• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • Business
    • NewsFlash
  • Arts & Entertainment
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Personals

Photo: Ray Ford

Zaca Fire May Be Contained Behind Santa Barbara Today

Hot Shots Help Avoid the Final Backfire


Tuesday, August 21, 2007
By Ray Ford (Contact)
Article Tools
Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
Digg! Digg!
furl furl
google google
newsvine newsvine
reddit reddit
technorati technorati
Facebook Facebook
Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

At this morning’s briefing, operations leaders pointed to the large map behind them to emphasize how close the Live Oak team was to finishing the final line around the fire in the Pendola area.

“I think we’re going to have good news for those down in Santa Barbara,” Incident Co-Commander Chris Childers added. “We should have the final piece of hand line in place today.”

If the Hot Shots get the work done today and close off the last two small sections of uncontained line, fire commanders may be able to declare 100 percent containment in the Live Oak Zone tomorrow or the following day.

Photo: Ray Ford

Light green circle shows the area where hot shots are working to establish a final containment line today. They will not consider the line completely contained until it has held for at least 24 hours.

“We’re at 92% containment right now,” the other Incident Co-Commander Rocky Opliger told agency representatives at a meeting later in the morning. “We’re feeling pretty comfortable right now.”

Today’s good news prompted the fire team to recommend that Paradise Road be re-opened to the public. If this occurs, visitors will be able to drive in as far as the first river crossing at Lower Oso. That announcement may come later today. But for those who want to head out, the Forest Service wants to remind the public that the forest is still largely closed.

Hard Days for the Hot Shots

Just a few days ago, after the fire had exploded up Agua Caliente and Diablo Canyons, slopped over the Monte Arido ridge into Ventura County and threatened to move south towards Santa Barbara, it appeared the only solution left was to backfire from Pendola Jeepway towards the advancing flames.

Photo: Ray Ford

Yesterday's back firing operations secured the southern part of the Monte Ardo ridge and the top half of Pendola Jeepway.

On Saturday the backfires were ignited and the massive clouds of smoke and ash began to build, causing a great deal of worrying for South Coast residents. From the crest, the display was impressive. By late afternoon it was clear the first phase of the burn program was a success.

The question then became: Will the second phase go as well? Not only was this a more difficult piece to burn due to the “dogleg” section of the Jeepway, but the fire would get pretty close to the Santa Ynez River. There would be little room for error.

Later on Saturday, as the final details for this second phase of the backfiring were being worked out, commanders were getting feedback from the field that the Hot Shot crews down on the line might be able to go direct and connect the containment line in Mono Creek to Pendola Jeepway.

At about the same time, Incident Commander Childers and Night Operations Leader Mark Chambers were on a reconnaissance flight over the area. As they followed the jeepway down towards the lower line of the backfiring operations, the helicopter pilot mentioned that it was too bad they couldn’t cut the fire off right at the top part of the dogleg.

Photo: Ray Ford

Close up view of the area in which final containment may be established for the south side of the fire today. By going direct the past two days, the fire fighters have kept almost 10,000 acres from needing to be back fired.

“The ops leader and I looked at each other and thought, why not?” Childers remembered. Chambers added, “We could see the fire had really stalled out in Diablo Canyon. It really didn’t want to burn anywhere, but where we were doing the backfiring.”

What you had was one of those moments where consensus was building to move the strategy away from firing the lower section out completely and back to going direct. The Hot Shots were saying they could do it — and up in the air the leaders were agreeing.

On Sunday, when shifting winds made it impossible to fire out the dogleg section of Pendola Jeepway, the decision was made to go direct from both sides — down into Agua Caliente Canyon from Hildreth Jeepway on the west and down off Pendola Jeepway on the east across the lower end of Diablo Canyon and into Agua Caliente.

Dozer lines were cut from both ends to provide a safety zones to protect the crews. With those in place, the Los Padres, Eldorado, and Texas Canyon Hot Shots went to work.

The work was extremely intense: the drop off the west ridge was almost a thousand feet to the bottom of Agua Caliente — and from the Pendola Jeepway nearly 1,200 feet — both major elevation drops on which to build 10-foot-wide hand lines in thick brush.

Even though the DC-10 was dropping down thousands of gallons of additional retardant along the jeepway in case the whole area needed to be fired out, by Sunday evening the Shots had made enough progress that it was clear the direct attack was working well.

By the day’s end Monday, all but two very small sections of fire line were left: one finger in Agua Caliente Canyon and one part of the ridgetop to the east.

Though there won’t be an announcement for a day or so that containment is complete on the Santa Barbara side of the fire, for the first time in several weeks, it appears the county’s longest and largest fire will no longer threaten the South Coast.

Author’s Note

Though the fire may be winding down for the Santa Barbara area, the Zaca Fire is far from over. There is still a large amount of backfire operations needed on the Highway 33 side of the fire. And along the Sisquoc, there is more than 5 miles of uncontained fire line that will be extremely difficult to contain. Over the next few days, I’ll concentrate on what’s happening on the other side of the fire.

Today the fire officially became the second largest fire in modern California history when it reached 220,683 acres (345 square miles, or 12.6 percent of the county). Within one week — give a day or two — it will become the state’s largest when it surpasses the 273,000 acre Cedar Fire. It still has not burned a structure (only one small shed) nor caused any significant injuries.

Story Help (Click-ability)
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Comments

Discussion Guidelines

Brilliant reporting Ray. Your clear description of the fire-fighting process combined with your deep knowledge of the back country has been a gift to us all. Thanks!

marksb (anonymous profile)
August 21, 2007 at 1:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)

This is a bright spot (for the upper Santa Ynez drainage) in an otherwise dismal story, thanks again for the very detailed reporting. Please do keep us informed on the NE and NW fronts henceforth -- topography, fuels and the likelihood of substantial wind changes N of Pine Mtn and W of hwy 33 make the NE sector very dicey, such that an unlucky afternoon there could run this thing to the Day fire boundary. Winds and topography (if not access) would appear to make the Sisquoc front more predictable and perhaps containable, if the resources remain available.

Outback (anonymous profile)
August 21, 2007 at 2:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)

The Zaca Fire is a government conspiracy to cover up the commonly asserted notion that Anna Nicole is the perpetrator of the JFK assassination, 9-11 attacks, and Global Warming. I suggest investigating who is to profit from the "Blue Line" painting campaign!! THE FIRE IS A LIE!!

lovechop (anonymous profile)
August 21, 2007 at 7:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Tell that to a few hundred thousand animals that died horribly, lovechop.

Outback (anonymous profile)
August 21, 2007 at 11:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)

"ZACA FIRE RAGES TO RECORD SIZE" - today's News-Press frontpage headline (see it on internet)...I know Zaca ain't over, & that the news is that this fire has officially been rated as California's #2 size-historical fire; but geeze-loueeze this sensational headline sounds like all of California is going up in flames, not to mention Santa Barbara. I would never give the NP $2.50 to read the story that goes with this title, or even 50 cents at the newsstands to assuage my curiosity about this, but wow, how interesting to compare this to the real scoop on your pages. (I have to add that the Zaca Fire has turned me into a regular morning reader of Indy web edition...thank you!)

HiAll (anonymous profile)
August 22, 2007 at 8:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)

While I appreciate the updates, I am sad that we don't value the life that has been lost. While the forest continues to free burn, we should rejoice that "we" are out of harm's way? The truth is that this fire will signifgantly impact our already poor water quality.
I am mainly concerned that we are "comfortably numb", to this huge ecoligical disaster. Like the burning of ghettoes during riots or the slaughter of innocent women, children and men in Iraq. Should we just be happy that "our" houses are not burning and "our" people are not "signifigantly" injured?
Is it possible that we need to spend a few billion dollars to update our forest fire fighting technology? While not as sexy as jet fighters or heat seeking missles, fighting fires seems at least equally as important.

panzumo (anonymous profile)
August 22, 2007 at 2:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)

ray -

thanks for your phenomenal reporting! your articles are a wonderful source of information and rationality. :) big fan of all your trail-related publishing as well, keep up the great work.

panzumo -

i'd be interested to see what evidence you have to support the fire's ability to "signifgantly impact our already poor water quality. "

forest fires can be and have been extremely beneficial to ecosystems, releasing minerals and nutrients into the soil to provide for new growth. some species have seed pods will not open unless subjected to the extreme temperatures of a wildfire event. it is the way of the forest, and native americans understood this better than the federal government seems to.

the century-old policy of wildland firefighting is what causes massive fuel buildup and leads to out-of-control fires, similar to the Zaca fire. the perceived protection of forest aesthetics lead to dangerous situations. i don't disagree that we need to protect valuable/ historic structures and life as much as possible, but i do disagree with your contention that this is an ecological disaster.

fire ecology information:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_ecolog...

kdevilbiss (anonymous profile)
August 22, 2007 at 9:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)

kdevibiss-
While I don't have a master's degree in riparian ecosystems, I can deduce that tree's well over 200 years old are not looking to regenerate after this fire.
I also seriously doubt that you have backbacked thoughout the area, now scorched, judging from your
perspective. If 100 homes had burned down you probably would've categorized this fire as a major disaster, but not the burning alive of ten's of thousands of creatures?

panzumo (anonymous profile)
August 23, 2007 at 2:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)

panzumo,

i grew up in and have lived in the santa barbara area for most of my life. i have backpacked and traveled extensively throughout the santa barbara backcountry. how simple and presumptuous of you to assume otherwise.

oh, i suggest that you look up the definition of the word "riparian," seeing as how it has no application to this conversation.

your alarmist perception of the "burning alive of ten's of thousands of creatures" is in all likeliness inaccurate and more worthy of Fox News than The Independent. while much of it is displaced, i guess wildlife isn't perceptive enough to move away from the fire, in your eyes... (?) there certainly aren't thousands of creatures "burning alive," unless you mean insects and micro-organisms.

really, you should be more informed before you go spewing misinformation and making grandiose analogies to the iraq war and "the burning of ghettoes during riots."

kdevilbiss (anonymous profile)
August 23, 2007 at 3:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Post a comment

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

EVENT CALENDAR

Previous Month | Next Month

Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

Local Weather

Currently:
Clear Sky
Temperature:
66.9°
Wind:
12 W

Surf Report
  • Specials
  • InPrint
  • Top Emails
  • Summer Camp Guide 2008
  • Wedding Guide 2008
  • SBIFF 2008 All Access
  • 2008 Election Info
  • Best of Reader's Poll 2007
  • Local Bands
  • Kid's Mother's Day Issue
  • Blue & Green Guide 2007
  • Made in Santa Barbara
  • Zaca Fire 2007
  • Five Candidates Vie for the County’s Hottest Supervisorial Seat
  • An Interview with Willie Brown
  • Judge Joe Lodge Dies
  • U.S. Military Measures Climate Change
  • A Taste of Hotel Café Helps Bid SOhO’s Anna Zamir a Fond Farewell
  • Wheels of Hope
  1. Judge Joe Lodge Dies
  2. Nuns Leaving Town
  3. News-Press, Indy Settle Lawsuit
  4. Montecito Debates Rick Caruso’s Miramar Remodel
  5. The Hidden Costs of Mountain Biking
  • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
Google
 
Independent.com Web
Copyright ©2008 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
This is our Privacy Policy.