Don’t use your phone while driving - that’s the message the Santa Barbara CHP office is clearly hoping drivers take away from a January 22 incident in which answering a cell phone caused a motorist to swerve off Highway 154, tumble down 30 feet, and finally come to rest upside-down.
According to a statement from the California Highway Patrol, a 39-year-old Santa Barbara woman made the wrong decision in choosing to answer her cell phone around 3 p.m. last Thursday. In leaning over to reach the phone, she inadvertently drove off the road. Her vehicle landed in a way that necessitated use of the Jaws of Life to extract the woman and a passenger from the upended 2000 Ford Focus. Both the driver and passenger were wearing their seatbelts at the time. Once freed, they were transported to Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital for treatment. CHP’s press release noted that alcohol was not a factor in the accident.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
I see that same woman all over town........where is enforcement of cell phone law??
sbron (anonymous profile)
January 27, 2009 at 6:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Wow, that is an extreme case of someone being distracted by answering a cell phone! It does show the dangers of allowing yourself to be distracted by anything, especially while driving on a twisty road. The 154 already has enough reasons to make it dangerous folks, be careful! Besides the natural dangers there are psycho drivers on it that think it's okay to pass on the corners, to tailgate you even if you're going the speed limit and to drive erratically. So glad that these women did not die or become seriously injured!
santabarbarasand (anonymous profile)
January 27, 2009 at 6:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)
it's too bad she had a passenger with her that had to suffer the consequences of her actions. i hope she gets jail time for reckless endangerment. some laws aren't simply written to annoy, but to protect.
sbdude (anonymous profile)
January 27, 2009 at 12:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Just yesterday I saw two separate SB police officers talking on their phones while driving. Are they above the law?
laszlo (Laszlo Hodosy)
January 27, 2009 at 12:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)
@ Laszlo - Were they on the 154?
@ santabarbarasand - So true! I think DMV should issue a different, more intensive driving test just for those who drive the 154 on a regular basis, complete with a special sticker for your drivers license!
robert (Robert LeBlanc)
January 27, 2009 at 1:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Due to this accident, CHP is stepping up their enforcement of cell phone laws. If they see you talking on your phone while driving, they WILL cite you.
And BTW, it is LEGAL for police, firefighters, etc. to talk on their cell phones. I was surprised to discover this, but I guess with all of the communication and other equipment in those vehicles, cell phones are just one more minor distraction. Driving with many distractions is a part of thier training.
p38Tricia (anonymous profile)
January 27, 2009 at 1:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Bobby - no they were driving downtown.
p38 - thanks for the clarification, but I still think it would be wiser for them to use a hands free devise
laszlo (Laszlo Hodosy)
January 27, 2009 at 1:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
@ lasz - like this? http://www.der5er.com/blog/wp-content...
robert (Robert LeBlanc)
January 27, 2009 at 1:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I take the pass to work and in addition to the fact that almost everyone speeds--many of them *well* in excess of the speed limit--I see quite a few of them talking on their cell phones without headsets yakking away obliviously.
The cops really need to step up enforcement and not just occasionally park on the side of the road thinking they are deterring people by their presence.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
January 27, 2009 at 2:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)
@ p38Tricia
According to a CHP spokesperson, there's no truth to the statement that officers are stepping up their enforcement or have recently done so. He said today that officers have been handing out a great many citations and will continue to do so.
drew (Drew Mackie)
January 27, 2009 at 3:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)
HA good for her. It's just to bad someone was with her. I hope she does time for that. just like if you dui and crash with a passenger. More harsh of a sentence. Do the crime do the time. But, that doesnt apply to lets say Heather Locklear
805RunningCrew (anonymous profile)
January 27, 2009 at 4:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
So did the women get cited for causing the accident? Had she been under the influence of alcohol she would have been charged with a felony because of the passenger. Studies have shown cell phone use while driving is as dangerous as driving under the influence. Are we serious about safe driving or NOT!!
DarNel (anonymous profile)
January 27, 2009 at 5:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)
...I was halfway to Chumash, and my cell rang. I had to pick it up, I thought it was the United Talent Agency, but yet again, just another creditor.-Heather Locklear
4degreeflood (anonymous profile)
January 27, 2009 at 6:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
drew: Please relay to whoever you speak to that they need to do much more than they are doing. I appreciate what they have done, but the speeding is still absolutely out of control on the 154.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
January 27, 2009 at 9:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"there are psycho drivers on it that think it's okay to pass on the corners, to tailgate you even if you're going the speed limit and to drive erratically." -santabarbarasand-
Exactly! The drivers santabarbarasand describes are everywhere, and they tend to be even more aggressive when they drive big pickup trucks. (For those who drive big pickup trucks who are not speeders, this obviously doesn't apply to you, but as a rule, Chevy pickup trucks are usually the most aggressive drivers)
billclausen (anonymous profile)
January 27, 2009 at 9:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)
this article should have noted the weather conditions that day. it was raining, foggy & slick. i drove over the pass about 2 hrs after the crash & couldn't see more than a few yards ahead.
of course, the driver ought to have had greater caution because of the conditions but they are part of the story.
curious (anonymous profile)
January 27, 2009 at 11:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Why the hell isn't the cell phone law being enforced? Are the police going to let this stupid scoff-law off without even a ticket for violating the law and endangering a pasenger, not to mention others? If they are not going to enforce this law, why should anyone think that they will enforce a law about texting while driving, should one pass? The law enforcement people are as toothless as the laws they do not enforce. How can you respect them?
macman1 (anonymous profile)
January 28, 2009 at 12:05 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"I still think it would be wiser for [police] to use a hands free devise"
Actually, studies show that it's not holding the phone that's the problem. It's holding a converstation with someone who isn't there that distracts the brain.
That's why the National Safety Council is calling for a full ban on cell phones while driving.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/13/hea...
Rich (anonymous profile)
January 28, 2009 at 12:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I am so sick of people and their cell phones, just shut up and drive!
Analog8 (anonymous profile)
January 28, 2009 at 1:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Not a day goes by that in my 1 mile "commute" to my office, either on bike or by car that I don't see some moron talking on a hand-held phone doing something (else) stupid. Like not stopping at a stop sign, blowing through a red light, even driving on the wrong side of the road.
Not a day goes by that I don't witness police officers on motorbikes or in patrol cars witnessing these violations and doing nothing.
Now with regard to the woman on the pass: by all accounts, as she was driving on violation of the law, she should be cited for that, not to mention reckless endangerment, not to mention that her insurance wont have to pay for a dime of her damages. She might get the message, but I doubt that all this dialog will do a damn thing to modify the behavior of the vast, ignorant, plugged-in, tuned-out who will continue to risk their lives and those of rest of us on the road.
larrybic (anonymous profile)
January 28, 2009 at 7:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Budget solution!!!!!!
Enforce cellphone use while driving law.
Enforce turn signal law.
Enforce stop sign law (including on bicyclists).
Collect fines.
Fix budget.
RCMeltzer (anonymous profile)
January 28, 2009 at 9:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Hope she has to pay for the rescue, like mountain climbers. She took the risk, we shouldn't have to pay for it.
deblythe (anonymous profile)
January 28, 2009 at 9:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Has anyone else seen many of the women drivers talking on their cell phone while applying make-up and speeding/tailgating in the fast lane of 101? Now that is what REALLY scares the crap out of me. Apologies to all the safe women drivers - I know there are a couple of you out there :)'
Also, to all those that go 60 in the fast lane. That is illegal as well; a CHP officer once told me that is the ticket he'll hand out the most. Left lane is for passing not doing 60 on cruise control and not pulling over when people need to pass thinking that you are in your legal right.
laszlo (Laszlo Hodosy)
January 28, 2009 at 10:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Oboy; Weezie, hold me back. I've considered carrying a bag of rocks just to get the attention of murderous, or at best negligent, cell-phone-yakking drivers. Several thousand pounds of moving vehicle trumps a soft, slow pedestrian every time. Fortunately, like Dubya, I have quick reflexes.
All seriousness aside, to paraphrase Arlo Guthrie, luckily she didn't drive into the mountain--she went over the cliff. Otherwise there might've been a really ugly head-on involving some unknown number of innocent drivers going the other way.
GregMohr (anonymous profile)
January 28, 2009 at 11:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)
There is a high incident of people getting brain tumors from using Bluetooth or cellphone headsets. If you don't believe me check out DrMercola.com. Use the alternative dashboard devices for your cellphone, this is a lot saver, but hey if you still don't believe me by all means continue wearing those headsets...I hope this person wasn't hurt badly or her passenger!
imaginepeace4ever (anonymous profile)
January 28, 2009 at 7:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)
How about those guys in the giant pickups who "rush" or "push"....They speed up as they close in on the tailgating position, which scares the crap out of you, so that you have no choice except to speed up a little to get some space until you can pull over to let them pass. I think the cops really need to focus on these "rushers who push". They will cause death otherwise.
nonni (anonymous profile)
January 29, 2009 at 8:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Hi Lazlo,
With all due respect ( I agree with the bulk of your commentary) I see just as many male drivers blythely disregarding the law and yakking away on cell phones the "old fashioned way", holding them to the ear. They are usually "young" 20-somethings in those big pick-em-ups.
nonni (anonymous profile)
January 29, 2009 at 9:18 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"How about those guys in the giant pickups who "rush" or "push"....They speed up as they close in on the tailgating position, which scares the crap out of you, so that you have no choice except to speed up a little to get some space until you can pull over to let them pass" -nonni-
What such drivers don't realize is that in a collision involving one driver rear-ending another, the person in the back is at fault legally, and that a simple fender bender is going to cost them considerably.
Also, per the comment on the fast lane: I don't know what the specific legalities are but obviously it's common courtesy to move into the slow lane if faster traffic comes up. If all fairness, there is always going to be someone who has a geniune emergency, so I don't assume every single driver that speeds is doing so without reason, but I'm probably being conservative when I say that 80% of the drivers speed and follow too close.
One more comment on the fast/slow lane issue: I will often be in the slow lane when a vehicle will rush up behind me frantically and will simply sit on my bumper as though I'm supposed to move out of the right-hand lane so they can get past me. What happenes is that this game will go on for sometimes several minutes and then they will finally shoot around me as though I'm parked. (Even though it's the 101 freeway and I'm going about 63 miles per hour)
My favorite was when vehicle did this to me and worse yet, was flashing his lights at me, (remember, I'm in the slow lane on the 101 while this is happening) the problem was, the company name and number was clearly indicated on the vehicle, and the real nightmare was that I knew who the owner of the company was (obviously I'm not going to name names here) so I called him and politely explained that I was the reason his company had a contract with my employer.
On another occasion, a similar thing happened with my Dad recently as he was driving on the 246 between Buellton and Solvang; my dad got the name and number of the company for which the person was driving, called them up, and told the person answering the phone that they need to talk to the driver because otherwise they are going to end up costing themself and the company a lot of money if they keep this up. Such tacticts get results.
Are these people just aggressive, or oblivious? I don't get it, why is it *so* difficult for so many people to do the right thing?
billclausen (anonymous profile)
January 31, 2009 at 2:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)