• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • Business
    • NewsFlash
  • Arts & Entertainment
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Personals

Photo: Paul Wellman

State Could Give Jail Funding

Board Recommendation To Be Looked At On 9/18


Saturday, May 10, 2008
By Chris Meagher (Contact)
Article Tools
Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
Digg! Digg!
furl furl
google google
newsvine newsvine
reddit reddit
technorati technorati
Facebook Facebook
Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

A big step in putting an end to the decades-long jail overcrowding problem was made earlier this week, when the Correctional Standards Authority board recommended that Santa Barbara County receive $56.3 million in jail bond funds from the state of California, more than two-thirds of the total cost of the estimated $76 million it will take to build the new jail. County officials are planning on a 300 bed facility in the North County. Currently, the jail located in South county off the 101’s El Sueno exit, is rated to accommodate 818 prisoners but usually has closer to 1,000.

Click to enlarge photo

Photo: Paul Wellman (from file)

The county was ranked fifth among medium and large counties in terms of how much preference it got, based on a points rating system. San Bernardino County topped the list. Should the recommendations be approved, the total of $750 million will be used to build 8,286 jail beds in 12 different county jails. The proposals were made by an executive steering committee, and the board will vote to make grant awards final at their September 18 meeting.

Santa Barbara County was one of 24 to apply for jail bond funding through AB 900, but one of only 12 to be recommended to receive it. “I am extremely pleased that the state recognized our crucial need for a new jail and our continuing commitment to the successful re-entry of offenders,” said Sheriff Bill Brown in a statement. “We still have lots of work to do before the new jail is built, but this is a major step forward. I want to thank my staff and the other members of our multi-disciplinary team for their outstanding work on developing Santa Barbara County’s proposal.”

Click to enlarge photo

Photo: Paul Wellman (from file)

Of those 24, 19 had plans for a secure community reentry facility. The reentry facility, which is also included in Santa Barbara’s proposal, would be used to help inmates transition back into society in or near to their place of last legal residence. Roughly 1,000 inmates return to Santa Barbara County each year. The reentry facility will have to be validated by the Department of Corrections Division of Facilities Planning, Construction and Management. “The competitive process in place for awarding scarce resources for jail construction rewards counties that have stepped up to help enact real corrections reform and improve public safety,” James Tilton, CSA Board Chair and Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, said in a statement. “The Board's actions today bring California one step closer toward building Secure Community Reentry Facilities and relieving jail and prison overcrowding across the state, furthering of the goals of AB 900.”

Story Help (Click-ability)
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Comments

Discussion Guidelines

YOU CAN PAINT A BARN ANY COLOR YOU WANT, BUT IT IS STILL A BARN.

These are 500-bed prisons, which include expensive, high-security cells.

It should be noted that the voters in many counties, to include Shasta and Contra Costa, have rejected having “prison re-entry facilities” built in their counties.

Voters need to research this program for themselves by performing an Internet search (Secure Community Reentry Facilities) to read more about this program.

Though the state concept has merit, it is a wasteful expenditure of taxpayer money.

rOEN (anonymous profile)
May 10, 2008 at 9:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Post a comment

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

EVENT CALENDAR

Previous Month | Next Month

Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

Local Weather

Currently:
Clear Sky
Temperature:
75.0°
Wind:
3 WSW

Surf Report
  • Specials
  • InPrint
  • Top Emails
  • Blue Green Guide 2008
  • Summer Camp Guide 2008
  • Wedding Guide 2008
  • SBIFF 2008 All Access
  • 2008 Election Info
  • Best of Reader's Poll 2007
  • Local Bands
  • Kid's Mother's Day Issue
  • Made in Santa Barbara
  • Zaca Fire 2007
  • 2008 Blue & Green Guide
  • Pico Iyer’s New Book The Open Road Distills the Dalai Lama’s Teachings
  • County Supes Venture Toward Oil Tax
  • For 3rd District Supervisor: Doreen Farr
  • Kathleen Edwards Returns to Santa Barbara
  • Wheels of Hope
  1. Carpinteria High Grad Tyler Dumm to Be Inducted into Santa Barbara’s Sports Hall of Fame
  2. The Hidden Costs of Mountain Biking
  3. Nuns Leaving Town
  4. Judge Joe Lodge Dies
  5. Crispin Leather Closes
  6. Up Against the Backlash
  • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
Google
 
Independent.com Web
Copyright ©2008 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
This is our Privacy Policy.