• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    Ain’t Got No Dog

    Angry Poodle Barks at S.B.’s Homelessness Issues


    Thursday, April 23, 2009
    By Nick Welsh (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    YA FEEL ME:It’s election season and that means candidates for higher office are on the prowl, in search of other people’s pain to feel.

    Late this Monday afternoon at a West Beach park just off Cabrillo Boulevard—once the site of the most magnificent, grand hotel in the city’s history—Santa Barbara mayoral candidate and current City Councilmember Iya Falcone was hard at work. About 40 people had congregated at the park, sitting on the grass or on lightweight collapsible lawn chairs, fuming about, in the words of one hotel owner, “all the smelly destitute people all over town.”

    Angry Poodle

    Despite the intruding golden glow cast by the setting sun and a balmy tropical breeze, these people were not to be distracted by the ridiculous beauty of their surroundings. Throughout the two-hour vent fest, they complained about the hoboes, bums, derelicts, tramps, vagrants, and transients who strip-mine their trash cans for recyclable materials, knock on hotel doors to panhandle guests, park their big, hulking rust buckets on city streets, and congregate at Pershing Park to receive the free food doled out every Sunday morning by a religiously inspired insurance agent who believes himself to be the prophet Daniel. High on the list of everyone’s complaints were accounts of public pooping and peeing. One especially aggrieved man recounted in vivid detail being startled on his way home by a pair of naked human buttocks protruding from some nearby bushes then in the act of defecation. These people wanted action, citations, and arrests. They did not want to hear about 12-point programs or 10-year plans to deal with the chronically homeless. They wanted new three-strike laws targeting vagrants; they wanted people who relieved themselves in public to be branded registered sex offenders. To the extent anyone mentioned mental illness as a contributing factor, it was brushed aside as an excuse for miscreants behaving badly.

    Falcone was accompanied by two of Santa Barbara’s finest, who showed up to answer questions. One was a sweet young kid with close-cropped hair who said nothing other than to spell his last name. The other did all the talking. He was strong, handsome, and overflowing with that cheerful can-do spirit one wishes for in all public servants. When a few members of the crowd expressed exasperation with a lack of responsiveness by the police department, he was reassuring. “I am here 40 hours a week to serve you,” he told the assembled. “Say the word and I’m here.” The cops were on hand, he explained, upon the instructions of their patrol supervisor. And he wanted to show up to “support Iya,” he said. “She always supports us.”

    The cops union and Iya have always been tight. If the cops helped Iya project the sort of tough leadership the West Beach crowd wanted, she, in turn, allowed the cops to shine at a time when budget constraints are forcing 78 officers to surrender their cell phones. Given the fiscal realities, the department would be lucky to maintain 140 officers. But Falcone said she wants 150. Dramatizing Falcone’s point, the more talkative officer noted there were only six cops assigned to patrol the entire city during daylight hours. “Six!” he exclaimed. That gave me pause. With one-third of the department’s deployed force fielding complaints about bums for two full hours, what kind of crime waves could be occurring elsewhere? I was greatly relieved to find out later there actually were 14 officers on the street at that time—seven on patrol and the rest working gangs, canine, traffic, tactical patrol, or State Street.

    The only contrary opinion was expressed by a beleaguered older gentleman, gray hair swept back, who pointed to the RV in which he lives with his five-year-old son. He explained how he tried and failed to find help for his older son afflicted with a crippling mental illness. “I think the Golden Rule is still what you should go by,” said the man, who identified himself as a 62-year-old retired veterinarian. He threw a little Jesus at them, too, the line about, “What you do unto the least of us, you do unto me.”

    It would be convenient, maybe, to lock up all the “smelly destitute people” and keep them where they cannot inflict olfactory offense. There is not, however, room in the jail to fit them all. The inconvenient truth is most of the chronically homeless—the repeat offenders—are mentally ill. As we speak, mental health budgets are being ripped asunder by the State of California, struggling with a colossal budget crisis. Locally, the mental health funding picture is even worse. Obviously, it’s good politics to feel the pain of people upset about public defecators. But unless you’re banging the gong for mental health services with equal vigor, you ain’t even whistling Dixie.

    It turns out that Falcone—in her capacity as chairperson of a powerful committee with the League of California Cities—just voted for a package of ballot initiatives, one of which would gut funding guaranteed to the state’s 58 counties for mental health programs. If approved by the voters on May 19, this item—known obliquely as Proposition IE—would cost Santa Barbara County $11 million a year in mental health funding. In a testy exchange with Mayor Marty Blum this Tuesday, Falcone defended her vote, saying the league wanted the state to address its budget nightmare by rearranging how it spends state dollars, and not by raiding the coffers of city governments, as has historically happened. The mental health dollars in question, she pointed out, are state funds. Her league vote not withstanding, Falcone insisted she could take whatever action she wanted back home. This Thursday, for example, Falcone plans to attend a press conference decrying the very cuts she already voted to support. This apparent schizophrenia will cost Falcone dearly with Santa Barbara’s legion of desperate, organized, and angry mental health advocates. They will line up solidly behind Falcone’s chief rival, City Councilmember Helene Schneider, who has been toiling in the trenches on mental health issues almost since first getting elected. Schneider, they know, has felt their pain. And in this instance, she didn’t even have to look.

    Related Links

    • More Angry Poodle columns

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    A nurse who temps around the country told us that she has never, ever been in a city that deals with the homeless like Santa Barbara does. They are brought into Cottage on a regular basis, some almost every week, treated and released. More and more citizens and business owners are aware of the growing problem but the city leaders seem intent on making it ever easier for the homeless to set up camp here. Santa Barbara is viewed as a very hospitable place by transients from other areas. Why?

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    rileyoconner (anonymous profile)
    April 23, 2009 at 8:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Why? It's all Mrs. Childs fault.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    lordleadbetter (anonymous profile)
    April 23, 2009 at 9:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Homeless?
    Homeless, has been a problem in Santa Barbara forever or at least since the Goverment cut funding for National Mental Health facilities. While living my 20 yrs. in Goleta and visiting most of South County in one manner or another there has been homeless. Nearly all are mental patiences seeking a hand-out to self-medicate themselves. I did meet quite of Mid-West and East Coast folks who came here while the rest of the Nation was dealing with their own ressession during the 80's. They started out seeking employment but as I have learned since arriving in Metro DC any education or experience garnered elsewhere is considered irrelevant to employers not from your home State but I degress. The point is the Mentally ill have NO where to go, No Government will take them, No family wants them and No Business wants them either, so untill either they all die (What most people want) off or another solution comes up, live with your mental brothers and sisters, and SHUT-UP!

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 2 • Thumbs Down: 2 of 2

    dou4now (anonymous profile)
    April 23, 2009 at 8:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Santa Barbara has 2 options, just like San Francisco did when I lived there and they dealt with this issue.

    1. Make SB unfriendly to homeless people and make them head some where else.

    2. Spend money to help them.

    Of course SF decided to do a little of both.

    The straw that broke my back in SF was when I was standing there with a cop as she wrote me a parking ticket for my BWM (for being there 9 minutes too long), while a homeless mas a peeing about 10 feet from us into the gutter, right in the middle of downtown. The cop didn't flinch - that parking ticket means money for the city. The homeless guy doesn't.

    With the crappy economy the problem is only going to get worse. We need to seriously look at this problem and try to address it. I feel for the homeless, but at the same time I can't go for a walk anywhere in town without half a dozen people walking up to molest me for money. As a tourist town, that's obviously going to negatively effect the city as a whole over time.

    I feel for our elected officials who have to deal with these hard problems, but then again that's the job they signed up for and it's where my tax dollars are going to pay them.

    Having said that, GET TO WORK! Do something! Enough talking about plans, it's time for some kind of action to resolve this problem.

    Between the homeless issue and the gangs rolling into town from down south, SB is going the wrong direction.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1

    bronc (anonymous profile)
    April 24, 2009 at 12:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Why must I allow people to defecate on, urinate on, sleep on and beg from me my own property? Why is my desire for them to stop doing this so wrong? What happened to my right to pursue happiness? Would they like it if I crapped on their shopping carts? Their mental status should not enter into the equation. Respect for yourself and for others is a two way street.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 1 of 1

    birdbrain (anonymous profile)
    April 24, 2009 at 12:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Yeah, Nick, we all know you don't like Falcone and that your heart bleeds bright red. But having said all that, what would you propose for dealing with the homeless problem? There are clearly those homeless who need society's help, and there are clearly bums, vagrants, and transients who are here for the handouts. I for one believe that someone who spits on me because I didn't give a handout deserves no sympathy. So let's quit lumping all the homeless together and let's also quite demonizing the people who would actually like to do something about the problem. Very easy to criticize those who act; very difficult to come up with alternatives.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
    April 24, 2009 at 12:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Are the homeless edible? If we used them for food it would give them a sense of purpose and it would also cut down on our food bills. I suppose they'd be a little tough though.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 1 of 1

    Noletaman (anonymous profile)
    April 24, 2009 at 1:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    This is more of the same reported earlier here >>>
    http://www.independent.com/news/2009/mar...

    I understand and can empathize with this revulsion and discomfort represented by residents, property and business owners. But what can be done without further harming already ill, outcast or damaged people. The West Beach group's remedies suggested so far are not realistic and are punitive by targeting the "least among us." There are enough bleeding hearts who will fight to ensure that these people are not hustled off ("polite ejection") or jailed for simply sleeping in public places or panhandling.

    While I won't discount the complaints I can't help wonder how much hyperbole is involved. How often is someone spat on or assaulted by homeless? Is there provocation? How often does someone knock on hotel doors and ask guests for money? Is the peeing and pooing on any given property wall a daily, weekly, monthly or yearly occurrence? How is it known who did it all? I know we would not want these offenses to occur at all. But why is all this attention given to these 'lesser people' infractions when there are so many other enforcement deficiencies to be had of our average property owning people.

    Many of the complaints, such as trespassing can already be treated as crimes. Perhaps property owners can install video surveillance or motion detection lighting to discourage trespassing and assist law enforcement. It is your property and you may need to do more yourself rather than relying on law enforcement.

    It is clear that there is a national systemic notion and by default or neglect the nation assigns major regional cities the burden of response. These people are a symptom. We can forego our national and state constitutions and start locking these people up if we want to continue becoming a third world nation. Otherwise a national response is going to be required to solve these problems. The last several years this country has been acting as great masters of distractions, creating much chaos where we go. Then we blame anyone and everyone else around. No difference here. My suggestion, start reforming by not being a scapegoater.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
    April 24, 2009 at 10:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Bronc: What is a BWM?

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1

    billclausen (anonymous profile)
    April 26, 2009 at 4:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    birdbrain - your username explains your last two sentences perfectly.

    I have a question for you, birdbrain. God forbid YOU ever become homeless, or have a family member who does, do THEY have a right to "pursue happiness"?

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 1 of 1

    Gandalf47 (anonymous profile)
    May 2, 2009 at 12:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Gandalf47,

    Why don't you answer birdbrain's first three questions? Or is your MO to try and shut anyone down with a different opinion before we all find out you have nothing to add to an honest debate?

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    StillDreamin (anonymous profile)
    May 11, 2009 at 11:48 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Few Clouds
    Temperature:
    48.0°
    Wind:
    3 NNE

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • Within the Syuxtun Story Circle
    • Camellia Sasanqua
    • Whole New Ballgame
    • Gratuitous Gore on Highway 154
    • Saul Williams Brings Afro-Punk Tour to Velvet Jones
    • Where There’s a Dill, There’s a Way
    1. Travis Armstrong Is Outta There
    2. S.B. Bank & Trust's Rocky Year
    3. UC Campuses Dominate Rankings
    4. What buildings did architect Julia Morgan design in Santa Barbara?
    5. Rattlesnake and San Roque Side of Jesusita Trails to Re-Open Friday
    6. Sexile
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.