Caltrans wants to add high-occupancy vehicle lanes to Highway 101 on the South Coast, and held public meetings this week in furtherance of that goal. With an estimated cost of $425 million and construction anticipated to begin in 2014, the proposed project would add two part-time HOV lanes—one northbound and one southbound—between Carpinteria and Santa Barbara as the fourth phase of agency’s 101 Widening Strategy.
Representatives from Caltrans were on hand at two meetings, held July 7 and July 8, to present the Highway 101 South Coast High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Project to the public and take questions. An abundance of displays covered multiple aspects of the construction project. The meeting — part of the “public scoping” phase — served to “gather comments from the public on the environmental scope of the project,” according to project manager Scott Eades.
The first phase of construction is to be the addition of northbound and southbound lanes between Milpas Street and Cabrillo Boulevard — including the improvement of local roads and bicycle and pedestrian paths — and is scheduled for completion in 2012 with a budget of $53 million. The second phase is the addition of HOV lanes between Mussel Shoals and Carpinteria, which is anticipated to begin construction in 2011 and has an estimated cost of $132 million. Third is reconstruction of the Linden and Casitas Pass interchanges — including the replacement of the Carpinteria Creek Bridge and the extension of Via Real—with an estimated cost of $70 million, and construction anticipated to begin in 2013.
The objectives of the HOV-lanes strategy are to reduce peak-hour congestion, encourage carpooling and use of public transportation, and minimize the diversion of freeway traffic onto local roadways. According to the 101 In Motion project — a collaboration among the cities of Goleta, Santa Barbara, and Carpinteria, the County of Santa Barbara, the Air Pollution Control District, Caltrans, and Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBCAG)—research suggests that “without improvements traffic congestion is expected to increase to 10 hours a day by 2030.”
Currently, congestion occurs for two to four hours daily. Since congestion occurs when the number of vehicles exceeds the road’s capacity, and studies show that the number of vehicles on the 101 will increase with time, adding the part-time HOV lane would only solve the problem temporarily. Which is why 101 In Motion proposes a package of solutions rather than just one.
Along with the construction of HOV lanes between Santa Barbara and Carpinteria, 101 In Motion proposes: operating commuter rail on the existing railroad line between Camarillo and Goleta, with stops in Carpinteria and Santa Barbara; increasing express bus services within the county; offering incentives to encourage carpooling and trip reduction; rethinking local bus routes and light systems to prioritize commuter buses; varying parking rates to lower prices for vehicles arriving outside of peak hours; working to alleviate freeway traffic north of Milpas Street by monitoring needs and options; and improving overall operations and communications to make travelers and roads “more intelligent in terms of information.” The overall effectiveness of the package has been broken down into categories, with HOV lanes accounting for 64 percent of the package’s effectiveness and rail implementation accounting for 18 percent.
The final cost of this comprehensive plan is $833 million. Its funding relies heavily on the renewal of the Measure D transportation sales tax. However, the South Coast HOV Project alone would only cost $425 million, with $140 million already secured through Measure A regional sales tax renewal funds and additional funding anticipated from SBCAG’s Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP). Although this leaves a $285 million gap, Caltrans’s Jim Shivers said that the commitment of $140 million dollars puts the program in a strong position to leverage funding from state and federal sources.
Following the presentation, a few locals expressed concerns about the left-hand Cabrillo Boulevard and Sheffield Road exits, which would likely conflict with the HOV lanes. Although the presenters did not have any concrete answers — no decisions had been made concerning precisely where the lanes would begin and end — they did present the possibility of reconfiguring these exits to allow for the HOV lanes. Other attendees were concerned with how the aesthetic quality of the 101 may be compromised with reduced vegetation or even just a single concrete divider. According to some attendees the divider would be “unsafe and unattractive,” and one resident argued that it would reduce visibility at night due to oncoming headlight glare. This problem was left unresolved.
The project is not expected to require the acquisition of any private property, as construction is anticipated to remain inside the right-of-way the 101 already inhabits. According to Caltrans representative Larry Newland, attendees at the Tuesday, July 7 meeting in Carpinteria expressed concerns that the project would encourage Santa Barbara workers to commute, allowing them “to get a bigger house farther away from Santa Barbara.” Although this may be true, Newland said, the project addresses the issues of a statewide highway—with its freight-haulers, long-distance travelers, and service vehicles — as well as those of a local highway.
Caltrans is encouraging the community to respond with comments and concerns. Mail letters to Matt Fowler, Environmental Analysis Chief, Caltrans, 50 Higuera Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401, or email to matt_c_fowler@dot.ca.gov. For more information, visit the 101 In Motion Web site or contact Project Manager Scott Eades of Caltrans at (805) 549-3144.
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
Previous Month


Comments
Discussion Guidelines
The title could be "CaRTrans, The BIGGEST Developer In The State Gets AN Environmentalist Pass!"
HOV lanes! What an ordinary Las Angeleees thing to do. The Independent could, between the entertainment advertisements, resurrect that old rendering of the proposed 101 concrete channel as a front page visual. Trees will be planted to soften the concrete channel's hardscape, eliminating the few firebreaks left, but think of the public and private views lost. Where's the Save El Pueblo Viejo crowd now. I guess driving around looking at all those tall buildings.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 1 of 1
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
July 10, 2009 at 6:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Thanks Don. How enlightening. I'm not sure where to begin debunking your baseless statements. Caltrans would in no way receive and environmental pass on the project. This is both a federal and state route, so an Environment Impact Statement and Report (EIS and EIR to satisfy NEPA and CEQA respectively) would need to be prepared. Not only that, but the Coastal Commission, Fish and Game, and Army Corps would come into play due to widening over the creek. But I digress. Perhaps the question you should be asking is, if I wanted views, why did I buy a house next to a freeway. And if you have any other suggestions for alternative routes, I would love to hear it. Would you should be applauding is the fact that no additional land would be required, so that those homes whose views you expect to be compromised are not taken under emminent domain. Also, they are part time HOV lanes similar to those in the bay area that operate during certain times of the day, not the completely restricted kind found in LA County. Ignorance is bliss, I suppose.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
sbdude (anonymous profile)
July 10, 2009 at 10:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)
As a life long resident what gets me is that this has been an on going deal for 20 plus years. Now it will cost a state strapped for cash close to a billion dollars. When we could of done it for far far less back then and still not have the traffic issues we do now.
But in typical SB fashion we squabble of a tree a view or headlights coming into our view. Geez folks people everywhere deal with these little issues. I would guess that the folks that have for ever in Montecito have been pushing hard against these projects are probably for them now days with traffic, noise, smog, fumes and there roads being jammed with people doing cut thoroughs to miss the stop and go.
As for a 16 million dollar bridge tear the thing out if needed progress is needed. All these public transo po ideas are great be will not be overly used. Buses are gross and so badly up kept. The trains might work if you had depot's that where in good area's. Going to need several of these along the tracks.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
Thisislame (anonymous profile)
July 12, 2009 at 1:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)
No matter how much people argue, development and the widening of freeways will steamroll over any "slow growth" ideas as long as the population keeps growing.
There is no end in sight to how much development will happen in Santa Barbara.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
billclausen (anonymous profile)
July 13, 2009 at 3 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Post a comment