Three South Coast men are facing drug-related charges following the July 1 conclusion of a month-long investigation into illegal marijuana cultivators and traffickers by narcotics detectives with the Santa Barbara Sheriff’s Department. Warrants were served at three homes: one on the 2100 block of East Valley Road in Montecito, one on the 100 block of Valencia Road in Summerland, and one on the 100 block of Verona Avenue in Goleta.
Upon searching the homes, three men were arrested for drug-related charges. Summerland resident Mischa Ford was booked into Santa Barbara County Jail on charges of conspiracy, marijuana cultivation, possession of marijuana for sales, possession of cocaine, possession of ecstasy, and transportation of marijuana. The other two men were cited and released: Donald Bullick is facing charges of conspiracy, marijuana cultivation, possession of marijuana for sales, and possession of Psilocybin, and Michael Shapiro is facing charges of conspiracy, marijuana cultivation, possession of marijuana for sales, and transportation of marijuana.
According to a report from the Sheriff’s Department, searches of the three homes yielded over 400 active marijuana plants, “sophisticated” outdoor and indoor marijuana gardens, five pounds of processed marijuana (with an estimated street value of $20,000), four grams of cocaine (with an estimated street value of $400), a “usable” amount of Psilocybin, several ecstasy pills, and approximately $18,000 in cash. Over the entire scope of the investigation $800,000 worth of marijuana was seized.
In a press release about the arrests, Sheriff’s spokesman Drew Sugars noted that evidence located at the residence showed that suspects seem to be illegally cultivating and selling the drugs outside the scope of California’s medical marijuana law. He also noted that Ford allegedly had sold marijuana in the presence of an undercover officer and that Ford and Shapiro were shipping pounds of the processed marijuana to the East Coast.
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.
Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
Previous Month


Comments
Discussion Guidelines
This sort of crime could be reduced dramatically if we would legalize marijuana.
Our current marijuana laws are impossible to enforce. Despite decades of marijuana eradication and despite arresting 800,000 people a year, pot is still easier to buy for most high school kids than beer.
Keeping marijuana illegal does not benefit our children. It benefits special interest groups: drug cartels, the prison industry, police departments, and government bureaucracies.
It is immoral to prevent responsible adults from choosing to use a less harmful substance in place of alcohol. If pot were legalized, alcohol use would decrease along with its associated social costs.
If you want marijuana to be legalized, taxed, and regulated for adults, YOU can make it happen. Tell your legislators to support California Assembly Bill 390. It's easy. Visit yes390.org
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
AB390 (anonymous profile)
July 4, 2009 at 2:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
What an absurd waste of resources, Santa Barbara Sheriffs: shame on you. Can't you find some real criminals?
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
micaelm (anonymous profile)
July 6, 2009 at 12:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Coffee, brewed from a plant, is working man's cocaine.
Cigarettes, rolled from a plant, is cancer's delight.
Alcohol from grains causes more death than MJ.
We have all heard these comments and arguments for too many years.
Drop these charges. Stick with the hard drugs that destroy self and others. Mary Jane never robbed a stored, molested a kid, used guns, but did hold responsible jobs. Legalize it and tax it. You want money for the state's depleted treasury, here it is. Instead of paying money to arrest, convict, and put them in jail, tax them for their produce.
Sheriff Brown does a good job, but I want him to leave the marijuana cases unenforced.
Arresting someone because they grow and smoke a harmless plant that commits no destruction of self or others while other major crimes against person and property go unchecked is like arresting someone because of the slant of their eyes and putting them in a squirrel cage until the end of the war. Both are arrests because of a crime not committed, but an undemonstrated, unproven, prejudicial fear.
What next, Elliott Ness spraying bullets while crashing through garage doors?
If anything can teach us that we are too close to fascist type police state tactics where victimless crimes are punished, this is it.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
Bird (anonymous profile)
July 6, 2009 at 1:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm sure you've all seen the show "cops" or some reality show where law enforcement goes around and answers 9-1-1 calls. On these shows, you see situations where someone gets drunk and violent and has to be restrained. How many times have you seen people get violent while under the influence of marijuana and nothing more?
Ideally, people should live a life of complete sobriety, but just as prohibition failed, so is criminalizing this herb.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
billclausen (anonymous profile)
July 6, 2009 at 3:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Psilocybin... mushrooms... ya, lets arrest people for possessing mushrooms, too.. that makes a lot of sense.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
loonpt (anonymous profile)
July 6, 2009 at 9:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)
But think about all of the jobless narcs and prison guards guys. Different role same stuff.
I do have to pause though, because if it is made a medical problem, just think of the patients and profits. The devil you know and the one you don't.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
swarfmaster (anonymous profile)
July 6, 2009 at 5:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Let me see…, during only a one month investigation, $800,000.00 worth of marijuana was involved, including 400 active plants, a “sophisticated” outdoor and indoor active marijuana gardens, etc., generated by three budding entrepreneurs, presumably working secretly in an attempt to avoid detection, and therefore at some disadvantage over, let’s say your average tobacco farmer…, hmmmmm? And they’re jailing these fellas? So, instead of only three, er, um…, farmers, let’s say we work about 300 green thumbers into producing this interesting cash cow product, operating under the same disabilities as our prospective jailbirds. Rather than going through the trauma and expense of exporting the product to the east, (not to mention that little ole’ interstate transportation issue), why not offer the product to some of our equally deserving locals? The cost reduction would increase profitability, reduce fuel emissions resulting from transportation, and likely work to reduce the staggering unemployment rate as a result of new employment opportunities that would emerge.
Furthermore, instead of wasting valuable law enforcement resources and the related millions and millions spent sneaking around trying to catch these guys, we would simply implement a change in job description from “narcotics officer”, to “security guard”. We’ve already purchased the uniforms, guns, helicopters, night vision equipment, etc. The only thing we would need to do is reveal the location of these farms to allow the former narcotics officers to take up their new positions to actually guard and protect the new, expansive, green belt that would emerge as a result of this promising venture. 300 resourceful farmers could generate enough revenue in a ten month period to put a dent in the budget deficit. 3,000 could do even better.
On the other hand, we could continue to waste valuable resources and manpower searching out active marijuana gardens only to be forced to watch the ultimate law enforcement booty literally go up in smoke. The least they could do is bus a bunch of loadies and a couple of bands up to the scene of the crime before they start the burn. While law enforcement would refer to it as destroying the crop, we could simply call it a music festival.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
Theguywritingthis (anonymous profile)
July 6, 2009 at 9:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Bill, usually I really like what you have to say and the message you have regarding this is a good one. However...
"How many times have you seen people get violent while under the influence of marijuana and nothing more?"
My answer to that is.. never. I have seen many arrests both on Cops and have witnessed a few in person (not me of course). In every case that turned violent where pot was used alchohol or another sudstance like cocain or meth was also in the mix.
My stepfather (a police officer) personally does not think pot should be legal. But when I asked him if he had ever seen pot make someone agressive he answered. For the refrigerater...yeah.
Just for the record your message is valid, I just think a different example would best serve your point.
Just my Opinion.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
Jhern (anonymous profile)
July 6, 2009 at 10:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Correction. third paragragh last sentence. "substance" sorry peeps...its past my bedtime.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
Jhern (anonymous profile)
July 6, 2009 at 10:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Jhern: I don't understand where we differ, I said that I have never seen anyone get violent because of being under the influence of marijuana (without any other drugs being consumed in addition to just the pot) and you are saying the same thing...right?
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
billclausen (anonymous profile)
July 7, 2009 at 3:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Post a comment