• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Personals
  • Obits

    Fence Plan Teetering


    Thursday, May 29, 2008
    By Marc McGinnes
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    Wow! Whoever wrote the headline “Suicide Fence a Go” above last week’s story about the troubled Caltrans proposal to put fencing barriers on the Cold Spring Bridge [News, 5/22/08, independent.com/fenceadvances] really got it wrong. “Fence Plan Teetering” would be about right.

    And what the sub-headline calls “some opposition” is, in fact, very widespread and rapidly increasing public opposition. The barriers project is opposed by numerous community organizations representing thousands of local citizens and taxpayers, including the Santa Barbara County Taxpayers Association, Santa Barbara County Action Network, Santa Barbara Trust for Historic Preservation, Los Padres Chapter of the Sierra Club, Women’s Environmental Watch, Citizens Planning Association South County Land Use Committee, Santa Ynez Valley Alliance, Pearl Chase Society, Los Padres ForestWatch, and Friends of the Bridge.

    While there continues to be “some support” for the proposal, the momentum of public opinion is clearly moving to opposition in light of evidence about its deeply flawed justification, excessive cost, and failure to adequately consider a superior no-barriers alternative plan based on the recommendations of a leading expert on addressing suicidal behavior on bridges. So the story is far, far from over, and the tide is turning strongly against the barriers proposal.

    Go to www.cscbfriends.com for more information.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Clear Sky
    Temperature:
    54.0°
    Wind:
    3 WSW

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Best Of 2008
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Blue Green Guide 2008
    • Wedding Guide 2008
    • SBIFF 2008 All Access
    • 2008 Election Coverage
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • Kid's Mother's Day Issue
    • Made in Santa Barbara
    • The Year of Hope and Fire
    • Peace Corps Wants You
    • Tech Mogul Brings Laptops to Kellogg Kids
    • The Chaparral Is Not Our Enemy
    • Fishbon’s Art of Participatory Celebration
    • Rose Bowl-Colored Glasses
    1. Jerry Roberts Beating Wendy McCaw
    2. Just Say ‘Know’ to Teen Sex
    3. A Closer Look at the Wildfire Problem
    4. Who’s Your Farmer?
    5. Criminal Defense Attorney Caught Buying Heroin
    6. 24th Santa Barbara International Film Festival Unveiled
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.