• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    Ben Ciccati

    A Viable Rail System Trumps Widening the Freeway

    Slaves to the 101


    Thursday, December 20, 2007
    By Pat Veesart, area resident and former executive director of ECOSLO
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    Hardly a day goes by that Californians don’t hear more dire news about the weather and the impact it is having on our natural resources and economy. Even those who don’t watch the news, read a newspaper, own a computer, or talk to their neighbors can walk outside and observe that it is getting warmer and drier here in the West. While there are still a few flat-earthers (mostly oil company executives) who refuse to acknowledge the overwhelming scientific evidence that humans are radically altering the Earth’s climate, ignorance will not insulate them, or their children, from the consequences of our love affair with oil. We are not going to be “inconvenienced” by global climate change; we are going to be slapped upside the head.

    While the ship is going down, the politicians make a big show of rearranging the deck chairs. There is a lot of hot air being expended in Sacramento talking about reducing greenhouse gas emissions, but the real money continues to be spent widening freeways and building new roads to access sprawling new development and accommodate ever-increasing numbers of private (single-occupancy) automobiles — one of the largest producers of greenhouse gases in California. Meanwhile, public transportation systems are chronically underfunded, disrespected, and given little more than symbolic lipservice by our political “leaders.”

    News flash: Widening freeways does not reduce congestion or air pollution. Widening freeways increases congestion and air pollution. The generally accepted definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. How is widening freeways in Southern California not insane by that definition?

    James Howard Kunstler has observed that we have a national rail system the Bulgarians would be ashamed of. I ride the train most days to work, and I can attest that Amtrak’s rolling stock is ancient, dirty, broken, and notoriously not on schedule. Each morning, between sips of coffee and reading my newspaper, I look out the window at the bumper-to-bumper snarl on Highway 101 between Ventura and Santa Barbara and wonder at the stupidity of ignoring the obvious rail solution while sinking wads of cash into widening the freeway. The rails have been in place for more than 100 years, but we are blind to everything except cars, cars, cars.

    Instead of spending transportation dollars to hasten our demise, how about spending them to build a public transportation system that reduces greenhouse gas emissions, reduces congestion, and provides lower-cost transportation alternatives in the face of rising gasoline prices? Instead of fighting wars over dwindling oil resources, how about reducing our dependency on foreign oil and increasing our independence? Instead of doing what’s politically expedient, how about doing what’s right?

    We find ourselves at a moment in history where our choices are rapidly becoming fewer. There are almost no second chances left. The future becomes more bleak with each bad decision we make. Either we start making good decisions and extricate ourselves from this tar pit, or we join the dinosaurs in becoming the oil of the future. ­

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    Wow! Why have I never seen anything by this author before? She's really good.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    fkplous (anonymous profile)
    December 21, 2007 at 2:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    "News flash: Widening freeways does not reduce congestion or air pollution. Widening freeways increases congestion and air pollution."

    News flash: The author doesn't know what the hell he's talking about. Poor land use planning has a been the cause of the congestion on U.S. Highway 101. More cars and trucks means more travel lanes are need on the highway. Communter trains will NEVER solve the problem.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    DarNel (anonymous profile)
    January 7, 2008 at 1:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    I just wish there was a way to shut down the freeway completely and the working class people who are forced to commute to SB could find other jobs. Maybe that would teach all the rich snobs and envirohypocrites who live here that life won't be so easy if people aren't commuting for over an over from Ventura to do the dirty work of Santa Barbarans because the Santa Barbarans is too pretty to have the 101 widened.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    rc251 (anonymous profile)
    January 7, 2008 at 8:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Face the facts:

    · Road widening will take 20 years and $500M+

    · Commuter rail will take 2 years and $40M

    The rhetoric by SBCAG "leaders" today indicates:

    · The North County agenda will prevail

    · Measure D ’08 will fail

    · Commuter rail will happen before widening

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    GlennYago (anonymous profile)
    January 17, 2008 at 11:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    "- Road widening will take 20 years and $500M+"

    "- Commuter rail will take 2 years and $40M"

    GlennYago, those are either lies or examples of your ignorance.

    For those of you unfamilar with regional transportation planning and engineering. There a ZERO studies that show that commuter rail reduces highway congestion. That's right ZERO studies. Delaying improvements to U.S. Highway 101 guarantees increased vehicle delays plus higher planning and construction cost. The cost to operate and maintain a commuter rail system is greater than adding travel lanes to the highway. That's an engineering and economic FACT. Land Use planning or in Santa Barbara the lack there of has been the greatest cause of the poor transportation system in the region.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    DarNel (anonymous profile)
    January 21, 2008 at 1:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    SBCAG's estimate for widening the remaining 8 miles of 101 has been at $428M for the last 5 years. I'd dare say $500+ is a much closer number right now, and in 20 years who knows how much more?
    At presentations of Measure D '08 projects by SBCAG, it's been said said on numerous occasions that we're looking at 2 decades of road construction before 101 is widened to the county line. That's if we have a new tax measure.
    Rail can do what roads can't. When you have an existing rail corridor, it's not too difficult to add capacity, and a commuter rail service between SB & Ventura County is very doable in a couple of years.
    Metrolink operates in 5 counties to the south, and was able to get their system up and running in 2 years. That's 435 miles of track, and getting 5 counties to sit down and put an agreement together. Our 43 miles of track and a 2 county agreement shouldn't be too difficult - if there's political will.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    GlennYago (anonymous profile)
    February 8, 2008 at 12:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Clear Sky
    Temperature:
    63.0°
    Wind:
    6 SE

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • Within the Syuxtun Story Circle
    • Camellia Sasanqua
    • Whole New Ballgame
    • Gratuitous Gore on Highway 154
    • Saul Williams Brings Afro-Punk Tour to Velvet Jones
    • Where There’s a Dill, There’s a Way
    1. Travis Armstrong Is Outta There
    2. S.B. Bank & Trust's Rocky Year
    3. UC Campuses Dominate Rankings
    4. What buildings did architect Julia Morgan design in Santa Barbara?
    5. Giving Back in the Giving Season
    6. Rattlesnake and San Roque Side of Jesusita Trails to Re-Open Friday
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.