Bruce Caron — a proponent for the Light Blue Line, the controversial 1,000-foot strip of blue paint slated for the streets of Santa Barbara to highlight the threat of global warming — has decided to withdraw his application from City Hall. Caron’s decision came just two days after developer and real estate baron Jerry Beaver announced the formation of a committee dedicating to keeping the Light Blue Line off the city’s streets. The proposed project has been the subject of intense criticism in the pages of the Santa Barbara News-Press almost since the day the City Council approved it two months ago.
Additionally, real estate interests have jumped into the fray, arguing that properties on the wrong side of the blue line could suffer diminution of property values. The line was designed to illustrate where Santa Barbara’s new sea shore would be if and when Greenland’s ice sheets were to melt as a result of global warming and, consequently, the sea level were to rise 21 feet. Some real estate operators worried that owners of properties lying between the ocean and the line might be required to disclose this fact to prospective buyers. With a city council election just around the corner, the issue of global warming — or at least the public art designed to address it — had grown too hot.
Caron and councilmember Helene Schneider — who spearheaded council efforts on behalf of the Light Blue Line — argued that the controversy surrounding the project helped focus public attention on the issue of global warming. The first objection leveled against the proposal was cost; City Hall had earmarked up to $12,000 for city staff to help Caron and his team of volunteers apply the paint to downtown city streets. Schneider sought to mollify the fiscal critics of the project by securing the funds from a private donor, but then the objections shifted. The real estate lobby got on board, complaining about prospective loss of property value. Fanning the fames of this dispute was the News-Press and its editorial page editor, Travis Armstrong.
A polarizing figure in Santa Barbara politics, Armstrong has crossed swords with many members of the City Council. In part because of this, some council members were extremely reluctant to abandon the project. “I hate to say it, but Travis won. You saw how the Orioles lost by 30-to-3. We’ll, we lost just 100-to-nothing,” said City Councilmember Brian Barnwell. “I was really looking forward to making our case. We never even got an at bat. We only played half an inning. The public never really got to hear our side of the story.”
That story, according to Barnwell, is that the idea was kicked around in various city review commissions for over an a year before the council approved it; that even the Historic Landmarks Commission, which Barnwell termed “arguably the most persnickety commission we have,” approved it with minor modification two weeks ago. “I got a call from [developer] Jeff Bermant saying how the project made him nervous,” Barnwell recalled. “What I should have told him is, 'That’s what it’s supposed to do. You should feel nervous. You should feel nervous because global warming is a really scary issue.' I think the project would have helped make that point.” A real estate appraiser by training, Barnwell said he would have loved to challenge anyone arguing their real estate values would have been hurt by the temporary line. Like Schneider and other blue line advocates, Barnwell said the city’s real estate maps are already inscribed with far more ominous squiggles — those showing the locations of earthquake fault lines, flood maps, fire zones, and tsunami threats.
Critics of the Light Blue Line have countered the proposed sea rise lines the basis of considerable scientific scrutiny and public debate. Not all scientists believe, they pointed out, that Greenland will in fact melt. Supporters of the line, like Caron, insist the line was designed as a precautionary statement, designed to illustrate the worst case scenario if humans did not change behavior contributing to global warming.
Councilmember Schneider said she was sad that Caron opted to the pull the project, but said she supported his decision. “I think it was the right thing to do," she said. "The whole thing had gotten so divisive that the real point of the project got lost and overshadowed. It was just getting out of hand.” Schneider said she was surprised by the degree of vehemence and irritation about the project, especially from people she encountered outside the usual activist circles. “You’d hear people go, ‘Oh my God I’m going to lose my mortgage.' But they weren’t freaking out about the real threat but about a little paint on the street. The whole thing is sad.”
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.
Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This


Previous Month


Comments
Discussion Guidelines
<insert squaking sound of chickens here>
Do all these real estate speculators somehow think that the sea level no longer will be rising and the glaciers no longer are melting?
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
FirstDistrictStreetfighter (anonymous profile)
August 23, 2007 at 7:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Travis did not win....the residents, property owners and tax payers of Santa Barbara won. This was stupid from the beginning.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
Cypress (anonymous profile)
August 23, 2007 at 8:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"...you should feel nervous because global warming is a really scary issue."
Au contraire, mon frere. It is neither scary, nor an issue. it simply "is."
While human activity may be exacerbating and/or accelerating this condition, there is absolutely nothing ( and I do mean NOTHING) that any of us can do to change the nature of the future outcome.
Consider, as but one example among many, a billion Chinese who long to "advance" from an agrarian society to an affluent, industrial one. The "Chinese Dream," like the American dream before it, now includes as an important first goal the acquisition of the quintessential upwardly mobile status symbol - the automobile. My bicycle be damned!
I doubt that the typical consumer will have the means to afford a new Prius. Rather, that first "new" car is likely to be a 1956 Ford Fairlane belching soot and guzzling fossil fuel. Get my point?
Thus, no matter how many CFLs we install in our "green" homes, they will matter not a whit against the countervailing forces at play in the larger world.
De-forestation. Cut down forests to plant corn for ethanol. Remember your physics, "for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction." Trees absorb CO2 and produce oxygen, possibly helping thwart the acceleration of global warming. We live in a "closed system." Again, from your physics class, "matter is neither created nor destroyed but simply changed from one form to another." Extrapolate from there. Get my point?
Global warming, global shwarming. Or, for those on the other side of the debate, new ice age, new shmice age.
Conclusion: Enjoy what you can, while you can. Do a little good if you can while riding on the great mandala. Don't sweat the BIG stuff. Que sera, sera!
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
Observer (anonymous profile)
August 23, 2007 at 8:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
HUGE "WIN FOR THE WISE!" Hooray!
Travis did not win; he posted the people's comments, others read and got involved. Shows the NP is doing ok reaching the people mentioned by Cypress.
Helene thought the $12,000 donation closed the case. The Mayor then deferred to Helene's coup. Mayor and Council lose for now!
They are now trying to extend their 'terms.' Wait and Watch.
Related subject: Esquire did not seem to 'misquote' the other 29 mayors interviewed! Hmm. (NP col. 8/23 front page.)
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
SpiffyInSantaBarbara (anonymous profile)
August 23, 2007 at 11:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I am concerned that the "blue" nature of the line might be offensive to SMURF-fans. Furthermore...the line does nothing in the way to advance SB´s goal to attract more homeless and at the same time discourage beautiful redevelopments. Oh, and for the love of god, does ANYONE know of a minority who might be interested in a 6xweek job of petroling up my Hummer?! Thank you.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
lovechop (anonymous profile)
August 23, 2007 at 11:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I think the city should spend a lot of money to paint a red line on both sides of State Street from Cabrillo Blvd. to Anapamu St. It would make our citizens aware, and alert our tourists, of what would be a really nice area if we could get rid of the drunken transient panhandlers.
Just a really good idea.
By the way...Doesn't the word "transient" mean, going from place to place? I don't see them going anywhere...except maybe Going #1 in the stairwells of the city parking lots, and #2 on the lawn near the library.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
SantaBorracho (anonymous profile)
August 24, 2007 at 1:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Thank you for sharing your wise words, Observer.
Both supporters and opponents of this particular project may be seen as trying to "do a little good" in the different worlds they inhabit on the one planet they share with each other and the many others living on Earth in their different worlds.
Who can say for certain who is "right," who is "wrong," who "won," who "lost" in this situation?
As I reflect on the meaning of what is taking place, I am grateful for any evidence that we can work through our inevitable differences in a spirit of humility and grace.
Thank you to all who are commited to that.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
marcmcginnes (anonymous profile)
August 24, 2007 at 9:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Fifty years from now, the growing effects of human activity on the planet will be a fact of life and have spawned tangible conditions that we will be living with on a daily basis. By then, this tempest in a teapot in Santa Barbara over a temporary blue line painted on our sidewalks won't mean a thing.
The only issue we might want to consider now in the late summer of 2007 is how drastic an impact will climate change, pollution and the human-created imbalance of the global ecosystem have on our daily lives. To wit, what will this do to our water and food supplies, which opportunistic microbes and parasites will arise and what challenges might these new realities present us to maintain an acceptable level of health and physical comfort.
For a preview of what life could well be like in the near future, take a look at what's going on in South Asia right now, particularly India's Uttar Pradesh and Bihar states. Flooding, hunger, widespread illness and general 'war zone' conditions prevail at this moment, all created by highly unusual weather, bacteria multiplying in stagnant water and wholly inadequate medical supplies, food and resources.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
emptynewsroom (anonymous profile)
August 24, 2007 at 1:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I love all the suggestions that lines should be painted all over town to mark fire danger zones, gang turf lines, the most dangerous intersections, etc. I mean, these are here and now problems, not speculation about the future. (Is it 20 feet in 100 or 1,000 years...I forget...) The ocean level hasn't risen significantly in half a century. The point is the blue line idea has proven horribly devisive. Sure, there's more discussion on the topic, but from my vantage point it hasn't convinced anyone to change their mind. I feel sorry for those who choose to blame the NP for stoking the fire, and those unwilling to see that the blue line project shoulda been dropped weeks ago.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
wonarrowfan (anonymous profile)
August 24, 2007 at 3:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Not all scientists believe, they pointed out, that Greenland will in fact melt."
No, of course Greenland won't melt, but the ice sheets covering a significant part of it are already melting and will continue to do so unless radical changes are made. Sure "not all scientists believe" that -- I'm sure there's a chemist working in a lab somewhere who doesn't believe it -- but virtually every climatologist believes it, as the evidence is very clear.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
jqb (anonymous profile)
August 24, 2007 at 4:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)
jqb wrote: "...unless radical changes are made."
And just why is it necessary to make radical changes? As I wrote above in my post of 8-23 @ 8:11pm, "...we live in a closed system.... Que sera, sera!"
Capiche?
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
Observer (anonymous profile)
August 25, 2007 at 12:40 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I for one would like to see the light-blue line for SB in a Google Earth .KMZ file or on Google Maps. Has this been done? If not, could be a nice project.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
August 26, 2007 at 1:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Aha, I should have searched before posting. Looks like somebody beat me to the idea:
http://www.lightblueline.org/node/154
The maps are really interesting. I wish the blue overlay was a bit more transparent, but good work!
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
August 26, 2007 at 2:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Post a comment