• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    Ray Ford

    Hydromulching Nears 50 Percent Coverage in Forest; Private Lands Next

    Worries Still Remain About the Effectiveness of the Treatment


    Wednesday, October 1, 2008
    By Ray Ford (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Share Article
    Facebook Facebook
    Twitter Twitter
    Google+1 Google+1
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    Yahoo! Buzz Yahoo! Buzz
    diigo Diigo
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!
    Share on Myspace Myspace

    While six smaller fixed-wing aircraft ferry load after load of a thick green substance known as “hydromulch” from the airport, at Rancho San Fernando the huge Erickson Air-Crane known as a “heavy lift” sucks up from 1,800-2,000 gallons of it, lifts off, and within minutes is back on the ground ready for the next load.

    This thick green, gooey substance covers the burned area with a layer of coating that resists erosion.
    Click to enlarge photo

    Ray Ford

    This thick green, gooey substance covers the burned area with a layer of coating that resists erosion.

    At the morning briefing yesterday, September 30, there was optimism that the Los Padres Forest portion of the coverage would be completed this weekend. “Actually, we’re scrambling a bit to get our contract finished for the mulching to be done on the private lands,” Deputy Public Works Director Tom Fayram said. “But this is good news because this should allow us to complete the balance of the work by the end of next week.”

    Two thousand gallons of hydromulch is pumped through this hose into the helicopter in less than two minutes.
    Click to enlarge photo

    Ray Ford

    Two thousand gallons of hydromulch is pumped through this hose into the helicopter in less than two minutes.

    Fayram also noted that all of the stream clearing work has been completed, the sediment basin work has been finished, all but one of the debris racks is in place, and all that needs to be done is add “K” rail along Los Carneros for flood protection and clear out one culvert in the Rancho del Ciervo area.

    Though Fayram is optimistic, the bottom line may be what happens on the slopes of the Santa Ynez Mountains this winter. Thus far, just under 50 percent of the 1,531 acres being treated with hydromulch by the Forest Service has been coated. “Yesterday we had 231 trips made by the fixed-wing aircraft and 92 by the Air-Crane,” Forest Service spokesperson Helen Tarbet said. “So far we’ve dropped 1,800,000 gallons and the weather is being extremely cooperative. Without the marine layer in the mornings we’re able to get an early start.”

    By Ray Ford

    From my viewpoint at Windermere Ranch, the work was impressive. From below the aircraft continued to drop layer after layer using GPS coordinates to coat the ground to an accuracy of less than three feet. Simultaneously, field crews survey the drop areas to ensure accuracy, coverage, and thickness. Each night the data, along with images being taken from above, are used to determine whether additional coverage is needed. “We’ve had a few spots they’ve had to re-coat,” another Forest Service employee said, “but on the whole the project is going well.”

    Once the Forest Service portion has been completed, the contracting company, Aerotech, will begin work on private lands covering the lower slopes of the Santa Ynez Mountains. “We have just about 1,000 acres that need to be treated,” Fayman said. “That includes 18 of the larger ranches and a number of smaller plots. There were some owners who wouldn’t provide the right of entry through their property so those parcels won’t have the hydromulch applied, but otherwise everyone has been really cooperative.”

    While the National Forest portion of the hydromulch costs amount to $4.8 million, the locals costs will be much less. Of the $3.2 million for the private lands, 75 percent of the cost will be covered the National Resource Conservation Service, and of the remaining 25 percent, three-fourths of that will be covered by the state, leaving the City of Goleta, City of Santa Barbara, and county with expenses totalling just under $100,000 each.

    Though everyone is hopeful the mixture of recycled paper, wood fiber, water, and binding agent will prove sturdy enough to hold up to winter rains, there is still a concern that this will not be enough, especially if this is an above-average rain year or we have even one major storm that drops a ton of rain over a very short period of time.

    As one of those who lives near the bottom of one of the canyons noted, “We’ve put all our eggs in one basket by using only the mulch up there. Let’s hope it holds.”

    The Independent will monitor storm impacts throughout the winter.

    Related Links

    • Hydromulch Gallery [ October 1, 2008 ]

    Comments

    Independent Discussion Guidelines

    Ray, does the hydromulch have an impact on the vegetation that has already started to regrow? As you know, the manzanita re-sprouted a month after the fire and has been growing steadily ever since. Does the hydromulch knock it back to square one? Or help it along? Or have no net impact either way?

    gjanee (anonymous profile)
    October 1, 2008 at 2:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    I work in the same building as the Forest Service HQ right next to the airport. Those little AT-802 "Air Tractors" have been working like busy bees all week and this weekend. I stepped out of the office to snap some pics today and ran into an airport employee doing the same. He says their are six AT8's being used and each carries 800 gallons of hydromulch per sortie. I watched them take off and land for over an hour and noticed they would land and stay on the ground a little over 5 minutes to tank up, then get back into the air! The airport employee said the pilots start early in the morning and fly sorties all day. All this while normal airport traffic goes on around them.

    For those interested, the Forest Service has a little display setup in their lobby with public information on the hydromulching operations.

    EastBeach (anonymous profile)
    October 5, 2008 at 4:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    The concerns expressed above don't fully address the real issue: does hydromulching on a chaparral slope actually provide the intended results? This is a technology for re-vegetating strip-mines and highway borders, and the scientific evidence to show that it is beneficial, and not detrimental, to chaparral slope protection is not available.

    This is, 'my friends', another case of doing SOMETHING because doing nothing makes agencies appear irresponsible, regardless of whether it may actually make things worse. Typically hydromulching includes a mix of seed and fertilizer, but fortunately these were not included in the emulsion being spread across the hills burned by the Gap Fire. However, if you were able to take a close look (LP-NF is not allowing access, even for researchers desiring to study the effects of land treatments), the emulsion forms a dense layer over the soil surface. We've seen elsewhere it inhibits germination by native plant seeds already present in the soil; presumably it can also interfere with stump-sprouting by chaparral plants which are already probably doing a good job of holding soil in place with their root systems. The burned area is/was largely healthy chaparral, which is evolved to recover rapidly following fire - interfering with that process may mean that recovery is less successful, and thus there will be a significant delay in recovery to conditions in which vegetation protects soil against erosion.

    Regarding erosion, perhaps we will be lucky and the first rains will be gentle, gradually wetting the hard mulch layer sprayed on the slopes. But, there is also a chance that infiltration by rain water will be inhibited by this surface armoring, leading to other forms of erosion when heavy, wet material overlays dry, ravel-prone surfaces. Again, we can hope the effects are more positive than negative, but the data are not there to support the contention that these are millions of dollars well-spent.

    tdudley (anonymous profile)
    October 17, 2008 at 8:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Log in to comment

    Forgotten your password?

    Sign up

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Click here for current conditions

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Summer Adventure Guide 2011
    • Wedding Guide 2011
    • Best Of 2011
    • 2010 Election Coverage
    • Blue Green Guide 2011
    • Local Heroes 2011
    • 2011 Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • 2011 Foodie Awards
    • Stupid, Inept, or Corrupt?
    • It's My Life
    • Helicopters United
    • What Was Bacara’s Dworman Thinking?
    • White Denim Hits the Road with Wilco
    • Real-Life Red Tails
    1. S.B. Filmmaker Mike DeGruy Killed in Helicopter Crash
    2. Home Is Where the Hurt Is
    3. New Hospital Helipad Sees Heavy Action
    4. S.B. Symphony to Perform Tribute to Ansel Adams
    5. Bye Bye, Redevelopment Agency
    6. Stupid, Inept, or Corrupt?
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2012 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.