Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Share Article
Facebook
Twitter
Google+1
del.icio.us.
Digg!
Yahoo! Buzz
Diigo
google
newsvine
reddit
technorati
Yahoo!
MyspaceCarpinteria voters will decide on Venoco’s Paredon slant drilling project when they head to the polls next June, the Carpinteria City Council decided on 12/14. The company recently turned in the more than 1,000 signatures required for a ballot initiative. Though there were concerns that the board’s authority was being circumvented-most prominently its ability to conduct thorough environmental review-the board’s choices were limited to approving the project right then and there or putting the issue on the ballot.
The city, under the belief the process is legally defective, is still appealing a judge’s decision earlier this year that the proposal is constitutional. Citizens have said the project isn’t allowed by the city’s current zoning ordinance, and that the project would potentially be a risk to the public’s safety and health. A spokesperson for Venoco told the council the project would still have to undergo review by other governing bodies, including the California Coastal Commission. While city staff has suggested the project -which includes an onshore setup of a rig up to 175 feet tall between City Hall, the Arbol Verde neighborhood, the Pacific Ocean, and the Carpinteria Bluffs that would slant-drill offshore for the next 30 years-could devalue homes in the surrounding neighborhood by 10 to 15 percent, Venoco predicts Carpinteria would receive between $15 million and $108 million from the project. A strong opposition to the project has risen, in the form of a group called Citizens Against Paredon, in what is sure to be a hot-button issue as the June primary nears.
This story has been amended since its original posting, which erroneously stated that the Carpinteria Education Foundation would receive $1 million from the project if it were approved by voters. That proviso was in a part of the initiative tossed out by a Superior Court judge.
Previous Month
Comments
This article is incorrect, no money will go to the Carpinteria Education Foundation. A prior version of the Initiative would have given the schools money, but the Santa Barbara Superior Court found parts of the Initiative were illegal and deleted them. Among the deleted provisions was the promise to pay money to schools.
masiegle (anonymous profile)
December 17, 2009 at 4:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Oil gets greasy.
Bird (anonymous profile)
December 19, 2009 at 5:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)