For anyone following current affairs, Thursday’s Supreme Court ruling ushers in an exciting time. There exists a wealth of people ardently in support of the ruling, as well as an ocean of detractors. For whatever reason, nothing seems to get people more riled up than a conversation about gay rights.
But from a personal standpoint, this ruling holds greater meaning. As a young gay woman, for the first time in my life, I can look in my girlfriend’s eyes and imagine someday being her wife. Sure, we’ve talked about having a commitment ceremony, or some sort of gathering to celebrate our devotion to and love for one another. But now, we could get married according to the state. We could call each other “wife” and have it be the truth, not only to each other and to our friends and family but to society.
Like most people, receiving validation is one of my life’s main goals; I want to know that my work is meaningful and that my relationships matter. Validation has taken on a whole new meaning, however, since last April, when I told my parents that I’m gay and in a same-sex relationship.
My folks are perfectly decent people who raised me in a very loving household in southern Orange County. They are committed to their Christian faith and the black-and-white worldview that goes along with a fundamentalist perspective — so committed, in fact, that they’ve responded harshly to my coming out.
When I first spoke about my sexuality, my dad told me I was every father’s “worst nightmare.” My mother told me I had turned my back on God and chosen a sinful lifestyle. Not only do they not approve of my “choices,” they refuse to see my girlfriend and have been adamant about me keeping “that aspect” of my life to myself. Things have certainly gotten better — a few weeks ago, my dad said “I love you” before I did, a first since I’ve come out. But I’m still seeking that validation of how I’m living my life.
The issue of choice comes up a lot in conversations about sexuality. Is same-sex attraction (or opposite-sex attraction, for that matter) something people are born with, or is it something that’s learned? Personally, I’ve never gotten into those debates of nature versus nurture. Instead, I rest in my belief that every relationship is a choice; every time I tell someone that I love him or her, I’m choosing to maintain that relationship. On a daily basis, I decide to stay in my relationship with my girlfriend in the same way that every day, my parents choose to stay together.
The Supreme Court’s ruling validates committed same-sex couples in the eyes of the state. I hope that it helps to validate me in the eyes of my parents.
My search for acceptance was reflected in the speeches at Thursday’s courthouse rally, which was an emotional reversal from the previous time Santa Barbara’s gay rights community converged there. That was in February to mourn the murder of 15-year-old Oxnard junior high schooler Lawrence King, who was shot in the head for asking a male classmate to be his valentine. This time, the atmosphere was joyous, and I was overwhelmed by the amount of people — gay and straight — who showed up on just a couple hours’ notice, and by the gamut of emotions exhibited by the speakers and audience members.
But more than anything else, I was proud. Proud of my state, which took a brave stand for its people’s civil rights; proud to be a member of a diverse and eclectic group of people; and proud to be part of such a monumental moment in history.
I am a Christian who finds strength in the revolutionary aspect of Jesus’ teachings; as such, I believe that were he to walk on the Earth today, this would be his fight.
When Mark Asman, the rector of Trinity Episcopal Church, took the mike at the rally, I also found myself proud to be a Christian, a unique feeling for someone who finds that her faith has been adulterated by the religious right. Asman pointed out a handful of other church leaders in the crowd, saying pointedly, “We are not all the enemy.”
I am a Christian who finds strength in the revolutionary aspect of Jesus’ teachings; as such, I believe that were he to walk on the Earth today, this would be his fight. Contrary to what right-wing fundamentalists want you to believe, Jesus’ message was one of radical inclusion. And while my knowing that gets me through the hateful and homophobic rhetoric of the Dobsons and Falwells of the world, hearing Asman reiterate the message reminded me why I became a Christian in the first place.
The rally was full of animated people, with folks whistling and ringing their bicycle bells in support; the excitement seemed almost contagious, as dogs barked and children frolicked in the grass. But each speaker grounded us in the reality of the court’s decision: Today we celebrate, tomorrow we continue the fight.
I left the rally smiling with excitement and determination to continue working for equal rights. The day had been filled with emotion — a coworker’s eyes welled with tears as he told me about going to the courthouse to figure out exactly what hoops he and his partner of 27 years had to jump through to get hitched. A friend of mine had me listen to a voicemail from his brother who, despite the fact that they hadn’t spoken in months, called to say congratulations about the ruling. A young woman told a moving story about how, as a child of same-sex parents, this decision validated her family and her upbringing.
When I told my girlfriend about the ruling a few hours after it was announced, she said that it was great news but nervously asked if that meant we had to get married, like, today.
Not today, or even tomorrow. But, yes, someday. Because now we can.
Penny Patterson writes an online column about gay life in Santa Barbara called Gay Girl/Straight World. See independent.com/gaygirl for more.
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
Previous Month


Comments
Discussion Guidelines
Leave it to California to add legitimacy to deviant behavior. It is amazing that 1-2% of the population gets so much pub. Ahhh, mob rule...a Californicators tradition.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
scorphitman (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2008 at 2:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Scorphitman hits all the points one would expect from people who are incapable of critical thinking. Is the sexual behavior of homosexuals really any more "deviant" than that of heterosexuals? No. Is homosexuality really confined to 1-2% of the population? No. Is this rule by the mob? Of course not. We are a democratic republic, which means that the rights of the minority are respected as long as they do not infringe on the rights of the majority. This is clearly the case, as there is nary a shred of evidence to support the notion that the institution of marriage is only viable between a male and a female.
I am glad to be a Californicator in this case, and encouraged that at long last this prejudice may be coming to a legal end. Unfortunately, It will take longer for people like Scoprhitman to actually examine their beliefs and come to grips with this reality, just as it took many years for us all to accept the legality of interracial marriage.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
tegrat (anonymous profile)
May 22, 2008 at 5:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Tegrat, please check your facts re 1-2% of population. My belief system is just fine thank you, refrain from personal attacks. Webster's definition: Deviating - to depart from an established course or norm. If the slipper fits....
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
scorphitman (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2008 at 9:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)
You can use the dictionary all you want, but the connotation of "deviant" was clear in the comment. Also, the attention was about social and civil rights. Regardless of the number of people said rights are protecting, rights as a whole is something worth our attention and publicity. If one black woman is sitting in a bus of 10 white people and she stays in the front, that's well worth our time and reflection. If one percent of our population are earning their rights after years of suppression, I think there is cause there to announce that to the community and the world.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
ge0rge (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2008 at 1:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It is is true that homosexuality is a "natural condition", but not comparable to blue eyes and blond hair. Endocrinology studies indicate it is more of a "birth defect" than anything else. "Hypothalamus Challenged" might be a more apt description. It is also a fact that only 1-2% of human population is homosexual. By percentage inline with other birth defects.It is by definition deviant behavior. Call it a "Partner Pledge" or "Domestic Union" for homosexuals but don't equate the deviancy with heterosexual marriage. Better yet get the government OUT of marriage altogether. Homosexuality is not an excuse to cast aside norms of society. Homosexuals deserve respect as any other human but not an endorsement of their condition or lifestyle.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
scorphitman (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2008 at 4:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Do tell us to which "endocrinolog(ical) studies" you refer...
In the meantime, from the American Psychological Association Online:
"What causes a person to have a particular sexual orientation?
"There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay, or lesbian orientation. Although much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social, and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors. Many think that nature and nurture both play complex roles; most people experience little or no sense of choice about their sexual orientation."
http://www.apa.org/topics/sorientation.h...
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
binky (anonymous profile)
May 23, 2008 at 5:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Post a comment