One week after jurors found Jesse James Hollywood guilty of first degree murder, they deliberated again, this time to decide between sentencing him with life imprisonment without the possibility of parole or the death penalty. On Wednesday, after approximately three hours of deliberation spread over two days, the jury recommended the life imprisonment sentence. They sat calmly as the verdict was announced, and Judge Brian Hill, after thanking the jurors for the service, cleared the courthouse within a few minutes.
After the court clerk read the verdict before a quiet and relatively empty court room - family members and the press were present, but very few people from the general public attended - defense co-counsel Alex Kessel turned his head toward the jury and said, “Thank you.” Outside the courthouse, however, Kessel and lead defense attorney James Blatt shared their misgivings about the jury. They plan to make a motion for a mistrial on October 21, at the formal sentencing hearing.
“It is not over,” Blatt said. “We are confident that things will turn around.” But lead prosecutor Joshua Lynn celebrated the original guilty verdict. Lynn had been pushing for the death penalty, but he said he trusted the jury’s decision and was relieved that the trial was complete. “I hope it’s over. I think it’s over. It ought to be over,” Lynn said.
For the first time since the trial began, Hill lifted his gag order, finally allowing the families and attorneys to speak with the press. The defense lawyers took that opportunity to assert their client’s innocence. They blamed the jury, the court instructions, and the media for the guilty verdict. “Some of the jurors are deeply troubled about something that happened in this trial. We’re going to find out what that is,” Blatt told reporters. Blatt said that, during the guilt phase of the trial, one of the jurors had made a joke about Hollywood receiving the electric chair. After the jury convicted Hollywood of first degree murder, a juror’s husband approached the defendant’s father, Jack Hollywood. The attorneys discussed the incident on Tuesday, and Hill ruled that the joke did not indicate that the juror was prejudicial. In front of the press, however, Blatt and Kessel continued to argue for a new trial. “Her husband was so concerned that he approached Mr. Hollywood,” Blatt said, going on to explain that the juror may have been bullied into agreeing on a guilty verdict.
After the sentencing verdict was read on Wednesday, Hill invited the jurors to talk with the attorneys from either side, an invitation that all the jurors declined. Blatt and Kessel said they found the jury’s silence to be suspicious. Blatt also said he found the jury instructions to be potentially confusing, particularly an instruction that Hill had made about a felony-murder ruling.
Blatt and Kessel also blamed the media for the verdict, particularly Alpha Dog, a 2006 feature film based on this case.
“This is the first time in the history of our country, where a movie is made about a criminal act prior to the trial,” Blatt said. Ron Zonen, the original prosecutor who was eventually taken off the Hollywood case, consulted with the director of Alpha Dog, so the film was based solely on the prosecution’s theory, Kessel argued. “Sometimes the power of the media, the power of the movie, can be very subtle and great,” Blatt said.
Prosecutor Joshua Lynn was more reserved around the press, choosing instead to thank the Markowitz family, the jury, and his co-counsel Hans Almgren. He did not go into his trial strategy, or his risky decision to not call Hollywood associate Jesse Rugge to testify, something that the defense harped on in their closing arguments. Lynn said that the decision was a “tactical issue.” “I’m not going to elaborate on that any further,” he said.
The parents of the victim, Nicholas Markowitz, have had nine years to grieve since their son was shot by Ryan Hoyt in the foothills of Santa Barbara in August 2000. They appeared to be relaxed and grateful in front of the press, with the mother Susan Markowitz showing off a pin on her jacket that holds a picture of her late son. “There are an awful lot of families out there who haven’t had the success we had,” said Jeffery Markowitz, the victim’s father, with his arm around his wife. “Some of the media attention was a little biased we felt, at times,” he said, but he also thanked the media for their attention and support. “We’ve had some compassion from the Hollywood family,” he said. “They’ve probably all had something nice to say to us.”
“Not me,” retorted Susan, who said she has never had any communication with them. But her husband excused the Hollywoods, saying that it is more intimidating to talk to the mother of the victim than the father.
Hollywood was not present at the shooting in August 2000, that killed Markowitz, but he essentially admitted to kidnapping the boy and bringing him from Los Angeles to Santa Barbara. The jury found him guilty of ordering another associate, Ryan Hoyt, to commit the murder. (Hoyt was convicted of the crime and is now on death row.) The Markowitz family nonetheless expressed some sympathy for the man convicted of masterminding their son’s kidnapping and murder. “As a mother, I would not be thrilled or relieved that [Jesse James Hollywood] received the death penalty,” Susan Markowitz said. Susan Markowitz said that she finally received some degree of closure in 2005, after Hollywood was captured after having eluded authorities in Brazil. During this time, Hollywood impregnated his girlfriend. The prosecution claimed he did this to avoid being extradited from the country.
Blatt said that Hollywood misses his family. “She has been unable to get a visa to come to this country,” Blatt said, referring to the mother of Hollywood’s child.
Hollywood’s parents avoided the crowd of reporters gathered in front of the courthouse. Jack Hollywood talked to a few reporters individually, but hid inside Blatt’s office when a larger crowd approached.
Related Links
Amy Silverstein is an Independent intern.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Defense Team - Give it up already !!
Consider yourself very lucky your client only received "Life-Without-Parole" for being the Mastermind of a brutal "Murder-For-Hire" who the Jury had found ordered the killing of a 15-Year-Old schoolboy.
Don't get greedy !!
.
DEATH_PENALTY (anonymous profile)
July 16, 2009 at 8:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)
TomKuhn (anonymous profile)
July 16, 2009 at 9:14 p.m.
What ever happened to the "Land Of The Free?
"The United States has the highest documented incarceration rate, and total documented prison population in the world. As of year-end 2007, a record 7.2 million people were behind bars, on probation or on parole. Of the total, 2.3 million were incarcerated. More than 1 in 100 American adults were incarcerated at the start of 2008. The People's Republic of China ranks second with 1.5 million, while having four times the population, thus having only about 18% of the US incarceration rate."
We also have the highest murder rate in the world.....This new American Justice system (post 1978) is really working out well, wouldn't you say?
TomKuhn (anonymous profile)
July 16, 2009 at 9:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Tom, what the hell does your statistical information have to do with this particular case?
SezMe (anonymous profile)
July 17, 2009 at 12:51 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I think it is silly to make the Hollywood character seem larger than life. He seems to be a small time hood. But I tend to believe juries so I would agree with them that he ordered the murder.
Cappysgoat (anonymous profile)
July 17, 2009 at 3:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Mr Hollywood is innocent of murder in this case & he got "railroaded"...The FACT is that there is not proof that he ordered or paid anyone to commit this murder or that he had the power to control the 3 people who were present during the execution. ANY time before Nick was killed, any of the 3 principlals could have stopped this crime. Rugge could have walked out of the LemonTree and called Jeff Markowitz to come and pick Nick up while Hoyt & Pressley were digging Nicks grave with his shovels. Pressley could have opened the door to the car when Hoyt went in to retrieve Nick (Pressley clearly stated that Hoyt left the gun in the trunk) walked around the corner & called 911. Knowing what he knew, Pressley could have given police info that would have saved Nicks life. Hoyt could have come to his senses & not shot Nick & took him home instead. The evidence points to the FACT that all three of these guys were involved in a premeditated murder. The SBDAs office knew this from the beginning. They vehemently prosecuted both Rugge & Pressley for 1st degree murder. They lost one on aquittal, Rugge & the other Pressley manipulated the system to get himself out in 6 years. Both of their BS stories (BS if you believe the SBDAs office) were that they were so terrified of the omnipotent, Mansonesque, Alpha Dog, King of Thugs, that they had no choice in their actions. In this trial the DA trots out Pressley and uses this slick, lying little weasel to hang the murder on Jesse. Could another reasonable assumption be that Rugge, afraid of being charged with kidnapping co-opted Hoyt to Kill Nick? It makes a hell of a lot more sense than the crap that Pressley & Rugge are selling. Is it legal for a DAs office to argue out both sides of their mouth in the same case depending on who they are trying to hang at the moment? If it is it certainly shouldn't be. The weak evidence presented in this case regarding Hollywood ordering Hoyt to kill Nick is laughable. Hoyt bought a couple hundred dollars worth of clothes the day before his birthday party. Sheehan said he assumed that it might have been money given to him by his mother, or grandmother for his birthday. The film from February of 2000 indicated that Hoyt owed Jesse $1200 at THAT time. If Hoyt was working off his debt by helping Jesse around the house (as was confirmed by several witnesses) since February, at the rate of 50 a day five days a month, the debt as Jesse clearly stated was all but paid off. Generally in cases charging murder for hire there is clear evidence of a large sum of money being exchanged....THE JURY GOT IT WRONG!! And the "Chief Deputy" DA proved what a sleazy politician he is. Obviously this guy will do anything to get his shot at the head job in the office....Hopefully this rotten verdict will be overturned & Mr Hollywood will get a change of venue to somewhere he can get a fair trial.
TomKuhn (anonymous profile)
July 17, 2009 at 10:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)
i have thought about this alot , and i would give alot
to know if hollywood actually ordered the boy killed , if it was just a case of three stooges , which it seems to have been , not many geniuses on board here , and hollywood
was really just being a dick and trying to scare ben , then it is a shame , cuz it did lead to the death of nicholas , but too , IF he did not order the kid killed , then maybe he is not the monster i have made him to be in my mind ,
it is just impossible to know , there are so many grey areas , he said she said , etc .
like my mom said , " be careful what you start .."
if they do retrial , then rugge and hoyt , or at least
one , HAS to be called ....
harryhaller (anonymous profile)
July 17, 2009 at 10:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The Defense had every opportunity to call RUGGE and/or HOYT to the witness-stand themselves when they put on their side of the case.
Just as they chose to put Hollywood on the witness-stand....
They also "CHOSE" to not put Rugge & Hoyt on the witness-stand for their own tactical & strategic reasons..... whatever they were.
So the DA does not "Have To" put anyone on the witness-stand if they do not want too. The Defense is just as capable of putting someone on the witness-stand as the DA.
.
DEATH_PENALTY (anonymous profile)
July 17, 2009 at 12:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)
hell no jesse james hollywood got exactly what he deserves. What goes around comes around and he can rot in jail. What kind of p*ssy kidnaps a little kid because your too scared to confront someone your own size. LOL yeah he was a real alpha dog, he was the biggest wigga wannab thought he was so cool and tough he makes me laugh. The fact that he kidnapped the boy at all is proof he did it over something Ben owed him, all those other boys had absolutely no connection to this kid there is no way one of them would have thought to murder him please, they kidnapped him WITH jesse FOR jesse. And people have stated that the whole "witnessed" argument where Jesse was supposedly yelling at Hoyt saying he "screwed up" or "why didn't you do what I said" puts doubt in their minds of Jesse's wrong doing?? PLease he ws probably yelling at him because if one was trying to get away with a murder than what happened was as if they wanted to get caught. He was yelling at Hoyt for leaving the gun and having eye witnesses it could have been anything. And I do not care what cops are saying or the media, any innocent person on this earth would not run they would go to somebody immediately and they would try anything to have the truth known. Jesse is right where he belongs, no parole, peace out you bone thug in harmony, alpha dog, ghetto,hood hoppin, soldier boy. I hope you can be alpha dog with all the big lovely men in prison sucka.
mcurtin (anonymous profile)
July 17, 2009 at 12:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Death_Penalty
You said:"The Defense had every opportunity to call RUGGE and/or HOYT to the witness-stand themselves when they put on their side of the case."
What you declined to mention is the FACT that Rugge entered into an agreement with the SBDAs office in January of this year. The agreement was that if Rugge changed his story a little bit to implicate JJH they would give him a favorable recommendation in his next parole hearing. I wouldn't be surprised if the Markowitz family would stop their efforts to block his parole would be thrown in also, much like in Pressleys case. The defense has NO such power & you know it. To infer that the defense is in the same position as the prosecution as far as calling Rugge in is a bunch of crap....You seem like another sleazy hack prosecutor trying to sell those on this thread the same bill of goods that Lynn sold the jury...Is that you Hans???
TomKuhn (anonymous profile)
July 17, 2009 at 3:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Death-Penalty said:
"Bottom Line is: Jesse James Hollywood is going to State Prison for the rest of his life & never be paroled."
The bottom line is this.....JJH was found not guilty of aggravated kidnapping, and is not eligible for the death pentalty ever again. When he is granted a new trial he will be therefore entitled to a jury with an above room temp IQ. (non-killers will not be excluded)
With the sleazy tactics used by the SBDAs office & the alleged jury misconduct (that has been temporarily swept under the rug by some fast talking by Judge Brian Hill, a former collegue of Lynn, Almgren & Zonen, in the SBDAs office) there's an excellent chance that this travesty of justice will be overturned down the 101 in Ventura sometime within the next two years....It ain't over yet sporto!!
TomKuhn (anonymous profile)
July 17, 2009 at 3:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Dream on, Kuhn, and while you are at it, try to gather your thoughts rather than foaming at the mouth in repeated multiple postings between which no one else has said anything.
Justice (anonymous profile)
July 17, 2009 at 4:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I personally can not believe the level of stupidity throughout this entire trial. They say "innocent until proven guilty" and judging by what I have heard there is no way Jesse James Hollywood is guilty of murder. Up until I read about the trial I thought Jesse was one hundred percent guilty, this was because of the media, the movie Alpha Dog. Having said that I have to disagree with my original opinion; based on the trial and the hard evidence there is no way Jesse James Hollywood should be considered guilty. The guilty verdict is stemmed from the media. Jesse is obviously guilty of the kidnapping, he even claimed that himself, but how can he be guilty for a murder he was not even present for?
I myself have known some people who deal drugs. It's incredible how intelligent many of them are. My point is drug dealers are often very smart people, which Jesse James Hollywood obviously was considering what he had made for himself by the age of 20. People who have to worry about the law often know much about the law. They know their rights, they know what they can and can not get themselves in trouble for, and they know what crimes are worse then others. I just can't see a young man with this much intelligence being so stupid to think that murdering someone is better then kidnapping him; plus Nick Markowitz was free to go at any time. No criminal with the intent to murder someone would let their victim run around free. Ryan Hoyt murdered Nick Markowitz not Jesse.
Canada (anonymous profile)
July 20, 2009 at 12:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The one thing I don't understand the most is that there is a lot of people sitting there and saying these horrible things about Jesse, that he is some psychopath and a cold blooded murderer. Are you any better? You're all sitting there wishing for this man to have the DEATH PENALTY. You yourself are sitting there WISHING for someone else to die. You yourself are just as inhuman as the person who did murder Nick. It disgusts me to see people who think they are so above Jesse James Hollywood when you are doing worse then him. The person who murdered Nick has been sentenced. Why are you asking for more? Ryan Hoyt murdered Nick, regardless of whether or not Jesse James ordered the murder it was Ryan who followed through with it. He could have said no he could have walked away, but he didn't and for that he is on DEATH ROW. All of you people are crazy. As much as a sympathize the Markowitz family I can not believe they are in favor of killing someone else's son. You are taking away someone else's son they way your son was taken from you. You have caught your killer and should feel at peace with that. I feel for your family and friends, I really do. Loosing somebody you love is one of the hardest things anybody could ever be put through and I send my love and support to the tragedy you have been put through.
Until Jesse James Hollywood is proven Guilty, I consider him innocent of murder. Your verdict disgusts me. I don't agree with the Death Penalty whatsoever, it's already disgusting enough that you idiots have one person there, why waste more lives, haven't enough people suffered enough from this. Killing is not the answer. You all disgust me.
R.I.P Nickolas Markowitz
I wish the Markowitz's the best in life and I sympathize the tragedies you have suffered, nobody should ever have to experience something like that in their life time
Canada (anonymous profile)
July 20, 2009 at 12:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Joshua Lynn, who had been pushing hard for the death penalty said:
"I hope it's over. I think it's over. It ought to be over"
.......Mommy, please make them say it's over!!!
What a stud......LOL....Look out Vince Bugliosi...
Fradulant_Justice (anonymous profile)
July 20, 2009 at 1:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Look out Merriam-Webster!
Fraudulent is spelled with an "E!"
binky (anonymous profile)
July 20, 2009 at 6:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Fra -u- dulent is also spelled with an "U"
You've just bungled your Screenname all over the place.
Spell-Check your Screenname before you go mocking someone!
.
DEATH_PENALTY (anonymous profile)
July 24, 2009 at 6:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Tom-Kuhn -
Your postings are nothing less than babbling rants!
While your other postings are nothing short of sheer propaganda!
When a persons' postings are removed/ deleted by the blogs' Adminstrators = It clearly shows that person's level of education.
.
DEATH_PENALTY (anonymous profile)
July 24, 2009 at 7:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Death penalty, isn't doesn't take any eduacation to display such discusting behavior and hatred as you have.This goes the same for all of your friends out there in hateville, harryhaller ducky80, theguywritingthis, pspa157,bahamama,Justice,faerydragon,and the rest of you. Put a little love in your hearts. Love is the answer. Bottom line is that the proscecution didn't PROVE anything at all that links Jesse Hollywood to Nick's Murder. Not one thing. No money exchange, no order, no past history of violence, not one shred of evidence. I know first hand that at least half of the jury was biased to begin with. The ones who were able to see the truth and see that there was clearly no evidence that gave proof of Jesse ordering Nick to be murdered were badgered and worn down by the others on the jury. Not to mention, they were not given clear instructions by Judge Brian Hill. I can't help but wonder if they have trouble sleeping at night. Still, I don't judge them, but rather pray for them that they find courage and don't let their fear hold them back from doing something about it. The "honorable" Brian Hill showed no signs of having any balls under that robe of his. He has the power to do the right thing but as of yet has used his power for evil instead of good. He has not allowed justice to be served. He didn't do anything to stand for TRUTH. So whatever your education is, which you seem so arrogant about, you still can't tell right from wrong, proof from reasonable doubt. Jesse is paying the price for a crime he didn't commit. You can thank the jurors who had it in for him and the others with the lack of courage to stand up for the truth. He[Jesse] has been paying the price for many years now with his very life, on the run or in the SBC Jail. This has been a tragic injustice from the beginning for Jesse Hollywood. It started with a BIG LIE from the SB Police, and Prosecution, (and you can be sure that Ben Markowitz had his hand in this load of crap story) which then went to the media in the attemp to "get Jesse Hollywood" It's a damn shame.
glwilliams (anonymous profile)
July 26, 2009 at 2:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Thanks for your comments Canada and Albert. Sounds like you know a railroad job when you see it.
glwilliams (anonymous profile)
July 26, 2009 at 8:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)
glwilliams
I appreciate you taking the time to read what I had to say. I am more then happy to support innocence.
The jurors should be ashamed. If it wasn't for easily corrupted minds, this trial may have ended much different. I don't have much tolerance for idiocy and this trial reaks of just that.
From what I have read a majority of people have not taken the time to sit down and actually pay attention to what the facts are. Based on the hard facts the verdict was incorrect. Simple as that.
I also find it kind of funny how the people who seem to have paid attention to fact, are the people who are not personally bashing other people, their opinions, and their education.
Canada (anonymous profile)
July 28, 2009 at 9:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)
GLWilliams says:
"isn't doesn't take any eduacation to display such...."
Still using double-negatives in a sentence = "Isn't doesn't..."
Hahaa, classic !!
L O L - I'm still laughing at your posting.
Then you misspelled the word education = For example, "eduacation" . . . . . LoL
That's just in the 1st-sentence too.
Your posting is riddled with misspellings & grammatical errors all throughout it.
.
DEATH_PENALTY (anonymous profile)
July 31, 2009 at 4:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)
hey glwilliams i dont want you to think im in hateville or whatever you called it i do think hollywood got railroaded in this trial and i do hopehe gets a new trial but if not i hope the judge also knows jjh got a raw deal and gives him a lesser sentence than what the jury asked for....
ducky80 (anonymous profile)
July 31, 2009 at 7 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The judge cannot reduce the sentence.
The sentence is mandatory = Life Without Parole !!
Reason: "Special Circumstances" were found to be "true."
Once you're convicted of a "Special Circumstance" the judge is obligated to sentence you to either:
~ Death;
~ Life Without Parole;
.
DEATH_PENALTY (anonymous profile)
July 31, 2009 at 9:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
TomKuhn (anonymous profile)
July 31, 2009 at 10:27 p.m.
Dear Death Penalty, You seem to be overly concerned with grammar and spelling. Sounds like a personal problem. Maybe some feelings of inadequacies in other areas. I think that it was fairly obvious that "isn't doesn't" was just a simple mistake. I didn't have an editor on hand. What I meant to write (although obvious to most readers) was " It doesn't take any education to display such hatred......." So perhaps you could over look the grammar and spelling which by the way you seem to be so proud of your abilities in finding fault in mine, and JUST TRY TO GET THE POINT of what is being said . (Oh my goodness, was that a run on sentence?) Love to all. xo
glwilliams (anonymous profile)
August 3, 2009 at 2:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Thank you ducky80. I'm sorry if I lumped you in with the group of haters. If that is not your stand I appreciate your support for truth, justice for Jesse. So thanks again. Love to all. xo
glwilliams (anonymous profile)
August 3, 2009 at 3:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Canada (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2009 at 10:34 a.m.
It's absolutely ridiculous that all you can do is comment on grammar and education. Who cares if things are said wrong or spelt wrong? The only reason people are even able to hear your opinion is because you comment on here as well. It's great that you want to be correct in how you spell and how you construct your sentences; however, it's very foolish of you to comment on the fact that other people don't. People are writing on this to get their opinions heard much like yourself. Bashing their spelling and grammar ability is ridiculous.
Please do everyone a favour and try to be respectful of what other people have to say.
Canada (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2009 at 10:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Thanks again Canada. It's clear that you understand the seriousness of the situation and know that grammar and spelling are of little importance in the grand scale of life's issues. It's the heart of the issue that is important. Thanks again. Love to all xo
glwilliams (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2009 at 12:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)
GLWILLIAMS.....do you happen to have old files of the Rugge and Hoyt Trials ???? I am curious in Rugge case as to why I have read that he perjured himself in order to escape the murder charge. But for all us JJH supporters, there is a good chance for a mistrial as one juror, while deliberating admitted to having a gun license, but during jury questioning denied it.
kerry121 (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2009 at 1:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)
This is a serious issue and this foolishness is unnecessary. I really do understand that everyone has their opinions. I personally am very open to hearing other opinions, but I can no longer sit here and read this childish banter. All I can say is I'm lucky I happen to have people like yourself, glwilliams, who are not posting on here just to make asinine comments whenever they get the opportunity.
Canada (anonymous profile)
August 5, 2009 at 2:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Good chance of mistrial? Based on what? You'll get better odds in the California Lottery. JJH supporters need a new horse, cause the one you are riding is way lame!
osotoh (anonymous profile)
August 7, 2009 at 10:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)