A federal plan to bring Southern California’s once-thriving steelhead population back from the brink of extinction has established the goal of having 4,150 adult steelhead running up and down the Santa Ynez River. That remains a far cry from the annual runs of 20,000 fish that made the Santa Ynez River a statewide Mecca for sport fishermen prior to the construction of Bradbury Dam — and Lake Cachuma — in the 1950s. Back then, the Santa Ynez was so bountiful that schoolkids were allowed to skip class when fishing season started, and farmers were known to use pitchforks rather than fishing poles to extract steelhead from the water. However historically diminished, the goal of 4,150 adult steelhead in the river seems staggeringly ambitious given the paltry populations that have managed to persist in the Santa Ynez and other rivers throughout Southern California. According to most estimates, regional steelhead populations have declined to less than one percent of what they were 50 years ago, despite considerable efforts during the past 15 years to rejuvenate the population.
The 4,150-fish figure was listed in a draft report authored by the National Marine Fisheries Service, the federal agency charged with restoring the steelhead, a species declared endangered 10 years ago. The number reflects the size of the steelhead population that needs to be found in the major rivers from Santa Maria to the Mexican border before the fish can be declared biologically viable — hence, eligible for de-listing. The report itself is a draft document, and designed to provide an outline of the efforts to be undertaken pending the formal completion of a full-fledged steelhead restoration plan. (That final plan was scheduled to be released earlier this fall, but is behind schedule.)
“For the last 15 years, water agencies have been releasing just enough water below the dam to keep the steelhead just barely on life support and nothing more,”
The report is eliciting dramatically different reactions from steelhead advocates and water agency officials. Environmentalists like the Environmental Defense Center’s Brian Trautwein have hailed the report as sound science, praising its central finding that the fish — which migrate to the ocean before returning to spawn in the river — must be reconnected with the fertile spawning grounds above Bradbury Dam for any restoration effort to succeed. Practically speaking, that means either trapping and trucking the fish above and below the dam or building fish ladders that might allow the fish to climb the face of the dam itself. Given the steepness of Bradbury, most fish enthusiasts regard trapping and trucking as the more likely alternative. “For the last 15 years, water agencies have been releasing just enough water below the dam to keep the steelhead just barely on life support and nothing more,” said Trautwein. “It’s time to stop taking water to where the fish are,” he said, “and start taking the fish to where the water is.”
Santa Barbara water agencies have responded to the federal report with guarded skepticism. “The report is just a draft,” said Tim Robinson, a biologist working with the Cachuma Operations Maintenance Board, the agency that manages the South Coast’s major source of drinking water. “I’m not sure where the 4,150 number comes from, how it was arrived at, or how reliable it is. It’s still too soon to say.” As for fish ladders or trapping and trucking the steelhead up the river, Robinson was equally noncommittal. “They’re certainly options. But they’re very expensive and very difficult options. We haven’t done the studies to determine how viable they are, and whether that’s the best use of our resources.” (Trautwein charged that water agencies have lobbied against such studies on the grounds that any form of fish transport along the Santa Ynez was intrinsically infeasible.) Robinson acknowledged, for example, that large-scale trapping and trucking operations take place in the Columbia and Snake rivers in the Pacific Northwest, but suggested the challenges along the Santa Ynez — which lacks easy access roads — might prohibit such operations. And he stressed that the water agencies had to balance the needs of the fish with the needs of their customers.
Robinson suggested that any fish transport program would prove costly. Trautwein — who acknowledged no reliable cost estimates exist — disagreed. “Given that the water from Bradbury Dam has driven all the agricultural, commercial, and residential development that’s taken place on the South Coast for the past 50 years, it’s a drop in the bucket,” he said. “It’s the least we can do.”
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
Previous Month


Comments
Discussion Guidelines
The federal report noted in this article is from last September (2007) by National Marine Fisheries Service, and is entitled "FINAL 2007 Recovery Outline for the DPS of Southern California Coast Steelhead 091407".
This full report is readily available at the agency website here:
http://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov/recovery/Steelh...
The figure of 4150 adult steelhead trout in Santa Ynez River is cited on page 33 of that report (link above). That figure comes from a still-draft report by the scientific team (Technical Recovery Team, TRT):
http://swfsc.noaa.gov/uploadedFiles/Divi...
This quantity of fish is not really the draft number in a draft Recovery Plan, but rather the best figure the scientists determined was necessary for a viable population of adult steelhead in each of the major rivers in southern California.
As we know, watersheds can burn and fish populations thusly would be wiped out, or nearly so, for a few years at a time following major fires that are inevitable.
Thus, multiple river basins and watersheds throughout southern California must support an adequate population of steelhead trout so the fish can move into other river basins and watersheds following fires or other peterbations that impact the localized fish populations.
Through their scientific modeling brainiac research, the same fish count of 4150 applies, so far, to Santa Maria River, Ventura River, and the other major hydrogeographic regions in southern California.
The lead Federal agency still is working on way, way more details for the actual Recovery Plan. The fish figure of 4150 simply is the only published number so far in these highly technical reference documents, which are cited in the Recovery Outline document linked above.
As the fifth major watershed that City of Santa Barbara really controls to a significant degree, we locals have a huge interest and responsibility for the ecological health of Santa Ynez River, including the endangered fish in the River.
Accordingly, as a major player in CCRB/COMB and its financial funder, the Santa Barbara City Council has a deep responsibility and direct purview over how this River is managed for the good or bad of the environment.
The steelhead that grow up in Santa Ynez River, however many they will and need to be, likely will the the ones that eventually colonize Mission Creek and smaller South Coast streams during the decades to come.
The first local mention of this Steelhead Recovery Plan Outline document was in my short interview with TRT member scientist Craig Fusaro, as part of my video produced a month ago highlighting the Santa Barbara Steelhead Festival 2007. That interview and my extensive video of real, live steelhead trout in Mission Creek downtown can be seen at our website for the video show Off-Leash Public Affairs:
http://offleashpublicaffairs.blogspot.co...
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
David_Pritchett (David Pritchett)
November 29, 2007 at 12:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Post a comment