Print friendly
E-mail story
Contact an Editor
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
del.icio.us.
Digg!
furl
google
newsvine
reddit
technorati
Facebook
Yahoo!“We often think that citizenship is a real cut-and-dried determination,” said UCSB Law and Society Professor Jacqueline Stevens, in a recent interview on KCLU’s Crosstalk, “but there are a lot of areas where the question is a little bit more grey.”
According to Stevens, who published a study in the June 23 issue of The Nation, immigration laws are so convoluted that U.S. citizens and legal residents are being deported to Mexico and other countries on a regular basis. Stevens studied a large number of cases filed against ICE, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, by the ACLU and other civil rights groups on behalf of legal residents and citizens who were wrongfully detained or deported. “Detaining and deporting U.S. citizens amounts to false imprisonment, which is a felony,” said Stevens.
These lawsuits against ICE have cost taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees and damages paid to claimants, according to Stevens. She quoted Kara Hartzler, an attorney at the Florence Immigrant and Refugee Rights Project (FIRRP), as saying, “The deportation of US citizens is not happening monthly, or weekly, but every day.”
Stevens attributed this phenomenon to the confusing nature of immigration laws but also to racial profiling. According to her findings, “The profiling of Mexican-Americans is based largely on last name and not appearance.” Among several cases, she cited the example of Robert, a U.S. citizen who served an 18-month sentence jail sentence before being transferred to an ICE detention center for over a year and eventually being deported. Stevens says Robert is “phenotypically ‘white’” but his Hispanic surname caused immigration officials to doubt his citizenship and deport him. After returning to the U.S. and being deported a second time, Robert was caught trying to enter the country illegally. He was convicted of impersonating a U.S. citizen and sentenced to three years in prison, which he served until an immigration judge allowed him to present his case to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, where he was informed that he had been a citizen since 1983.
In addition to the strain on tax dollars and ICE resources, these mistaken deportations obviously cause huge problems for those unfortunate citizens who are detained. “These people have lives and families and jobs, and close attachments to where they live, that they’re missing out on while they’re being held in detention,” said Stevens.
ICE has no jurisdiction over U.S. citizens and it claims that instances of citizens being deported are rare. However, Stevens counters that in reality, “ICE detains thousands of people who were born in the United States and puts the burden of proving citizenship on them. Often they are people who have limited communications skills and even more limited knowledge about their rights.”
Citizenship can often be difficult to prove or establish, especially in the case of foreign-born citizens as different laws apply to different birth years. According to Stevens, in some cases, “immigration judges simply ignore the law and ignore court precedent,” issuing determinations of deportation to individuals who qualify as citizens, but do not appear to be without investigation.
“The number of people held in detention centers around the country,” Stevens reported in her radio interview, “are between 22 [thousand] and 30 thousand.” The recent nationwide raids on factories and homes can only mean more mistaken deportations and detentions, not only for laborers but also for citizens from all walks of life. Recent memory will attest to the 2007 incident involving a predawn raid on an apartment in Isla Vista in which a UCSB student of Korean descent was arrested, while ICE agents were actually looking to detain and question her roommate, an Iranian graduate student, about her legal status. Stevens commented on the incident, saying, “The aggressive and unlawful tactics of ICE are inevitably going to lead to the harassment and false imprisonment of residents and U.S. citizens who are lawfully in this country.”
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.
Previous Month
Comments
Discussion Guidelines
Instead of going after illegal immigrants, that can lead to mistakes. We must enact the Federal SAVE ACT (H.R.4088) and go after the real culprits. They are the predatory businesses that ignore Immigration laws. Once caught employers should have the heaviest penalties thrown against them. Unless they have used the government E-verify data base and those hired have been shown to be legal. Then penalties should be harsh and severe. They are stealing jobs from citizens and legal residents, which should be classed as a 'A' felony. If convicted should be heavily fined, business assets confiscated to add funds to ICE. If caught with more than five illegal immigrants in their employ, should be locked away for at least 5 years. No half-measures like using factory managers as a scrapegoat. No matter their highest echelon, no Chairman, CEO, Director should be able to shun our laws.
Within a short space of time, no corporate officer would dare to side-step the law, knowing full-well a conviction could be a prison cell. Unsuppressed facts at NUMBERSUSA.
Brittanicus (anonymous profile)
July 16, 2008 at 7:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Hmm why is it that when a liberal professor, or any other liberal for that matter, (Bill, Hillary, Al Gore) wants to make a persuasive point, they come up with some fictitous character we are supposed to feel pity for, or an isolated case to illustrate it? That is what passes for "research" these days. Anything with this approach is immediately suspect.
Take the case of umm ...Robert. Poor Robert (Don't they mean Roberto? Strange how he has a "phenotypical" white first name as well) became a citizen in 1983, but somehow has nothing to prove it and keeps getting deported because his last name is ummm.. Sanchez. But he looks phenotypically white you see (whatever that means), so the only reason he is being deported is not because of the color of his skin, or the fact that he is undocumented, but because of his hispanic last name.
The conclusion you are being drawn to believe is that, well, It happened to poor Robert (if you believe this made up BS) so therefore it must be happening to every single "phenotypically white" person with a Hispanic last name! Therefore, we must stop this injustice and stop enforcing immigration laws altogether so this never ever happens again! I guess,,, or what exactly is the point of this research? Obviously agenda- driven. You know, the kind that finds the results first and then finds a single usually fictitious- example to "prove" it? Whatever happened to true research that is based on statistics and multiple cases instead of the exception, and something other than liberal politics by a phenotypical self loathing white professor? oops! I profiled (gasp). Sorry I just based that assumption on her last name - Stevens. Please forgive me.
This kind of non-research is insulting to the intelligence, a professor should be held to a higher standard. But we all know what the agenda is here, to stop deporting people altogether - the sad thing is that the college students soak it up, assuming a professor must know what they are professing about. Shameful.
RForsyth (anonymous profile)
July 17, 2008 at 12:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Post a comment