WEATHER »

Casting Lots for College?


Wednesday, December 19, 2007
Article Tools
Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Share Article

With college-application deadlines looming, high schoolers across the land are frenetically preparing for one more shot at the SAT, agonizing over personal essays, or wrestling with financial aid forms. And while wealthy applicants hire pricey tutors and admissions consultants to help with the process, many low-income candidates and students of color despair of capturing a seat in the freshman class. Surely, there must be a better way.

Recently, UC Berkeley sociologist Jerome Karabel proposed in a commentary in The New York Times an alternative pathway to top-ranked colleges: a lottery. Karabel suggests that this approach, which would involve randomly choosing among applicants who met a “high academic threshold,” could help counter an admissions system that consistently privileges the privileged.

Lottery admissions procedures in higher education have been considered repeatedly over the last four decades, and there are now both research findings and real-life experiments that can inform us about the results. First, a lottery with a threshold, such as that proposed by Jerome Karabel, is unlikely to benefit low-income candidates and students of color. Second, although random selection may seem equitable in the abstract, it tends not to be regarded as fair in practice.

A college-admissions lottery was evidently first proposed in a 1969 letter to the editor of Science by the education scholar Alexander Astin, who suggested that a lottery could serve to increase the enrollment of minority students. “In the interests of putting the concept of ‘equality of educational opportunity’ into practice,” he said, colleges “might want to consider abandoning altogether the use of grades and tests in admissions, and instituting instead a lottery system.”

A lottery-with-threshold was suggested by the UC Davis professor Norman Matloff in a 1995 Los Angeles Times op-ed piece. Essentially, Matloff’s rationale for this policy, which he proposed for use at the University of California, was that applicants above the threshold could be regarded as having equal claims to the resource in question-a college education. The lottery-with-threshold idea has been widely promoted by the Harvard University law professor Lani Guinier, who advocates this approach as a means of increasing the representation of people of color on college campuses. A prominent critic of admissions tests, she recommends a lottery for applicants who exceed a threshold based - oddly enough - on admissions test scores.

Would a lottery with an SAT-score threshold increase the representation of low-income and minority applicants, who tend to score lower on admissions tests? A recent analysis by political scientists Bernard Grofman and Samuel Merrill showed that it was not possible to find a threshold that was high enough to make the “equal claims” argument plausible, and yet low enough to yield a substantial improvement in the representation of lower-scoring groups. They gave an illustration showing that “a lottery-based system with a realistic minimum threshold will result in only a minuscule rate of minority acceptance compared to that of whites.”

A similar conclusion was reached by the economists Anthony Carnevale and Stephen Rose in a recent study based on data from 146 top U.S. universities. These researchers also found that, because of the reduction in the academic qualifications of admitted students, a lottery-with-threshold “would likely result in dramatically reduced graduation rates or lowered standards.”

What about public reaction to lottery admissions? According to a College Board report, the lottery approach “was experimented with several decades ago,” but abandoned when highly qualified applicants were rejected and weaker applicants from the same high school were accepted. A medical school lottery in the Netherlands was decried by citizens there as “immoral” and was curtailed in 2000 after a public protest. And a nationwide survey of 2,100 adults conducted in 1999 found that 83 percent rejected the idea of lottery-based college admissions.

A college-admissions lottery may seem appealing at first blush because it provides equal access - at least for a certain group of candidates. But random selection does not automatically imply fairness. The decision to treat all individuals - or individuals “above a threshold” - as interchangeable requires justification, just as any other selection principle does. And dissatisfaction with the status quo is not an adequate justification.

We as a society need to do the hard work of crafting admissions policies that are consistent with our ethical and educational principles. We can do better than casting lots.

Dr. Rebecca Zwick is a professor in the Department of Education at UC Santa Barbara's Gevirtz School. This work first appeared in Education Week online.

Comments

Independent Discussion Guidelines

How about extending anti-discrimination concepts to the employment process.

Just like sex, race and age, employers should not be able to say "No Degree, No Job...Don't even think of applying."

Maybe we should quit holding out a college degree as the holy grail of proof of competence.

Maybe we should emphasise secondary and high school education as the holy grail of learning and concentrate on the 30% drop out rate.

Maybe there should be some 10 year follow up program that would rescind a college degree award if the graduate has failed to live up to expectations.

Maybe you should outlaw tenured positions that keep substandard educators in their place.

Maybe you should institute manditory drug testing for professors, doctors, lawyers. judges and politicians just like they do to the lowly transportation workers.

Maybe you should require ten years of employment in the real world before considering someone for a teaching position in the Ivory Tower rather than the incestous professional student path you now use.

Maybe you can quit using the title of "Doctor" to aggrandise yourself. More like Dr., Heal thy self...less like Dr. Laura, the purveyor of truth.

Maybe you can take the $900 MILLION dollars for UCSB expansion and fix the imploding inner city schools throughout California. Give the majority a chance at useful education.

sa1 (anonymous profile)
December 19, 2007 at 2:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I have heard (and what I say may be subject to correction--which if I am wrong hopefully will be corrected) that it starts with the tax funding of schools based on local property taxes. If this is the case, how can a secondary school in Compton compete with one in Beverly Hills?

Second point: We throw endless funds at schools (bond measures and the lottery come to mind as cure-alls to the problem) and for some reasons the funds don't get to the classrooms in a way that makes a difference. How many times have we heard them tell us "This measure will go a long way in solving the problem of..." then two years later they're begging for more money. Where does the money go?

billclausen (anonymous profile)
December 19, 2007 at 3:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)

thanks Miss rebecca and i love your writing. i agree that Casting Lots for College is useful.
http://www.essayavenue.co.uk/write-my...

nancywill (anonymous profile)
November 18, 2013 at 10:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Annyjames (anonymous profile)
November 19, 2013 at 11:30 p.m. (Suggest removal)

You've really done a great work with this article - http://www.getessaypaper.com/assignme...

getessaypaper (anonymous profile)
February 21, 2014 at 3:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I am very desired to see a site like this.
http://www.bestessaycompany.com/write...

bestessaycompany (anonymous profile)
February 23, 2014 at 9:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I would like to say thank for sharing this great article.
http://www.helpdohomework.com/help-fo...

bobsmith (anonymous profile)
April 29, 2014 at 2:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)

This is nice stuff I can say that you have shared great information here.
http://www.assignmentprovider-aus.com

mikeedison (anonymous profile)
August 12, 2014 at 11:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I found your website perfect for my needs,Keep Blogging.
http://www.abctripleparish.org/2014/0...

robinsouthwell (anonymous profile)
August 21, 2014 at 2:05 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Some fascinating comments above.

billclausen (anonymous profile)
August 21, 2014 at 2:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Education is now consider to be a basic need of any person to earn for his living and to be accepted in any society. Students sometime face difficulties of late assignments or projects submissions which effects their grades. In such situations its better to go for online resources who provide assignment writing services. One of the most popular website in UK is http://www.ukwritingexperts.co.uk/cus...

AndrewCena (anonymous profile)
August 27, 2014 at 5:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Education today can be readily obtained on line, for free and from the most prestigious institutions. What we are talking about is a piece of paper which shows the reciipent disciplined themselves enough to meet external criteria regarding a course of study.

They showed up, did what was expected and showed some degree of both initiative and follow through. Whether the subject matter was relevant, well-taught, or credible or whether the course material actually sunk in is not relevavant, the piece of paper is power.

Such is the currency of the realm today. And none of these intangibles in what we call formal education today should be discredited. This piece of paper serves as a buffer between childhood and adulthood and assures employers of a certain level of personal competence when no other competing bench marks are available.

This piece of paper however is not the exclusvie sign of skill and ability, as our notorious collge drop-out billionaires prove everyday.

JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
August 27, 2014 at 9:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Just because - the state of public finance and education reform in California today:

http://unionwatch.org/the-looming-bip...

This link ranks as a critical must-read for everyone: The looming bipartisan backlash against unionized government.

JarvisJarvis (anonymous profile)
August 27, 2014 at 10:05 a.m. (Suggest removal)

This is a great steps towards college students really appreciate your efforts.

http://www.houseofresume.com/

laylaaddison (anonymous profile)
October 3, 2014 at 3:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)

event calendar sponsored by: