• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    Yellow Dog Blues


    Thursday, November 15, 2007
    By Nick Welsh (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    BYE-BYE BARNWELL: Maybe it’s true that defeat is an orphan and victory has a thousand fathers. But in the weird case of Santa Barbara City Councilmember Brian Barnwell, defeat appears more like a class action paternity suit— akin to that surrounding the pregnancy of kitschy sex kitten Anna Nicole Smith right before her death.

    Barnwell was the entrenched incumbent who, by all reckonings, should have cake-walked into a second term. Instead, he stunned the world of the conventionally wise by coming in fifth, garnering fewer votes than two challengers — Dale Francisco and Michelle Giddens — who between them had zero experience running for office. I didn’t always agree with Barnwell, but I’ll definitely miss him.

    Angry Poodle Barbecue

    In conversation, Barnwell was uncommonly candid where other elected officials were cautious, courageously and outrageously profane where others were guardedly proper, and restlessly uncertain where others painted themselves into tidy corners. But Barnwell was more than just a gifted blabbermouth. He was insatiably curious, and his positions would change — sometimes drastically enough to induce whiplash among his council colleagues — based on the accumulation of new information.

    Likewise, he rarely went in for the strategic posturing necessary to curry favor with influential constituencies that would help him climb the political food chain. Maybe he wasn’t good at it. Perhaps he thought he was too good for it. Or maybe he was happy right where he was. For those of us for whom political spin is an occupational hazard, Barnwell was refreshing. But his impetuous nature and shoot-from-the-lip tendencies also proved a liability.

    In what passes for the right-left spectrum of the City Council, Barnwell was a fuzzy centrist. The enviros never came to trust him no matter how hard he threw himself at recycling, creeks, and sustainability. And the developers and biz community — which proved instrumental in getting Barnwell elected four years ago — grew disenchanted when their man strayed from their brand of “common sense.”

    On election night, Barnwell complained there’s no room in politics for middle-of-the-road candidates. But truth be told, he was often a one-man circular firing squad. When he proclaimed the massive St. Francis affordable housing project proposed by Cottage Hospital to be the best in the city’s history, he seriously alienated the affections of neighborhood activists affiliated with the Bungalow Haven Liberation Front. But when Barnwell got green religion in response to global warming and tried to get Cottage to put solar panels on as many of the St. Francis rooftops as possible, his buddies on the Cottage board pulled a major-league pout. They threatened to withdraw their project entirely if Barnwell didn’t back off and behave. Barnwell retaliated by accusing them of arrogance from the council dais. Even so, he voted for their project. Then, for good measure, Barnwell pissed off the Bungalow Haven activistas one more time by sending a box of doughnuts to the city planners who worked on the Cottage housing project, thanking them for their help getting the St. Francis housing project approved. Little wonder that on election night Barnwell tanked in the upper Eastside neighborhoods near St. Francis. Little wonder, also, that Das Williams — the only councilmember to vote against the St. Francis housing project — was the top vote-getter on the upper Eastside.

    The lesson Williams has distilled from the election results was that the candidates who worked hardest and walked precincts earliest did the best in an election where the fewest number ever bothered going to the polls. For Williams, campaigning has always been like a nervous tic. He has to knock on doors; he has to raise money. And he did — more than anyone else. Williams, who emerged out of Santa Barbara’s progressive activist camp, could always count on the eco-groovy, stop-the-war, cars-suck, granola-eating bloc. But unlike any other operator from that camp, he actively wooed — and in some instances wowed — the splintered micro tribes of Santa Barbara’s neighborhood activists who are unified in their conviction that the bums in City Hall are plotting to sell them out. (It was out of one such tribe that successful challenger Francisco emerged, full of prickly fury over how City Hall approved the mini roundabouts and other traffic-calming devices.)

    Had Barnwell taken a page from Williams’s book and actively wooed the liberal Dems, maybe he’d have done better. But in this regard, Barnwell proved either lackadaisical, fatalistic, or both, and seemed to blow them off. Nor did it help Barnwell any that the firefighters union — which typically raises money and walks precincts on behalf of candidates — sat out this election, exasperated over the stalled state of their contract negotiations. Given our freshly frightened memories of the Zaca Fire, the firefighters’ endorsement might have had even more impact this year than it did immediately after 9/11. And certainly, Barnwell would have been their man. Likewise, the cops were at best desultory in their endorsement of the incumbents. This year they didn’t walk precincts, but instead sent out mailers that didn’t arrive until the afternoon of Election Day, too late to have any impact.

    Finally, there was the almost daily carpet bombing by the Santa Barbara News-Press in its editorial pages all but accusing the incumbents of everything short of flat feet, psoriasis, and genocide in Darfur. It’s true the paper harbored a special hatred for Barnwell, in part because his wife — Camilla Cohee, one of the many reporters to quit since last year — wrote the news article that triggered the meltdown that still engulfs the paper. It’s a fact that the News-Press bears little resemblance to its former self, let alone to a functioning daily paper. Certainly its plummeting readership bears this out. But like a blind, senile, incontinent dog I once owned, it can still bite if you get too close. To that extent only is News-Press editorial page hit man Travis Armstrong entitled to his self-intoxicated, post-election delusions of grandeur.

    Story Help (Click-ability)
    Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    Nick, why did you insult your former sweet, blind, senile, incontinent dog by comparing it to the News-Press? What did that dog ever do to you?

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    JoeHill (anonymous profile)
    November 15, 2007 at 9:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    I went down to the City Council awhile back and haranged them about how they should try with all their might to get the citizens of Santa Barbara to oppose the management of the News-Press and support the
    beleaguered reporters, and Brian Barnwell actually DID speak out, again and again. Later on two of the Francisco and Giddens people came by my house with their stuff and actually admitted they were still subscribing to the paper. I said,"Hands that touch the News-Press will never touch mine." They were just clueless. Who's going to WAKE UP THE SHEEP?! Thanks for trying, Brian.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    nataliebumpo (anonymous profile)
    November 15, 2007 at 10:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Nice guys finish fourth.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    Steve_Johnson (anonymous profile)
    November 19, 2007 at 9:01 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Few Clouds
    Temperature:
    63.0°
    Wind:
    6 SSW

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    • CAMA Presents the Shanghai Symphony
    • Elings Park Expansion Shot Down
    • Before I Be Your Dog …
    • Flobots Return with New Record, New Vision
    • Autism Attacked Alternatively
    1. Eating Animals
    2. Montecito Pet Shop to Sell Only Rescued Dogs
    3. Producer Must Pay Landscaper
    4. Nothing to Hide Anymore
    5. High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    6. Teacher in Trouble
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.