• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    Tranquillon Re-tapped


    Thursday, August 13, 2009
    By Ben Preston (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    Less than a year after the California State Lands Commission denied a proposal by Plains Exploration Company (PXP) to extend an offshore oil lease located at Tranquillon Ridge — a rich oil deposit located beneath the ocean’s floor near Point Conception — a new proposal by Sunrise/ExxonMobil to slant drill from Vandenberg Air Force Base was discussed in an informational session at the State Lands Commission hearing in Long Beach on Tuesday afternoon. Lieutenant Governor John Garamendi, chair of the commission, had been a vocal opponent of the PXP project — which included a deal struck with Santa Barbara environmentalists to end drilling by 2022 and place thousands of acres into permanent conservation easement — but supported the proposal to drill from land. Although Sunrise/ExxonMobil owns subsurface mineral rights beneath Vandenberg and is entitled to reasonable access, Vandenberg denied access to offshore oil reserves from land last year. Linda Krop, lead counsel for Santa Barbara-based Environmental Defense Center (EDC) — which, along with other environmental advocacy organizations brokered the PXP deal — argued that drilling from onshore at other locations would violate a state law that allows state oil leases to expand only if they drain into existing federal production sites such as nearby Platform Irene. Sunset's proposal would not, as it taps into the same production area as PXP's proposal. “This can’t occur anywhere else in the state,” she said, citing concern that allowing state law to be pushed aside would lead to more drilling elsewhere in the state.

    Under the PXP plan, slant drilling would have been effected from Platform Irene, but Garamendi, who had stated that allowing new offshore drilling was environmentally risky, soundly advocated the onshore drilling proposal as the environmentally superior alternative. Krop countered that the same risk exists because a new facility would have to be created, but Garamendi continued, speaking through the public portion of the meeting until after the commission’s closed session had concluded, causing most of the would-be public commenters, many of whom had been waiting for hours to speak, to give up and leave.

    Story Help (Click-ability)
    Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    What isn't being said in the story is that the PXP environmental analysis and EIR never addressed the comparative environmental impacts associated w/ PXP's offshore oil drilling proposal vs. the Sun ExxonMobil land based proposal. Without that analysis the public -- and Garamendi and Krop are all deprived of critical information in choosing the most environmentally beneficial alternative.

    After all, we've fought all these years to avoid and end offshore oil drilling. If a land based slant drilling operation can be proven to be environmentally preferable .... then PXP should get a stake thru its heart for good. In the meantime, what is the hurry?

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    4Oceans (anonymous profile)
    August 13, 2009 at 12:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    'the hurry' is greed by the few, the despicable, the oil barrons.... and the fools that believe them.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    spacey (anonymous profile)
    August 14, 2009 at 12:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    I don't know what hearing you attended but you clearly left off what was said. Richard Charter, Defenders of Wildlife, who has been the environmental community's voice in D.C. for 35 years on this issue made it clear that the PXP deal was not legally enforceable and that if drilling took place in the State's waters, for any reason, it would result in federal drilling and that would include Santa Barbara waters and elsewhere in California and the Nation. If anyone doesn't believe me just pull up the hearing on the web. Linda can try to justify her major error all she wants but no one outside of Santa Barbara believes her. There are 75 environmental groups throughout the State that oppose the PXP lease for just these reasons. Wake up Santa Barbara, you have been sold a bill of goods that by approving more drilling you can end drilling. If PXP happens you will live to regret. Unfortunately so will the rest of the coasts of the United States

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    GOOfy (anonymous profile)
    August 15, 2009 at 11 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Clear Sky
    Temperature:
    64.0°
    Wind:
    7 SSE

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    • CAMA Presents the Shanghai Symphony
    • Elings Park Expansion Shot Down
    • Before I Be Your Dog …
    • Flobots Return with New Record, New Vision
    • Autism Attacked Alternatively
    1. Eating Animals
    2. Montecito Pet Shop to Sell Only Rescued Dogs
    3. Producer Must Pay Landscaper
    4. High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    5. Teacher in Trouble
    6. Bella Dolce Bakery Is Born
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.