In case you're blind to it - (which I doubt) here are some of your "spin" statements, designed to identify McCain with Bush in the minds of your readers, which is the obvious Democratic strategy.
We really can do with out it Jerry. If we want to make the association, or think it's important, we can do it without you, thanks. We aren't stupid sheep to be manipulated by propaganda- it is so obvious in the media today. Just give us the facts, please.
"offered a list of economic policies that differ little from those of President Bush"
"admitting government "lost the trust" of Americans under the Bush Administration"
McCain, who will never be confused as an orator with, well, Barack Obama, delivered his address in a pedestrian, if avuncular, voice
"generic Republican notions like cutting business taxes and government programs, or recycled Bush proposals"
Posted by binky on September 7 at 12:30 a.m.
Why should Jerry be obligated to intentionally ignore the incumbent and highest Republican in the land, simply because that would conform with the wishes of the RNC?
(Which is, of course, the very tactic they are pursuing -- pretending not to see Bush, and certainly not linking McCain in any way to the man they've been touting since 2001 as one of the greatest Presidents ever.)
It seems silly to not compare the policies of the desired heir-apparent of the RNC to the policies of the current White House occupant, the very office and man McCain hopes to replace. Shouldn't policy issues be compared, contrasted, and studied, in the interest of fact-based reporting?
I certainly prefer that to the gossip-laden, reporters-as-stenographers, "gotcha!," two-bit character dissection which substitutes for policy discussions in the popular press.
Previous Month

