• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • Business
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Outdoors
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Personals
  • Obits

Let the Games Begin


Monday, January 8, 2007
By Matt Kettmann (Contact)
Article Tools
Print friendly
E-mail story
Contact an Editor
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
Digg! Digg!
furl furl
google google
newsvine newsvine
reddit reddit
technorati technorati
Facebook Facebook
Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

Tuesday Kicks Off the News-Press NLRB Hearings

Tomorrow, Tuesday, January 9, at 9 a.m. in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court on State Street is the hour everyone's been waiting for since the newsroom of the Santa Barbara News-Press overwhelmingly voted to join the Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. That's when an administrative law judge representing the National Labor Relations Board will hear objections to the September 27 pro-union vote, which was 33 in favor of unionization and 6 opposed.

The hearing was scheduled soon after the vote, when News-Press owner Wendy McCaw did what many business owners faced with unionization do: charge that the vote was somehow compromised and file objections to the outcome. Specifically, McCaw's team is charging four things.

The first is that newsroom supervisors were involved in the election, which is not allowed according to the NLRB. This is seems to be a fairly common charge in unionization cases.

The second is that the savethenewspress.com website and various bumper stickers issued by the Teamsters tricked some employees into believing that the newspaper itself was in favor of unionization.

The third is that a threat posted by an unnamed commenter on blogabarbara.blogspot.com intimidated some employees into voting for unionization.

And the fourth is that the newsroom staff engaged in threatening behavior when delivering a letter to McCaw as a group.

The hearing is expected to last three days and is open to the public. Numerous witnesses will be called to vet these charges, and then the judge will decide whether McCaw's side has merit.

So what are the odds of her succeeding? Well, McCaw's legal eagles already submitted charges #1, #2, and #4 to the NLRB as unfair labor practices. The NLRB threw them out. (The NLRB did not, however, throw out the charges levied by the newsroom staff against McCaw and N-P management. Those unfair labor practice charges will, in fact, be heard on February 26.)

And for #3, the threat posted and then taken down at Blogabarbara? Since the N-P itself reposted the threat in a press release on Business Wire, thereby disseminating it to a wider audience, it seems doubtful that a judge would see in their favor on that one.

The union proponents are going into tomorrow's hearing with their heads held high. "We anticipate victory in connection with these baseless objections," explained a recent press release, "which were clearly filed by the company with the sole intent of delaying SBNP co-publisher and owner Wendy McCaw’s obligation to sit down at the table and negotiate a fair contract with her employees which will restore integrity to the newsroom."

So get ready for the showdown. The gloves come off tomorrow.

Story Help (Click-ability)
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Comments

Discussion Guidelines

Local readers will undoubtedly receive fair and balanced coverage of the proceeding, except from possibly the News-Press. Who wants to bet that Wendy McCaw and the former eating critic can't keep their mits off the story?

An ethics challenge...
January 8, 2007 at 6:38 p.m.

I'll take the bet.

On January 1, on the front page of her own newspaper, Mrs. McCaw said she valued "truth, excellence, ethical journalism and the best coverage of local events that can be had."

Why wouldn't she live up to her own words and allow an uncensored story about the NLRB hearings?

Shame on you for doubting!
January 8, 2007 at 7:19 p.m.

She will only print something if there is a favorable decision for her and then only through Ms. Huff. Isn't that what she has done all along?

Ex Inmate
January 9, 2007 at 3:56 a.m.

EVENT CALENDAR

Previous Month | Next Month

Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

Local Weather

Currently:
Mist
Temperature:
62.1°
Wind:
5 SE

Surf Report
  • Specials
  • InPrint
  • Top Emails
  • Blue Green Guide 2008
  • Summer Camp Guide 2008
  • Wedding Guide 2008
  • SBIFF 2008 All Access
  • 2008 Election Coverage
  • Best of Reader's Poll 2007
  • Calendar of Fundraisers
  • Local Bands
  • Kid's Mother's Day Issue
  • Made in Santa Barbara
  • Zaca Fire 2007
  • How a Group of Ex-Catholic Nuns Saved Their Famous Montecito Retreat Center
  • What Dems Are Doing in Denver While Republicans Ready for St. Paul
  • Runner Killed by Alleged DUI Driver
  • To Err Is Human, to Forgive Is Canine
  • Brian Wilson’s That Lucky Old Sun Tour Rises at the Lobero
  • S.B. Police Chief Wants Cops to Learn from Holocaust Survivors
  1. H2Oprah
  2. Drunk Driving Death on Las Positas Road
  3. County Flood Preparation Work Begins Following Gap Fire
  4. Radiohead Mesmerizes Santa Barbara
  5. Miramar Gets Green Light
  6. Gregory Doan Charged in Las Positas Road Runover
  • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
Google
 
Independent.com Web
Copyright ©2008 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
This is our Privacy Policy.