She said that the entire project will cost 6-8M even though the website says they have 2.1 out of the 8 Million. Also, the architect David Van Hoy had notified me that the price has been fluctuating with every plan that has come across, she said she felt as if she were misrepresented in the ordeal. Is there any way I can fix this?
Santa Barbara’s endless list of recreational activities may-or may not-have a new addition that has been a long time coming.
When the county approved plans to build the Camino Real Marketplace in 1997, the Wynmark Company, owner of the shopping center, donated a portion of land that was supposed to be used as a center for recreation. Wynmark’s Mark Linehan said that after considering many options and initiating feasibility studies on them, he concluded that constructing an ice rink “looked like the right thing to do.” In late 2001, Linehan said, the land was granted to the Greater Santa Barbara Ice Skating Association (GSBISA)-a nonprofit founded to raise money for the project.
In anticipation of this ice in paradise, the Wynmark Company has now finished installing the utilities and parking lot necessary for the construction ahead. The rink was designed by David Van Hoy-one of the head designers for the Camino Real Marketplace and Girsh Park-in collaboration with Blackbird Architects Inc. to join the ranks of only a handful of energy-efficient ice rinks that have been built globally. Besides using LED lighting and a heating system to recycle heat to the off-ice areas, the facility’s saw-tooth roof will have north-facing windows to allow natural light in while preventing direct sunlight to penetrate and heat the ice. All of this decreases the facility’s energy consumption.
Unfortunately, nonprofit organizers have not yet been able to raise the $6 to $8 million that the project was projected to cost, casting some doubt on whether it will in fact be possible to build an ice rink in sunny Goleta. The fundraisers have raised $2.1 million, according to Marietta Jablonka, administrator for GSBISA.
“Ice rinks are expensive to build and maintain. I really feel as though the resources should be allocated toward other, more pressing issues,” said Goleta resident Ryan Darby, a business major at SBCC. “As a resident of the area, I’m concerned with the effect this rink will have in a community prone to electrical blackouts.”
Despite these sentiments, Jablonka said she feels sure that the project will be a success due to the enthusiastic feedback she has received from the community. She referred to the results of a poll that showed a great following for indoor activities not only in this community, she said, but statewide. “I have been receiving emails from students nationwide who are taking ice rinks into consideration when applying to colleges,” Jablonka said. If an ice palace is constructed, architects have planned for it to hold one full-size rink for games and special events, and a smaller rink, about half the size of a regular rink, to host lessons and parties.
As for the energy concerns, Southern California Edison media representatives responded that “the area has many energy-intensive buildings, so the ice rink may or may not drain more power during periods of high-energy consumption.” One representative offered assurance that the blackouts that have recently rolled through parts of Goleta and Isla Vista were purely the result of the spate of wildfires. “When there is a fire that burns under the transmission lines up in the Santa Barbara area, it can cause service interruptions,” he said.
This story has been amended to accord with fundraisers' most recent assessment of the total project cost.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Good luck. I don't see why this obsession with ice skating. This is Southern California and we can have roller blading for almost nothing. It's not the same thing but it's close enough. This is similar to the mentality that insists on big water guzzling grass lawns which might make sense in England or back east when out here we should all have drought resistant landscaping. I am certainly not opposed to the community spending its hard earned money on an ice rink but would oppose any public money being spent on it. I suspect this is the reason they are having problems getting enough contributions.
Noletaman (anonymous profile)
August 19, 2009 at 7:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)
If it ain't ice,it ain't hockey.
I read a blog right here on this subject in March...
http://independent.com/blogs/sober-sp...
I STILL think...this is a great idea....who needs another hotel...geeze...greed over humanity? No way.
Good,clean,cold fun! That is my vote.
The fundraisers are clearly not a good fit...so get new ones. If we can build a skate park...we can build an ice rink.
Ty Warner would be an awesome fit for this.
The Ty Warner Ice Center.
Just think...a real live winter sport arena....good clean healthy fun. A great addition to the community.
Classes for kids and adults and HOCKEY!
Great fun and great exercize!
A devotee of The Church Of Skatin!
filmhead (anonymous profile)
August 19, 2009 at 8:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)
For those of us who remember frequenting the Ice Rink on the SB mesa all those years ago know what a fun and valuable experience Ice skating is for families.
Could the designers utilize solar and alternative energies to offset the energy usage? Yes.
I agree that lawn is sometimes bad, but Skating rinks are always good.
speaktruth (anonymous profile)
August 19, 2009 at 10:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Goleta does not need an ice rink. There are plenty of other activities that are well-suited to our community that would be more worthwhile (outdoor parks, or even a miniature golf course would be preferable). Is this how we want to spend $8 million? Really?
KRichards (anonymous profile)
August 19, 2009 at 11:28 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Some of us do remember the rink on the Mesa , but probably not many. Ice skating is not a sport for the general public in Southern or Central California.
It is a very indivdualized sport, requiring lots of practise, training and stamina before one can even begin to participate in the enjoyment of the activity. It requires balance, coordination, technique, speed, some acrobatic ability , before one can manage speed, turning and stopping on a dime.and performing in the fluid ways that we see in the Olympic performances.
All of the above are not bad, in fact good
All of this takes time and practise and MONEY.
Hockey is a very dangerous sport. I love hockey,.Being from Minnesota, it was natural to be an enthusiast. In Minnesota, many of got our first skates when we were just toddlers. It was good,healthy outside recreation, and those who liked it learned and perfected the skills needed, through LONG hours of diligent practise.
Ice skating here in Santa Barbara was very elitist. Not many flocked to the rink for the "General Sessions" after the newness wore off. Just the ones who were aspiring to be Dorothy Hammels continued in their grueling efforts to become adept.
Very competitive , which is not bad, but this also entailed competing in style. I personally made thirteen unique skating outfits for my daughter for practises and performing. And I remember , with pride, each of her little performance and tests. But I also remember her sore feet and ankles, getting up at 5AM for early practise time and picking her up at school to get back to the rink--for more practise, or group or private instruction. It is a lonely sport.
Yes, we had a rink in Santa Barbara before,and when the novelty wore off, very few continued to use it. When it was no longer producing income, it faded into history.
I do not think that a non-profit organization will do any better than the for profit rink did.
There are many ways for families to have fun and valuable experiences here in California. Look to what we have here already, instead of what a few want and the general public does not need.
Our economy does not support this luxury.
bajamama (anonymous profile)
August 19, 2009 at 12:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)
As a member of the family that owned the old ice rink/ putt-putt I would like to say that this is a horrible idea. The rink well be a boom for the first sixth months but once the novelty rubs off it will be closed soon ( I will give it 2 years) just like the old ice rink and the many roller rinks we have had in town. Can someone get info on the financial status of the Ventura rink?
sblocal805 (anonymous profile)
August 19, 2009 at 2:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)
People complain about taxes but don't seem to mind more development that will never pay its way.
Meanwhile, we have SO MANY other opportunities for recreation here. See http://www.independent.com/news/2009/...
Making and maintaining ice in S. Cal is kind of an oxymoron, with emphasis on the last two syllables.
Richard_Saunders (anonymous profile)
August 19, 2009 at 3:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)