Kevin, we hear a lot about the fate of social security. I don’t expect to take Social Security for another 10 years. What can I expect to receive? Will there be anything left?
- Kate from Solvang
Kate, there is considerable concern about Social Security, and with good reason. Most Americans seem to be under the impression that their Social Security dollars are going into a huge pot of money that is earning interest, just waiting to be withdrawn at a later date.
The truth of the matter is that there is no “trust account” and there is no “trust fund.” As new monies are paid into the tax system, a percentage is paid to retirees in the form of Social Security benefits. If nobody was paying taxes, there would be no Social Security benefits.
This system works fine as long U.S. tax revenue is able to cover all obligations, including Social Security benefits.
There are endless projections regarding the timing of the demise of Social Security benefits, but most economists seem to feel that 2042 is the year that the Social Security checks won’t clear the bank.
Until then, what steps can you take to prepare?
Take responsibility, Kate.
You may be the type to save and invest for your own future, but if not, it’s time to start. Each of us has to recognize that we are ultimately responsible for our financial well-being. The old days, where the company we worked for provided a retirement benefit for each employee, are nearly gone.
Even some of those old, established companies are suffering under the weight of retirement obligations they simply cannot sustain.
Today we need to grab the bull by the horns, and plan our own retirement. Perhaps you have access to a 401(k) or similar retirement plan. Are you using it? What about IRA contributions. Are you taking full advantage of whatever is available to you? Do you discuss your retirement planning with your tax advisor?
Kate, have you spent as much time planning your retirement this year as you spent on your vacation plans?
Do you qualify as a Prodigious Accumulator of Wealth (PAW), or are you an Under Accumulator of Wealth (UAW)? In this column dated March 1, 2008, I reviewed a formula that indicates how we are doing as individuals when it comes to saving for retirement.
By answering each of these questions honestly, we might be able to see where we are lacking.
Social Security is not meant to replace our income, but rather to supplement it. My opinion is that the best way to plan for retirement is to ignore Social Security completely. If we can fund our retirement without including Social Security, then anything we do receive from Social Security will be an unexpected, but pleasant, surprise.
In a future column, we’ll discuss some of the nuts and bolts of when to apply for Social Security benefits.
Kevin Bourke is a registered principal with and offers securities through LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC.
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.
Print friendly
E-mail story
Contact an Editor
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
Previous Month


Comments
Discussion Guidelines
Social Security will be around and paying beyond 2042 if you can get keep a congress that is decidedly for it. I'd suggest leaning toward moderate Republicans but better yet stalwart Democrats. Solid Republican majorities hate government "entitlements" or programs that are popular with the people for providing security. The 401k is absolutely a great vehicle and can surpass S.S. benefits and really necessary for most without employer pension plans. We must remember that our financial systems are essentially pyramid schemes that require continued and balanced growth. The U.S of A. has a lot of growing to do to make up for the the last 7 years of Bush and this particular brand of Republican leadership.
johnathansmith (anonymous profile)
May 18, 2008 at 3:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"most economists seem to feel that 2042 is the year that the Social Security checks won’t clear the bank."
First, the "most economists" claim is dubious; that projection is based on questionable assumptions. Second, it is only true *if nothing is done by Congress in the meantime*. But that's not the way it works; Congress makes adjustments when they are needed, not 34 years ahead of time. The claim that SS won't be available is utterly fraudulent Federalist Society propaganda, intended to convince people that SS "needs fixing", which they propose to do by destroying it. This is exactly what Bush intended with all his talk of private accounts (which "most economists" of a rational stripe noted would be much worse than the current system).
That said, providing additional sources of retirement income is of course sound advice.
jqb (anonymous profile)
May 19, 2008 at 1:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Rumor was around 10 years ago that social security was going to be a myth when the time came due to pay out. So I quit worrying about it then. Had our Government been a fair Government and put it in a trust fund with interest to grow and build, there would never have been a problem with it. We all see the results of interest when we're expected to pay it through our mortgage loans, credit cards, etc. The babyboomers paid billions into the system, I am sure throughout their lifetimes and some of us will no doubt get screwed later. I am more worried about the effect it will have on my children, grandchildren, etc. They say it is the babyboomers that will break the bank, but that simply isn't true. The bank will be broken throught the Government's ineffecienty in the trust we put in them and their economic policy. The youth of today should be allowed to set up their own private trust funds for their future retirement rather than be made to pay into a failing system. The schools should teach courses on financial responsibilty and personal fianance. I think our Nation is headed for a complete financial collapse that will extend beyond the confines of social security and I honestly think it won't be in 2042. America is on the verge of Bankruptcy now. That's okay, as long as we have a Federal Reserve we can pay the private bankers loans (with interest) to pay out debts that have been created against our will to begin with ... ie the War in Iraq. As long as the rich getter richer who cares about the old and the weak who worked their whole lives, just to be left broke and hungary and possibly homeless in the end. That's our Government hard at work for the people and by the people, yeah right!. It is time that we took their (the high ranking members of congress, the senate,White house officials, etc.) benefits away from them and quit paying all of the monsterous severence packages they and thier spouses get just because they at one time 'represented us'. The American tax payer has become nothing more than a drone to support the elite. Wake up America and learn to fend for yourselves ...
57girl (anonymous profile)
May 19, 2008 at 7:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It should be pointed out that SS was always intended as a safety net, never to be someone's sole source of retirement income. The (f)right wing wants to instill as much fear, uncertainty, and doubt around this topic as possible in order to push SS, one of our most successful public programs ever, into the private sector. Keep up the good work!
tegrat (anonymous profile)
May 19, 2008 at 8:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Post a comment