A Primer on the Race for 2nd District Supervisor

Four candidates are vying for the county Board of Supervisors
seat being voluntarily vacated by Susan Rose as she finishes up
eight years representing the 2nd District. Embracing the great
unincorporated eastern Goleta Valley and large portions of the two
cities that flank it like bookends on either side, the 2nd District
also includes four Channel Islands — San Miguel, Santa Rosa, Santa
Cruz, and tiny Santa Barbara — and a swath of Los Padres National
Forest. Beginning in the east at the base of Hot Springs Road and
just tickling the bottom of Montecito, the district snakes along
the Santa Barbara waterfront, following the coastline to just
beyond Goleta Beach. Expanding northward it takes in the Old
Mission and West Camino Cielo before diving south along Fairview
Avenue. Within its borders are communities as diverse as Hope Ranch
and Painted Cave, but the focus of this race has been the
unincorporated eastern Goleta Valley. That is where the greatest
changes are likely to occur, and where the residents are most
divided.

Each of the contenders — Joe Guzzardi, Dan Secord, Das Williams,
and Janet Wolf — brings a distinctive approach to solving problems,
including the usual budget issues. The thorniest of these problems,
however, is the need for affordable housing on the one hand, and
the countervailing urgency on the other hand to protect open
space.

The Candidates

Of course, supervisors affect issues beyond their own districts.
The candidates’ positions on San Marcos Growers and More Mesa have
become emblematic of their interest in protecting the vast and
varied countryside of the Gaviota Coast, lying to the north in the
3rd District. While all four candidates describe themselves as
environmentalists — some more than others — placing a strong
environmentalist in the 2nd District seat, to keep company with 1st
District Supervisor Salud Carbajal, is something less than half the
battle. Two North County supervisors with a great deal of respect
for land development rights and no pronounced commitment to
preserving the Gaviota Coast still occupy the 4th District and 5th
District seats; with the 3rd District seat filled at least until
2008 by Brooks Firestone, a moderate with an inclination to veer
right. Clearly, this configuration complicates the role of the 2nd
District supervisor, who must be counted on to do more than simply
vote in the minority. What follows is an overview of the views of
each candidate, in alphabetical order.

The Issues

Budget Last month, the county accepted a report
from a team of five financial experts — the Blue Ribbon Budget Task
Force — which predicted that the budget would start dipping into
the red within the next five years due to rising healthcare and
pension costs. Its suggestions for increasing revenue ran the gamut
from the promotion of oil mining to auto malls and “village
centers,” stand-alone communities of about 2,500 people dotting the
rural landscape. Cost-cutting ideas included more job outsourcing
and “careful scrutiny” of programs that the county supports in
excess of minimum matching-funds requirements.

Wildland The largest single unprotected
wildland in the 2nd District is More Mesa, a birdwatcher’s paradise
located above a historically nude beach. The 300 acres of rugged
coastal blufftop has been the subject of preservation versus
development battles for more than a quarter century. Most of
it — 265 acres — is owned by the Sun Mesa Company, whose plan to
build hundreds of luxury homes on its residentially zoned land was
clipped back through a series of intense legal and political
battles to zoning for 70 homes on 40 acres, but it’s not over yet.
For one thing, the owner has litigation pending against the county
for reducing the zoning; and for another, the More Mesa
Preservation Coalition is intent on preserving the entire 300 acres
in perpetuity as a nature park.

Housing The Board of Supervisors has adopted a
state-mandated housing element committing them to dedicating space
for 1,235 affordable homes in the county’s unincorporated areas.
The supervisors agreed to rezone 62 acres for high-density housing,
though the particular acres have not yet been chosen. The 62 acres
will satisfy state mandates only through 2008.

Agricultural Land Many Goleta Valley residents
are up in arms over the distinct possibility that
farmland — especially along Hollister Avenue west of Turnpike
Road — will be rezoned for housing. Most of this land is leased by
farmers, many of whom grow organic fruits and vegetables. None of
the property owners are participating in the Williamson Act, which
offers tax relief in exchange for keeping land in agricultural use.
For the farmers, this is an ominous sign.

Joe Guzzardi Guzzardi believes the county
should disobey state housing mandates, which, according to him,
would create far more market-rate housing than affordable housing.
Regardless of whether they house the poor or the middle class,
high-density housing developments are particularly anathema to
Guzzardi, and he is alone among the candidates in failing to be
moved by arguments that the South Coast must house its “critical
work force.” He argues that commuting is a perfectly acceptable
choice for some workers, including firefighters and police.
Nonetheless, he has suggested that some firefighters could be
housed on county-owned or U.S. Forest Service property; and that
housing for teachers could be built on campuses, for example on the
second or third story of school buildings, above classrooms.

Guzzardi is also alone among the candidates in adamant
opposition to building high-density housing on the agriculturally
zoned, MTD-owned property at Highway 101 and Turnpike.
Affordable-housing advocates have zeroed in on these 17 acres,
which are not currently being farmed, as a low-income housing site.
The acreage’s most passionate champion is Steve Musick, who claims
he built up the soil so well as to have transformed at least five
of those “non-prime” acres to “prime” when he was farming them. To
this, Guzzardi adds that non-prime ag land can be used for
agricultural support industries. Guzzardi held the press conference
announcing his candidacy from the MTD site, with his rallying cry,
“Not another square foot of ag land zoned for development.”

Sometimes Guzzardi tacks on open space to that mantra. At the
forum moderated by the More Mesa Preservation Coaliton, Guzzardi
did not sound optimistic about purchasing the 70 acres now zoned
for development. “I wish I could wave a magic wand … but as a
realist I realize we’ll have a tough task to try to purchase it
from the developers.”

Guzzardi touts himself as a guardian of private-property rights;
his evidence is that he will not change current zoning — a stance
that would mostly defend existing ag land. As a member of the
Neighborhood Preservation Ordinance ad hoc steering committee, he
has battled fiercely to keep houses small in the City of Santa
Barbara, thwarting the desires of property owners who want to build
bigger homes.

Guzzardi dismissed as absurd the Blue Ribbon Budget Task Force’s
recommendations for generating tax revenues, seeing the county’s
insatiable hunger for revenue as part of a vicious cycle that
constantly demands more development. For that reason alone he is a
stringent fiscal conservative.

Born in 1954 and raised in a modest tract home in the San
Fernando Valley, where his mother still lives, Guzzardi attended a
parochial high school in Encino, then majored in natural resources
management at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo because he wanted to become
a professional forester. But eventually he learned carpentry,
building “big, beautiful homes in Pacific Palisades” and large
commercial projects in Santa Barbara. He then became a county
health inspectorw for 10 years until 1998, when he switched over to
the Office of Emergency Services, where he now does emergency
planning and acts as the liaison for Homeland Security,
coordinating pertinent agencies and distributing grants. He and his
wife, who works as a legal secretary in the Public Defender’s
office, have 12-year-old twins.

Dan Secord Secord is the only Republicanrunning
for the 2nd District seat, and although the office is nonpartisan,
it is also true that Secord’s sympathies for private developers are
more pronounced than those of any other candidate. During this
race, Secord has taken up the popular dictum, “We don’t need any
more million-dollar condos.” Yet during his two terms on the Santa
Barbara City Council, Secord stood fast against pressure to require
developers to include a greater percentage of affordable units in
their condo projects.

Secord was also the only candidate who did not participate in
the More Mesa Preservation Coalition’s forum, although he did show
up before the forum began to answer a few questions before leaving
for a sheriff’s campaign event in support of Jim Thomas. Despite
his acknowledgement that open space is “a boon to the soul,” he
must have figured that he’d already irretrievably lost the
wildlands vote, and besides, the forum took place on the More Mesa
property, in full view of the rather conspicuous Cape Cod-style
luxury home for which Secord helped clear the way when he was on
the California Coastal Commission. Secord said he would support
efforts to buy More Mesa, but would not “put the squeeze on the
developer” with more restrictive land-use policies.

Secord has also distinguished himself as the only candidate who
does not wholeheartedly support Measure D, insisting that he is not
against it but that he thinks it cannot pass. He wishes it had been
split into a simple renewal of the half-cent tax, with alternative
transit separated out as an additional quarter-cent tax. Because
Measure D needs a two-thirds majority to win, critics are
dumbfounded that he would use his candidate’s megaphone to cast
doubt on the measure, which, if it fails, will leave road
maintenance and added freeway lanes in the same sunken boat as the
bike lanes and commuter rail plans that he disdains.

Secord spoke favorably of rezoning agricultural lands for
housing development if they have sub-prime soils. That would apply
not only to the fallow MTD-owned property, but to several other
farms currently producing tons of produce and flowers on sub-prime
soils. Secord clearly rejected the notion of using public
funds — for example, transfer-of-development fees — to buy, and
then lease to farmers, agricultural lands that the owners find
unprofitable to continue in agriculture.

Secord does not by any means score a perfect
anti-environmentalist record. For example, he actively participated
in expanding the city’s recycling program, to extend the life of
the Tajigas landfill. “That landfill is going to last a long time,”
he joked at an early forum, “especially if we don’t put anything in
it.”

A budget deficit would inspire him to cut county spending,
Secord said, including “sacred cows” that he did not specify. He
said he favors enhancing the business climate by reducing the size
of government and easing up on taxes. Village centers throughout
the countryside are “probably something we are not going to do,”
Secord said, but he stopped short of disavowing auto malls. He is
more partial to high-tech startups by UCSB graduates, and other
well-paying jobs, than to industries employing low-wage
workers.

Secord said he approaches the 2nd District without any
particular ax to grind, just his fair judgments and his vast
experience in government and in life. Secord was born in a
Salvation Army orphanage in Kansas City, Kansas, and adopted nine
months later. An only child raised first in eastern Washington and
then in Redlands, California, Secord ran away at age 15. “They
didn’t know what they had,” he explained. He worked in the Army
Medical Corps in the late ’50s, put himself through college and
medical school, and came to Santa Barbara in 1969 from Los Angeles
with his present wife in the same red Mercedes two-seater
convertible that he still drives. He delivered about 5,000 babies
before retiring, and during the past 17 years has served on the
Santa Barbara Harbor Commission and the Planning Commission, in
addition to the Coastal Commission and, for the past eight years,
the Santa Barbara City Council. He has five grown children from two
marriages.

Das Williams Das Williams’s clarion call is
environmentalism. According to him, the most likely sources of
large grants to purchase More Mesa are the Coastal Conservancy and
the Wildlife Conservation. Adding more constraints to coastal bluff
development, he added, would decrease market value for public
acquisition. Examples of such constraints are stronger habitat
protection and visual resource policies, and maximum square-footage
for homes. Transferring development rights to other properties
could reserve still more of the acreage as wild parkland. Williams
vowed to pursue a combination of strategies in an effort to reduce
the number of houses “from 70 to zero.”

Williams expressed willingness to sacrifice the uncultivated
MTD-owned ag land at Turnpike and 101 to build low-income housing.
Rezoning conversion fees could then be exacted toward the purchase
of other endangered ag land, such as San Marcos Growers, which many
Goletans fear will be converted to infill housing.

Better than converting ag land, though, is replacing commercial
development, according to Williams. “Rezone La Cumbre Plaza,” he
said at one forum, “not San Marcos Growers.” Yet he led a City
Council majority to reject Barry Berkus’s high-density housing
development on upper State Street, which had been hailed by
“smart-growth” architects — smart growth meaning high-density,
mixed-use near transit corridors, a concept Williams embraces, as
distinguished from sprawl. Williams explained that the project had
too much commercial footage and too many market-rate condos, and
besides it was too close to the street to accommodate a bus or a
turn lane.

Williams disputed the Blue Ribbon Budget Task Force’s claim that
the county must develop its way out of a looming budget crisis. He
said the pension funds supposedly creating a structural deficit
actually comprise a slush fund that would only need to be 100
percent funded if 100 percent of county employees retired
immediately. Rejecting the task force recommendations for auto
malls, oil development, and village centers, which he claimed
induce sprawl, Williams said that the county’s Cachuma Reservoir
could follow the example of privately owned El Capitan Ranch, which
rakes in millions of dollars renting out yurts and other
environmentally correct facilities for special events. He suggested
opening up the lake to benign uses that are currently disallowed,
such as kayaking and kiteboarding.

Raised in Ventura until he was 9, Williams then moved to Isla
Vista, attending Ellwood School, Goleta Valley Junior High, and Dos
Pueblos High. His father was a well-known radio DJ for KTYD and
KCSB; his mother is a teacher. Williams dropped out of school at
the age of 16 and lived in a VW bus at Leadbetter Beach while
surfing and attending SBCC. During that time, he became a
born-again Christian and ardent environmentalist, going to work for
legendary 3rd District supervisor Bill Wallace and the campaign to
save Ellwood Shores from development. He attended UC Berkeley, then
UCSB’s Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, where
he majored in land-use and planning. He then taught, worked as a
legislative aide in Sacramento, and managed a precinct for the
African National Congress in Capetown. Williams was elected to the
Santa Barbara City Council in 2004, and if elected to the Board of
Supervisors would be leaving halfway through that term.

Janet Wolf Wolf has pounded the drum more
insistently than anyone else in the campaign for critical workforce
housing. The county should use its own land to build homes for
firefighters, police, and other emergency workers, according to
Wolf. Government-owned land is also the best bet for building other
low-income housing, she said, because privately owned land is
already too expensive. Similarly, the most promising way to supply
private workforce housing is for businesses to provide it for their
own workers, as Cottage Hospital is doing by converting the former
St. Francis Hospital into a subsidized condominium complex. Wolf is
the moderate’s moderate. Her essential promise is to use her best
judgment in the issues brought before her, to listen to all sides,
and to encourage compromise between warring factions. She explained
that she does not come in with a strong agenda, any more than she
did when she ran for the Goleta school board, where she served for
11 years. Her campaign slogan then was “Maintain Quality
Education” — which she saw as being threatened by ideologues — and
she approaches this campaign with the same attitude.

In response to suggestions by Blue Ribbon Budget Committee Task
Force, for example, all four candidates rejected the idea of oil
development, but Wolf said she is willing to consider auto malls,
especially in the North County, where several already exist. Nor
does she slam the door on the idea of village centers, depending on
where they are located. She was interested in exploring higher
bed-taxes, but dismissed the idea of more outsourcing.

Wolf cites the compacted San Marcos Foothills residential plan
as a model for resolving battles regarding open space. At More
Mesa, Wolf said that the zoning density pattern — 0.7 units per
acre close to the ocean cliffs and 3.3 per acre farther
back — might be amended even more, so that “a portion of those 70
acres could be kept as they are now.” In addition to pursuing state
and federal funds, she expressed interest in establishing a
tax-deductible donations fund to buy parks and other open space,
including More Mesa.

On rezoning urban agricultural lands to provide housing, Wolf
was vague, saying she does not have enough information to take a
position. In chorus with all the other candidates, she deferred to
the community planning process, but said she is open to the
possibility of affordable housing on MTD’s ag-zoned property at
Turnpike and Hollister.

Wolf grew up in Culver City, majored in political science at
UCSB, earned a master’s degree in kinesthesiology and a teaching
credential at UCLA, and briefly taught PE and English at Pacifica
Junior High in San Francisco. She and her husband, an attorney
specializing in business litigation, moved to Santa Barbara in
1981, where they raised three children. She is a team athlete,
favoring soccer and roller hockey. A self-employed vocational
consultant, Wolf frequently serves as an expert witness in
work-related injury lawsuits and in divorce cases, where she helps
the court determine the divorcing parties’ earning power. Her
proudest accomplishments on the school board include convincing the
board to bar the Boy Scouts from recruiting on campuses as long as
they did not accept gay scouts, initiating pesticide-free
landscaping and the first elementary school recycling program in
the county, passing a school bond, and keeping the El Camino campus
open.

Login

Please note this login is to submit events or press releases. Use this page here to login for your Independent subscription

Not a member? Sign up here.