• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    Capps Votes to Draw on Strategic Petroleum Reserve

    Bill Fails to Garner Two-Thirds Majority


    Thursday, July 24, 2008
    By Alexandra Vaughan
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    Congresswoman Lois Capps voted for a failed bill to ease rising gas prices by drawing on the nation’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Known as the Consumer Energy Supply Act of 2008, HR6578 would have allowed for the release of sweet, light crude to be replaced by heavier crude eventually. The bill specified that the reserve, meant to be drawn upon in case of national emergency, would not drop below 90% capacity. It made "common sense" as the national economy has reached a crisis point, said Capps, in a press release explaining her support. As opposed to President Bush's plan to explore new coastal drilling possibilities - which would have no effect in the short-run - this legislation would generate almost immediate results, she said, citing similar steps taken by previous presidents which "brought down oil prices by between 9% and 33% within weeks. . . . While my constituents across the South and Central Coast are finding it hard to afford to go to the grocery store, take their kids to soccer and even get to work, the big oil companies are once again reporting record profits." Every Democrat present at voting time voted in favor of the bill, but the final tally of 268 to 157 failed to garner the two-thirds majority needed for it to pass.

    Story Help (Click-ability)
    Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    Lois I hope you read this. The world has passed the point where half the oil nature has provided us in underground basins has now been used up. That is the easy oil, the first half. The second half is much harder to extract. More expensive to extract. The only response to this geological fact that makes sense is to use less. That means conservation big time. This is not a one time event like a hurricane or war. It is permanent. Please inform yourself, the facts are out there. From a supporter.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    gaviotamilitia (anonymous profile)
    July 24, 2008 at 5:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    "President Bush's plan to explore new coastal drilling possibilities - which would have no effect in the short-run"

    So.. then... tapping the federal reserve is a long term solution?

    "the big oil companies are once again reporting record profits."

    Should we tax (punish) the big bad oil companies (for daring to make a profit) and drive the prices up even further?

    What planet am I on? - I am joining the search for intelligent life somewhere else in the galaxy ...

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    RForsyth (anonymous profile)
    July 24, 2008 at 10:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Hey whatphotosb:

    Your call for a non-nurse as a representative is beneath your dignity and the dignity of this group. Lois has proven to be an excellent representative overall. I'd say that her being a former nurse has been a huge plus, and in addition she has long shown skills that go well beyond her nursing experience.

    And while we're at it, most members of congress are lawyers or former lawyers. Do you really think that the bang up job Congress is doing suggests that going to law school is better experience for representing the people?

    I'm not sure I agree with Lois on tapping the oil reserve but still, based on her record of service to our area, Lois deserves our support and admiration. Plus your scorn does nothing to elevate the discussion we need to work on our real problems. Please lighten up a bit.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    Richard_Saunders (anonymous profile)
    July 25, 2008 at 8:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Richard_Saunders, you should be attacking whatphotosb's stance for being wrong, not for him attacking the record of Louis Capps.

    By lifting the moratorium on offshore drilling, I don't believe that localities would have any say in whether they can drill off of their shores. This needs to be addressed. Lift the moratorium, but allow states and local communities some time first to either ban or allow the activity off of their coastline. The local community should have the most power, or say, in the matter, then the state level can make a ruling for those areas which have not legislated a stance. The Federal Government owns the "land", but this is a property rights issue as well since oil spills have been known to occur.

    Assuming we don't have much oil left, it is probably good that the price of oil is high. That allows the market to find alternative solutions to our energy problems. The reserve should be kept for a real emergency, like when Israel coerces our leaders into supporting a bombing campaign against Iran.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    loonpt (anonymous profile)
    July 25, 2008 at 9:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    loonpt,

    I think I'm entitled to voice my views on any part of any comment. What I objected to was a dismissal of Lois's credentials or effectiveness because one of her prior careers was nursing. I believe that attack to be unfair and that's what I said.

    In addition, while I probably don't agree with opening up the reserve, I wouldn't dismiss Lois or her entire record just because I disagree with this particular vote. I also don't agree with a couple of other votes she has made.

    However, overall, Lois has been a terrific Congress person and representative of this district and I think that callow or vicious remarks directed add much heat and little light to what should be an intelligent discussion.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    Richard_Saunders (anonymous profile)
    July 25, 2008 at 11:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    If liberals are to blame for high gas prices, who is to blame for Enron, the mortgage meltdown, lousy health insurance, inflation, the billions we are wasting in Iraq, the immigration mess, etc?

    Republicans talk about personal responsibility but rarely take any. Did liberals cause 3 mile Island?

    No, liberals voted for the voting rights act, Medicare, child labor laws, fireproof pajamas for children...the list goes on.
    Republicans basically believe in the golden rule: people with the gold should make the rules. It will be fun to see how many law and order Republicans and their donors have been evading paying taxes by stashing cash in Lichtenstein banks, now that their cover has been blown.

    To me, a liberal is someone who looks out for someone besides him or herself.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    Richard_Saunders (anonymous profile)
    July 25, 2008 at 4:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Richard_Saunders is to blame for high gas prices.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    RForsyth (anonymous profile)
    July 27, 2008 at 5:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Clear Sky
    Temperature:
    62.1°
    Wind:
    7 SSE

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    • CAMA Presents the Shanghai Symphony
    • Elings Park Expansion Shot Down
    • Before I Be Your Dog …
    • Flobots Return with New Record, New Vision
    • Autism Attacked Alternatively
    1. Eating Animals
    2. Montecito Pet Shop to Sell Only Rescued Dogs
    3. Producer Must Pay Landscaper
    4. High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    5. Teacher in Trouble
    6. Bella Dolce Bakery Is Born
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.