• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    Paul Wellman

    Steve Pappas reviews election results


    Pappas Supporter Requests Recount of 3rd District Votes

    Santa Ynez Valley Journal Owner Nancy Crawford-Hall Cries Foul


    Saturday, December 13, 2008
    By Chris Meagher (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    Nancy Crawford-Hall, an ardent and wealthy supporter of Steve Pappas—who lost his bid for 3rd District Supervisor in November to Doreen Farr—has requested a recount of votes in 21 different precincts in the district.

    Whether that recount will happen remains to be seen, as Pappas and Jimmie Johnson, an associate at the Sacramento law firm of Bell, McAndrews, and Hiltachk, LLP, have spent at least two days poring over voter registration cards, precinct rosters, and absentee ballot envelopes. Depending on what they find, they may or may not move forward with a machine recount next week.

    Nancy Crawford-Hall
    Click to enlarge photo

    Paul Wellman (file)

    Nancy Crawford-Hall

    For the past three weeks, Crawford-Hall has been editorializing in the newspaper she owns, the Santa Ynez Valley Journal, about alleged irregularities in the voter registration process and get out the vote effort by Pappas’s opponents. Noting in her most recent editorial, titled “We’ve been acorned,” that some precincts in Isla Vista and UCSB recorded a more than 100 percent turnout on Election Day, Crawford-Hall said there is “solid evidence of shenanigans in our own local election.” One precinct even appeared, in the county’s statement of votes posted on its Web site, to have more than 130 percent of its precinct vote.

    But County Clerk-Recorder Joe Holland, who is in charge of running elections, said there are no irregularities. He explained Friday that students move from year to year within Isla Vista, so when they go to vote, they may show up at the wrong polling place. In such circumstances they fill out a provisional ballot. Although the provisional ballots count as part of the Election Day “turnout,” they aren’t counted as votes until later, after election officials have ensured that the voter is indeed registered and hasn’t cast a ballot somewhere else as well. “This is part of the process,” Holland said, noting that more than 6,000 provisional ballots were counted in this election.

    Holland, at left, with assistant Jimbo McClure, checking the results on election night at the courthouse.
    Click to enlarge photo

    Paul Wellman

    Holland, at left, with assistant Jimbo McClure, checking the results on election night at the courthouse.

    Even though Holland expressed confidence that the process worked, he encouraged the examination to shed light on sometimes confusing numbers. Pappas hasn’t returned phone calls seeking comment. Crawford-Hall, who gave more than $100,000 to Pappas’s campaign, also never responded to a message left on her voicemail at the newspaper.

    Johnson, according to the law firm’s Web site, is a specialist in “election contest litigation, election writ litigation involving state and local candidate and initiative qualification, ballot pamphlet litigation, and post-election constitutional review.”

    The deadline to file a request for a recount of November’s election was Monday, December 8, which Crawford-Hall did, according to County Chief Deputy Registrar of Voters Billie Alvarez. Through Friday, Holland estimated the cost of the examination had reached between $6,000 and $7,000 because Holland had to hire staff to dig out the absentee envelopes, which are kept in sealed boxes. A machine recount, which would more than likely take place Monday or Tuesday, December 15 or 16, would be significantly more expensive.

    Farr defeated Pappas 51.00 percent to 48.73 percent, a difference of 806 votes out of 35,621. To put this in perspective, in the race for the 19th Senate District, which was considered very close, out of the 415,095 votes cast, Tony Strickland defeated Hannah-Beth Jackson by 857 votes.

    Doreen Farr
    Click to enlarge photo

    Paul Wellman

    Doreen Farr

    Farr has had representatives observing the process this week. Despite no concession from Pappas—the two haven’t spoken since before Election Day—Farr is moving forward in getting ready for office. She will be sworn into office January 6, replacing Brooks Firestone as the representative of the district that includes Goleta, Isla Vista, and UCSB and spans out to the Santa Ynez Valley. Last week she traveled with her future colleagues on the Board of Supervisors, and some county staff, to the California State Association of Counties conference in San Diego, and she is expected to name her office staff in the coming days.

    Story Help (Click-ability)
    Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    This article had no by-line with the posting Saturday morning, but the writer did draw the conclusion: "This does not represent a close race".

    The spread is 2.27%.
    Is that a close contest? NO.

    Less than one percent might be, but not more than 2 percent.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 3 • Thumbs Down: 2 of 3

    David_Pritchett (David Pritchett)
    December 13, 2008 at 10:51 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Thank you Mr. Pritchett for weighing in on this matter and making the definitive determination.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 1 of 1

    binky (anonymous profile)
    December 13, 2008 at 5:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    The irony is that Pappas did way, way better in Isla Vista and UCSB than any previous non-Dem Supe candidate. But if he wants to shell out the bucks to lawyers to comb through all the IV/UCSB precinct details, good on him... most likely he'll do no better than Willie Chamberlin, who still lost to Bill Wallace in the end.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    snugspout (anonymous profile)
    December 13, 2008 at 10:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    I encourage any of you blogging on this story to look closer at the situation. I have followed this race dilengently from the beginning. You are right, Pappas did very well in Isla Vista compared to candidates in the past. However what is most concernening is the turnout of voters in IV compared to the remainder of the precincts. I encourage you to look online and look closely at the votes by precinct numbers at sbcvote.com and get the facts. The race was a difference of less than 2% overall, this IS a close race for our district. However if you remove the IV votes, Pappas actually took the 3rd district by over 2000 votes, that is also unheard of in the past. And what is also odd, if you look at all other candidates that won, they won the VBM (vote by mail), Doreen did not win in this section. Why??? So, yes something is not right and those of us who want an answer are grateful for some one like Nancy who is willing to put her own money on the line to make sure everything in on the up on up. If the votes are authentic, great. If not, thankfully for once and for all the third district supervisor can be voted for position and not be a "bought" position.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 1 of 1

    TLynard (anonymous profile)
    December 15, 2008 at 7:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    My bet is with Joe Holland...and I suspect the weird numbers came from students doing their provisional thing at the last minute.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    mangomamma (anonymous profile)
    December 15, 2008 at 10:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    TLynard, I offer a far more simple and accurate scenario to answer your continuing questions about how all those votes for Doreen Farr happened.

    MORE LEGALLY REGISTERED VOTERS WERE INSPIRED TO VOTE, THEN GOT OFF THEIR BUTTS, AND THEN VOTED IN THE POLLING PLACES ON ELECTION DAY, thereby resulting in more total votes cast for Farr instead of Pappas.

    Gee, wouldn't it be nice if we could decide our preference in elected officials by picking and choosing who gets to vote and from where, and if they are only vote by mail or polling place votes that are counted to meet our preferences....

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    David_Pritchett (David Pritchett)
    December 15, 2008 at 11:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    David, You do not get it because you have not studied the numbers, therefore I will let you sleep in the dark like the rest of the district that can not see the black and white difference of what happened in our third district. It has NOTHING to do with a recount. But stayed tuned and maybe you will wake up when the facts are revealed. Have a blessed day.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    TLynard (anonymous profile)
    December 16, 2008 at 7:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Well, it is fine for Pappas to scrutinize all he wants. But chances are, he'll lose.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    snugspout (anonymous profile)
    December 16, 2008 at 7:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    TLynard's analysis of the vote is historically inaccurate and flawed. The right way to look at it is this: How would Pappas have done if the students' votes had split the same way as the rest of the South Coast? Remember, the District is NOT made up of just Isla Vista and the North County. There are about 9,000 people in the Goleta Valley portion of the 3rd District and they voted OVERWHEMINGLY for Farr.

    And why should IV people in the 3rd District be allowed to vote? Well many are PERMANENT, LONGTIME residents and IV homeowners. As to students who come and live here "only" 3-4 years, they are residents just as much as the military personnel posted for only a year at Vandenberg, and just as much as the average Californian who moves about every 2 years. And through sales and gas taxes, students probably pay proportionately MORE in taxes as a percentage of their income that the rest of us.

    The 14th amendment says students get to vote and attempts to denigrate or marginalize their votes are transparently both self-serving and un-American.

    Further, it's hypocritical for Pappas who gave away to students thousands of dollars of freebees - pens, pizzas, sandwiches and tee shirts - to now have his supporters try to dis-enfranchise the voters he so cynically courted.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    Richard_Saunders (anonymous profile)
    December 16, 2008 at 8:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    TLynard...

    I have been and continue to sleep quite soundly knowing that the Third District Supervisorial contest is completely settled with Doreen Farr still the winner with the decisive, now 2.26% margin of victory.

    Even though he lost this election, Steve Pappas actually had some future political and public service opportunity considering his moderate positions and his healthy vote tally and mostly positive-themed campaign. Not any more.

    Now, he will be remembered only for spending someone else's $10 thousand for a recount that garnered just ONE vote gain.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    David_Pritchett (David Pritchett)
    December 16, 2008 at 9:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    If Pappas gets somebody to pay $100K to scrutinize the legitimacy of every IV/UCSB vote, we all gain... Holland will appreciate it, and the system will end up stronger.

    In all probability Pappas will find he still lost the election however. Maybe he'll turn up some minor irregularity that matters at the 0.1% level. But 2.3% changes are really unlikely... if they existed we'd have had Supervisor Chamberlin from 1992 to 2000.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    snugspout (anonymous profile)
    December 16, 2008 at 8:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Wouldn't it be wonderful if all the Republicans so concerned about the integrity of the electoral system suddenly became interested in the rigged general elections of 2000 and 2004? Dishonest voting technology companies such as Diebold and Sequoia continue to operate despite plenty of evidence that they consirpired with the RNC in both 2000 and 2004 and directly with the White House in the months leading up to the John Kerry "defeat". Yet, the mainstream media and public at large are mostly clueless about how corrupt and unreliable our system remains.

    Why is this important? If George W. Bush had not been allowed to illegally occupy the Oval Office, clearly he would not have been in the position to do the damage he did.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    emptynewsroom (anonymous profile)
    December 17, 2008 at 8:51 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Clear Sky
    Temperature:
    51.1°
    Wind:
    6 NNW

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    • CAMA Presents the Shanghai Symphony
    • Elings Park Expansion Shot Down
    • Before I Be Your Dog …
    • Flobots Return with New Record, New Vision
    • Autism Attacked Alternatively
    1. Eating Animals
    2. Montecito Pet Shop to Sell Only Rescued Dogs
    3. Producer Must Pay Landscaper
    4. High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    5. Teacher in Trouble
    6. Nothing to Hide Anymore
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.