• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    Paul Wellman

    Jesse James Hollywood leaves the Santa Barbara Superior Courthouse in custody July 1, 2009 as the jury begins its deliberation kidnapping and murder charges.


    Hollywood Jury Deliberating

    Witnesses' Credibility at Issue


    Friday, July 3, 2009
    By Chris Meagher (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    Day one of jury deliberation has come and gone with no word from the 12 men and women deciding the fate of Jesse James Hollywood, on trial for the kidnap and murder of 15-year-old Nicholas Markowitz. If convicted, Hollywood could face the death penalty.

    The majority of the jury listened attentively yet without apparent emotion as the prosecution and defense presented their closing arguments over a two day period.

    The defense railed on prosecutor Joshua Lynn for not calling Jesse Rugge to the stand to fill in what they called holes in the prosecution’s theory. Rugge is arguably the most connected person to the case: He was present for the boy’s kidnapping in Los Angeles, the boy stayed at his house over a series of days, and he was present when his friend Ryan Hoyt shot and killed Markowitz near Lizard’s Mouth in the mountains above Santa Barbara on August 9, 2000.

    Defense attorneys Alex Kessel and James Blatt repeatedly asked why Rugge, “the most critical witness of all,” according to Blatt, was not called to testify. “Rugge would be the logical witness to fill in the blanks,” Kessel said.

    While the question is certainly one that needs to be asked, part of the answer is that Rugge reportedly perjured himself in several previous accounts of the case, and no one would be certain what he would testify to on the stand. Still, the jury must be questioning the absence of Rugge—a name they have heard over and over in this trial.

    William Skidmore, who served prison time for his role in the kidnapping, and Hoyt, who is on death row at San Quentin State Prison, also did not testify. Hoyt could not testify because his conviction is under an automatic appeal to the state Supreme Court.

    But the evidence, Lynn said in his close, all points to Hollywood as having ordered the murder. According to the prosecution, he alone had the motive: a dispute with Nick Markowitz’s older brother Ben about a $1,200 drug debt Ben owed Hollywood. It was Hollywood’s van that was used to kidnap Markowitz, Hollywood’s automatic weapon that was used to kill him, and it was Hollywood who fled the country after the murder, not to be found for almost five years.

    It all comes down to his who the jury decides to believe. A lot of allegations Lynn made rely on witnesses whose credibility could come into question in the deliberation room. It was certainly brought into question by the defense. Much of the prosecution’s theory rested on the testimony of Graham Pressley, who was convicted of Markowitz’s murder though he was not part of Hollywood’s inner circle. Pressley said on the stand that Rugge told him that Hollywood offered him $2,000 to kill Markowitz, but that Rugge refused. Defense attorney Kessel called Pressley a “weasel” who was just looking out for himself.

    Chas Saulsbury, who drove Hollywood from Colorado to Los Angeles after the murder, said Hollywood spilled the beans to him along their journey, explaining the ins and outs of what happened. But Kessel, who called Saulsbury a “human bong,” alleged that almost every detail Saulsbury testified to showed up in newspapers around the same time as their drive. Blatt said Saulsbury had obvious mental issues and couldn’t be relied on as a witness.

    Hollywood himself took the stand in the last week of witness testimony, offering a much different take from the prosecution’s theory. While the prosecution alleges that Hoyt and Rugge murdered the teen at the behest of Hollywood, Hollywood said he told Rugge that Hoyt was driving up to Santa Barbara to get the boy and bring him back to LA. Instead, he claims, Hoyt did the exact opposite, an odd thing to do, Lynn pointed out. “Why would Ryan Hoyt do this,” Lynn asked. “The only evidence we have is that he did it on behalf of Jesse James Hollywood.”

    Friday is a court holiday and the jury will continue deliberating Monday morning.

    Related Links

    • More stories on this trial
    Story Help (Click-ability)
    Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    Thanks Chris for this clear update.

    Suppose it's a tough way for JJH to spend a long holiday weekend but he's spent many since the crime.

    Happy my weekend and life aren't marred by that fear of a jury's judgement.

    Happy and safe holiday to you all.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1

    SweetLips (anonymous profile)
    July 3, 2009 at 7:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Ugh, this is ridiculous. From what I am hearing the prosecution has not proved anything. Why the heck would they put up a witness like Chas, and leave out Jesse Rugge, if they were concerned about witness's credability. At least Jesse would have more direct evidence linking Hollywood. I know he did it, all the evidence points to it, however it is only circumstancial. This should not have been so difficult for the prosecution i am afraid they are gonna mess this up big time. And what a shame that would be.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 1 of 1

    mcurtin (anonymous profile)
    July 4, 2009 at 8:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Ridiculous that the jury wasn't required to deliberate at all over the weekend. The fact it was a holiday is unfortunate but this is a capital murder case and some things are more important than partying. This wasn't an especially long trial and because the jury is not sequestered, they have been able to go home every night and thus not desperately in need of a break.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1

    Justice (anonymous profile)
    July 6, 2009 at 4:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    JJH is arrogant and I hope he gets the death penalty. When he was initially in the SB jail he thought he was so cool. If he really didn't mean any harm to Nick, he should have gone to the police as soon as he found out Nick was murdered. Instead, he ran away and had a child so he wouldn't have to be deported.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1

    Muggy (anonymous profile)
    July 6, 2009 at 12:23 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    "Hollywood's not guilty"..... ??

    Not a Chance !!

    Hollywood has already admitted on the stand the Tec-9 machine gun was his own that Ryan Hoyt used to murder Nick.

    Hollywood's own father even tried to intervene through Jesse Hollywood while Nick was still alive & being held somewhere by demanding from Hollywood that he needs to produce "the kid" now to be returned home so Hollywood's father can have a talk with Nick's parents & pay them off a large sum of money to forget about the kidnapping - Jesse Hollywood refused over & over to tell his own father where he was holding Nick because he did not believe Nick's parents would take the bribe-money.

    The argument Hollywood had with Hoyt, once Hoyt returned from the murder & which Hollywood burst a blood vessel in his eye, was about Hoyt leaving Hollywood's Tec-9 machine gun at the murder scene when Hoyt buried it with the body, thus tying the murder back to Hollywood & his clan.

    It's my Opinion ~

    Jesse Hollywood is guilty of:
    - Capital Murder w/ Two (2) Special Circumstances;
    ...#1 (Murder during a Kidnapping)
    ...#2 (Murder of a Witness to Prevent Testimony)
    - Felony Murder (Murder during the Commission of a Felony)
    - Aggravated Kidnapping
    - Conspiracy to Commit Murder

    .

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1

    DEATH_PENALTY (anonymous profile)
    July 6, 2009 at 1:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    There's a lynch mob mentality out for Hollywood. No wonder he fled years ago. From what I've read here and in the Daily Sound, the DA has not proved his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and that, folks, is what's required, even for someone as apparently unlikeable as Hollywood. Thanks, Independent, for the full reporting!

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    citti (anonymous profile)
    July 6, 2009 at 3:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    I haven't seen any result from the real jury on this case, but when a defendant takes the stand and confesses to the underlying crime of kidnapping, the DA -- a good one or otherwise-- doesn't really have much left to prove. Kidnapping plus felony murder are both slamdunked by JJH's own testimony. I don't know JJH or like/dislike him...just see what's reported as testimony and that's very telling.

    If anyone in SB hears of jury action, please post soonest, thanks

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1

    SweetLips (anonymous profile)
    July 6, 2009 at 5:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    There haven't been any updates other than the jury is asking the judge legal questions.

    JJH didn't run away because there was a lynch mob out for him. He ran away because he didn't want to go to prison for the rest of his life. We weren't going to kidnap him and beat him up like a mob, we wanted him in jail for what he did to Nick. It doesn't matter if he meant to have Nick murdered, it still happened and he was the ring leader - that makes him just as guilty.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    Muggy (anonymous profile)
    July 7, 2009 at 3:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Chicago Tribune story linked on the Indy website says Hollywood has been convicted. Dated today, the 8th.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    mtndriver (anonymous profile)
    July 8, 2009 at 6:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Clear Sky
    Temperature:
    62.1°
    Wind:
    7 ESE

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    • CAMA Presents the Shanghai Symphony
    • Elings Park Expansion Shot Down
    • Before I Be Your Dog …
    • Flobots Return with New Record, New Vision
    • Autism Attacked Alternatively
    1. Eating Animals
    2. Montecito Pet Shop to Sell Only Rescued Dogs
    3. Producer Must Pay Landscaper
    4. Nothing to Hide Anymore
    5. High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    6. Teacher in Trouble
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.