• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Personals
  • Obits

Fired Davison Faces News-Press Attorney

Cappello Blames Poor Job Performance, Not Union Support, Got Her Fired


Thursday, September 6, 2007
By Martha Sadler
Article Tools
Print friendly
E-mail story
Contact an Editor
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
Digg! Digg!
furl furl
google google
newsvine newsvine
reddit reddit
technorati technorati
Facebook Facebook
Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

Reporter Anna Davison, one of nine former News-Press employees allegedly fired for union activity, suffered the slings and arrows of Ampersand Publishing's lead attorney, Barry Cappello all afternoon today.

Cappello said Davison was fired not for her union activity but for poor job performance. To support this position, Cappello brought out some less-than-glowing comments from recent job evaluations, in particular criticism that she spent too much time walking around the newsroom talking to other reporters. Mostly, though, Cappello grilled Davison on the research she did for "Walk This Way," a January 2007 article on the State Street Beautification Project whose bias was the main reason management gave for terminating her on January 25. Cappello characterized the piece as slanted in favor of removing a half-dozen street trees, deliberately undercutting a previous News-Press editorial against the tree removal, titled "Butchering State Street."

Most of Davison's article was devoted to the project at large, especially the replacement of the slippery tile sidewalks. However, it did note that "as part of the effort, several street trees are being cut down or moved, to the chagrin of some locals." Davison's bias revealed itself, according to Cappello, in that she did not actually name or quote any of said locals, whereas she did quote city officials describing the landscaping that would replace the trees. Much of the afternoon was spent going over steps Davison took—or didn't take—to locate people who lamented the loss of the trees. When nobody she interviewed on the street expressed those sentiments, he asked, why had she not asked editorial page editor Travis Armstrong for the names of people who might have written letters to the editor about it? "Wasn't it because of your animus toward Mr. Armstrong?" Cappello demanded. Davison disagreed, saying it would not have been a standard thing to do, and adding that she "didn't want to tap into letters to the editor chosen for publication as representative." "Because you didn't want to find people against it," insisted Cappello. "I wanted to do my own research," Davison said.

Cappello also implied that Davison was negligent in not either quoting the editorial itself or contacting publishers Wendy McCaw and Arthur Von Wiesenberger for links to people who shared their views as reflected in their "Butchering State Street" editorial. In Davison's decision to quote Marty Blum, despite the Mayor's long history of engaging in verbal warfare with editorial page editor Travis Armstrong, Cappello found further evidence of Davison's hostility toward her employer. Blum praised the State Street Beautification Project. Davison said that she called the Botanic Garden and Santa Barbara Beautiful seeking their opinion on tree-removal, but by deadline had not received a return call from either of them.

To counter the allegation that the News-Press discriminated against these employees for participating in legally protected union activity, Cappello had Davison identify from published photographs half a dozen others who were not fired by the News-Press despite their documented participation in union rallies and their wearing of "McCaw, Obey the Law" T-Shirts.

The NLRB is seeking reinstatement of all of the fired employees, with back pay plus interest and all benefits retroactively applied. Even were the judge to decide that the workers were fired for union activity, however, Cappello claimed that if he can show that "either before or after they were terminated, they made statements of dislike or disparagement of the product, they should not have to be hired back."

On Friday, September 7, the NLRB is scheduled to call union organizer Dawn Hobbs, among others.

Click here to read Nick Welsh's report from Davison's testimony from earlier today.

Story Help (Click-ability)
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Comments

Discussion Guidelines

Unless something extraordinary happens as this trial winds down, its pretty clear that Capello failed miserably in his bid to convince anyone that reporters were fired for anything except retaliation for federally protected union activity. Worse for Ampersand, he didn't provide a shred of evidence that "publisher" McCaw has a clue what she's doing.

In other words, it's over. Anyone with any sense would be making discrete calls to companies like McClatchy and Lee Enterprises and positioning the paper for a quick fire sale. Even in the state it's in, the paper and its real estate holdings should be worth at least $40 to $50MM, or about half of what Lady McCaw paid. With a loss like that and a good CPA firm, she shouldn't have to pay taxes for the rest of her life.

emptynewsroom (anonymous profile)
September 11, 2007 at 11:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Post a comment

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

EVENT CALENDAR

Previous Month | Next Month

Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

Local Weather

Currently:
Broken Clouds
Temperature:
73.9°
Wind:
7 WSW

Surf Report
  • Specials
  • InPrint
  • Top Emails
  • Blue Green Guide 2008
  • Summer Camp Guide 2008
  • Wedding Guide 2008
  • SBIFF 2008 All Access
  • 2008 Election Coverage
  • Best of Reader's Poll 2007
  • Calendar of Fundraisers
  • Local Bands
  • Kid's Mother's Day Issue
  • Made in Santa Barbara
  • Tea Fire 2008
  • The Brief but Violent Life of the Tea Fire
  • Nonprofit Steps in When County Stops Sea Sampling
  • Homeless to Move Along
  • Anti-Gang Action in Santa Barbara
  • Little Dragon Makes Big Return to Santa Barbara
  • Westmont Soccer Scores Big Despite Being Burned Out of House and Home
  1. Tea Fire Cause Is Determined
  2. Tea Fire Appears Close to an End
  3. Dear Prop. 8 Supporters
  4. First List Of Homes
    Lost in Tea Fire
  5. Plumber Fills Firefighters’ Tanks Using Undocumented Hookup
  6. The Unusual History of the Tea Fire’s Point of Origin
  • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
Google
 
Independent.com Web
Copyright ©2008 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
This is our Privacy Policy.