• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    courtesy Acciona Energy

    Final EIR Released for Lompoc Wind Farm

    Winds of Change


    Thursday, September 18, 2008
    By Ethan Stewart (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    Largely lost in the oil-soaked hullabaloo of the county’s current energy debates, the final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Lompoc wind farm was released last week, setting the stage for a Santa Barbara County Planning Commission hearing later this month. With the potential to power as many as 50,000 homes via several dozen turbines in the wind-rich agricultural land of Miguelito Canyon, the project, if approved, would be the first of its kind in the county.

    Since early 2006, international wind power firm Acciona has been angling to put as many as 65 turbines — each about 400 feet high — on some 3,000 acres of privately owned land south of Lompoc, adjacent to Vandenberg Air Force Base. While the forecasted energy returns — 285 million kilowatt-hours a year — have renewable resource advocates drooling, the project is not without an environmental downside, according to the several-hundred-page document released on Monday, September 15.

    According to the report by the Aspen Environmental Group, the wind harvesting farm would have Class I (i.e. “significant and unavoidable”) impacts on views, and on bird and bat populations in the area. As to the former, the bulk of the eyesores would be seen from Jalama County Park. With its coastal location fewer than five miles from the farm, the park would offer views of as many as 13 of the turbines: three along the base of Tranquillon Mountain and 10 more atop the ridge. Additionally, travelers on San Miguelito Canyon Road would be able to see a handful more of the modern-day windmills, while people using nearby Highway 1 would be reportedly inundated with the sight of new power lines and poles associated with the project as it transfers power to PG&E’s Cabrillo substation. (It should be noted, however, that the applicant has offered to re-route the Highway 1 infrastructure through the land it is leasing for the project, such that it won’t be in plain public sight until the edge of Lompoc City proper, according to Acciona’s Harley McDonald.)

    courtesy Acciona Energy

    There Will Be Wind: If all goes according to plan, dozens of wind turbines will be harvesting wind south of Lompoc by the end of 2009.

    Viewsheds aside, it is the potentially deadly implication of adding dozens of rotating fans, with blades 126 feet long, to the open air of the North County coastal area that has given the most pause to environmentalists. As the EIR puts it, during the estimated 30-year lifespan of the project, “unknown numbers of protected bird and bat populations may be killed.” While Acciona has promised, among other precautionary measures, to site each turbine such that it is at least 500 feet away from known critical habitat areas, the undeniable fact of animal mortality has groups like the California Department of Fish & Game, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the Audubon Society, and the Santa Barbara-based Environmental Defense Center raising an eyebrow of concern. The Environmental Defense Center’s Brian Trautwein explained earlier this week that the center is still reviewing the EIR and expects to have an official take on it before the Planning Commission hearing.

    Acciona spokesperson McDonald explained this week that the company is “very happy” with the current incarnation of the EIR and remains hopeful that its late 2009 target date for getting underway in Lompoc can become a reality. Admitting that the farm is a “fairly large industrial project,” McDonald took pride in pointing out that all of the seven families offering to lease their agriculturally zoned land in turn for payments akin to oil royalties won’t have to change their line of work. “We will actually only use just over one percent of the land we are leasing,” said McDonald before adding, “[Lompoc’s] quiet. It’s agriculture. It’s rural and we want to keep it that way.”

    Alluding to the controversial pro-oil vote by the county supes late last month, which has been decried at both the local and national level, McDonald called the wind farm “the right project in the right place at the right time.”

    The Santa Barbara County Planning Commission will be considering the final EIR for approval on September 30.

    Related Links

    • Lompoc Wind Farm Could Break Ground this Spring
    • Santa Barbara County Considers Harvesting Wind
    Story Help (Click-ability)
    Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    The wind farm can provide for our transportation needs as well if we build this electrically powered transportation system to accompany it. www.unimodal.net

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    LasBrisas (anonymous profile)
    September 18, 2008 at 11:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Before anyone takes a harsh look at this project and even begins to consider the drawbacks stated in the ERI, let us consider the alternative to this project and the impact made by drilling off our coast by big oil companies. There is no comparison. The unknown numbers of protected bird and bat populations which may be killed could easily be deterred with an electronic device such as a High Frequency Sonic Repeller. Let this project begin.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    SSolano (anonymous profile)
    September 19, 2008 at 8:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    So offshore drilling would be better with small oil companies?

    Wind farms are ugly.

    Let there be more offshore oil and gas production!!

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1

    osotoh (anonymous profile)
    September 19, 2008 at 8:18 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Having grown up in Goleta and lived through the huge negative economic as well as environmental impact of the rig disaster in the 60's it is incomprehensible that anyone would advocate more drilling here. Especially in light of the shipping lanes location, not to mention the huge number of negatives.

    I know we tend to be a community of NIMBY's, but who would advocate channel drilling as a positive solution for the idiocy of our current national and global positions?

    Ever see photos of what our coast looked like when OIl was allowed free reign? Right, more drilling.

    Wind farms? May be ugly to some, but the alternative is far worse. Bird strike can easily be mitigated. Build it.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    david3 (anonymous profile)
    September 19, 2008 at 8:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    This debate is so typical of SB. If everyone is right and no one will compromise we'll never make any progress toward energy independence. We need oil. We need gas. We can develop wind power, solar power, and nuclear power. They all have their pros and cons. None are beautiful. All have environmental impacts. And please, let's learn from history (i.e. the Great Oil Spill of 1969) to do things smarter and better and not just as an excuse to do nothing or push the problems off to "the other guy" or "the other state". There should be a special, supersize word far beyond NIMBY for what goes on in SB. And yes, I love the beauty here and think it should be preserved within the scope of the big picture. But I also like shelter, food, heat, etc. And rational, big picture thinking. Not so much emotional rant.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1

    RCMeltzer (anonymous profile)
    September 19, 2008 at 9:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    So ... how fast do these wind turbines spin? Do they spin so fast that a bird/bat can't avoid them? Dutch windmills are very near the sea, do they harm seabirds? If you can generate enough torque, perhaps you don't need so much RPM?

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    EastBeach (anonymous profile)
    September 19, 2008 at 9:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    By that logic, putting up any large structure like a power tower would also kill birds?

    Well, I don't have any dogs in this race, just looking for some solid info to form an opinion. The Wiki link says wind turbines typcially rotate at 5 to 20 RPM and optimally operate in winds around 30mph.

    I've found all kinds of web pages about "avian mortality" vis a vis wind power. Some claim its a problem, others claim not so much. Its interesting to see data put up by some people indicating causes of bird deaths are comparatively huge in other areas, and that the studies at Altamont Pass indicate its got a unique set of features that predispose the site to avian mortality. Still undecided however.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    EastBeach (anonymous profile)
    September 19, 2008 at 10:58 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Clear Sky
    Temperature:
    63.0°
    Wind:
    9 SE

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    • CAMA Presents the Shanghai Symphony
    • Elings Park Expansion Shot Down
    • Before I Be Your Dog …
    • Flobots Return with New Record, New Vision
    • Autism Attacked Alternatively
    1. Eating Animals
    2. Montecito Pet Shop to Sell Only Rescued Dogs
    3. Producer Must Pay Landscaper
    4. Nothing to Hide Anymore
    5. Teacher in Trouble
    6. High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.