• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    Paul Wellman

    THE ACCUSED: Jesse James Hollywood is brought into court each morning under tight security behind shielded fences and walls.


    Jesse James Hollywood Tells His Story

    Alleged Mastermind of the Kidnapping and Murder of 15-Year-Old Nicholas Markowitz Takes the Stand


    Monday, June 22, 2009
    By Chris Meagher (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    After years of having other people — from police and prosecutors to moviemakers, journalists, friends, and enemies — tell his story, Jesse James Hollywood took the witness stand on Monday afternoon to finally give his own account of the events surrounding the taking of 15-year-old Nicholas Markowitz on August 6, 2000, and his cold-blooded murder just days later.

    While authorities allege Hollywood kidnapped and later ordered the murder of the teenager due to a $1,200 drug debt owed by Markowitz’s older half-brother, Hollywood’s attorneys have been working to distance their client from his involvement. It is widely accepted that Hollywood was not present when his close friend Ryan Hoyt fired the weapon that killed Markowitz the night of August 8 at Lizard’s Mouth, a popular hiking spot in the mountains overlooking Santa Barbara, but most other details — including whether Hollywood ordered the killing or wanted the boy taken home — remain open for courtroom debate.

    Wearing a black suit with a striped tie over a white shirt, the small-statured Hollywood was the last witness to take the stand on Monday, June 22. He spoke clearly and confidently into the microphone, answering many of his attorney James Blatt’s questions politely with “No, sir,” and “Yes, sir.”

    By day’s end, Hollywood was yet to get into the details of what happened in August 2000; instead, through questioning by Blatt, he walked the jury through periods of time leading up to the events of August 2000. He told the jury he started to sell small amounts of marijuana when his family lived in Colorado, but wasn’t aware at the time his father also sold marijuana. “Growing up I always had an idea my dad was involved in illicit activities,” Hollywood said, but he said he never saw evidence of his father’s involvement. Later in life, he said, he learned his father was involved in selling low to mid-grade marijuana in a very high volume — more than 100 pounds at a time.

    In high school, Hollywood said baseball was his life until he injured his shoulder and back his junior year of high school. “I was never really the same,” he said. Around that time, he said, he was selling marijuana, often by the ounce, sometimes up to two pounds at a time.

    He bought a home when he was 18 years old, putting down approximately $20,000 — $15,000 he received through insurance from an accident, and $5,000 in savings from marijuana sales. He later “moved up kind of,” and began selling more marijuana — between five and seven pounds a month. He would break it down himself or give certain friends marijuana to sell on consignment, meaning they would take the drugs and sell them, paying Hollywood back as they made the money. Compared to his dad’s drug activity, Hollywood said, his market was “more what I created in the [San Fernando] Valley at that time,” which featured a higher grade pot. His father, meanwhile, sold marijuana as far away as New York, Hollywood said. At his highest point, Hollywood testified that he was making about $10,000 per month from marijuana sales, while also bringing in $1,000 more per month installing hardwood floors.

    His friends were mostly from baseball, he said, and included previous witness Casey Sheehan (whose car was used by Hoyt to transport Markowitz to Lizard’s Mouth) and Hoyt. Hollywood described Hoyt as a “very close” friend who would go on vacations with his family and would take his little brother to baseball practice. “My parent’s home was like a second home for him,” Hollywood said.

    Hoyt built up a debt, Hollywood said, after Hollywood bought Hoyt a cheap car for his birthday. Hoyt never registered the car in his own name, instead racking up almost $1,000 in parking tickets, which Hollywood said he had to pay himself. He also had given him a half-pound of marijuana and Hoyt “ended up blowing that as well.” Hoyt was paying off the debt by helping renovate Hollywood’s new house, putting in a new fence, new grass, and sanding down a Jacuzzi. By August 2000, his debt was down to “$100, maybe $200,” Hollywood said. “He had been working for months.”

    Hoyt is one of four others to have been sentenced in connection with the crime. Hoyt, the convicted shooter, is on death row at San Quentin Prison.

    With his parents sitting on one side of the courtroom, and Markowitz’s parents on the other, Hollywood was on the stand for about 30 minutes. He had yet to talk about the kidnapping and murder, though he did briefly mention a falling out with Ben Markowitz. If he is found guilty, Hollywood could face the death penalty. Under the constitution, a defendant has a right not to take the stand, and the wide majority of defendants do not.

    In his opening statement, prosecutor Joshua Lynn called Hollywood a “ruthless coward” and portrayed the now-29-year-old as a well-known drug dealer in the San Fernando Valley “trying to live up to the reputation he was building.” Hollywood himself said he was a health nut who worked out everyday, was always watching what he ate, and didn’t party too frequently. “Business always came first,” he said.

    Hollywood is expected to take the stand once again Tuesday morning at 9 a.m. in Department 14.

    Related Links

    • Complete Hollywood Trial Coverage
    Story Help (Click-ability)
    Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    It's finally time to hear the truth. It's about time that Jesse Hollywood can speak about what really happened on the days leading up to Nick Markowitz' tragic death. His story has not changed or expanded as the time has passed. That can't be said of the testimony of so many of the others who have testified against him. The truth remains the same and doesn't change. Jesse's story has remained steadfast to what he has testified to in court yesterday as well as today's testimony. It is the same story that he had told the close friend with whom he sought refuge and spent time with immediately after the death of Nick, just prior to his decision to flee. His family knew. Every detail has remained the same from the beginning to the end. We have always known the truth about Jesse. How ever this ends up, we are thankful that he has finally had a chance to tell it as it was.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 5 • Thumbs Down: 4 of 5

    glwilliams (anonymous profile)
    June 23, 2009 at 6:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Get real.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 2 of 2 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 2

    cartoonz (anonymous profile)
    June 24, 2009 at 12:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    glwilliams - what planet are you living on? You seem to believe this monster was denied the chance to tell his "story" until now. Did you miss the news - Hollywood fled the country and was a fugitive, hiding out in Brazil and elsewhere for many, many years before he was captured and brought back to stand trial for these crimes. In the intervening years, his co-conspirators were all tried and convicted, giving Hollywood the opportunity to learn what they said and get his story straight. The truth is about the last thing I expect to hear from this murderer.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 2 • Thumbs Down: 1 of 2

    Justice (anonymous profile)
    June 24, 2009 at 7:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    The District Attorney's prosecution of Hollywood has been flawed. They haven't produced any evidence to prove Hollywood ordered anyone to kill Markowitz. I'm surprised that the defense called any witnesses. By putting Hollywood on the stand the defense risks a tough cross examination by the District Attorney. Maybe the defense knows that the District Attorney's office is so incompetent that any cross examination won't damage Hollywood. Hollywood will likely be convicted of kidnapping but I doubt he'll be convicted of murder.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 2 of 2 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 2

    buckwheat (anonymous profile)
    June 24, 2009 at 8:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    As for the argument between Hoyt and Hollywood and the screw up, although the defense is implying that the screw up was the murder, I think the prosecution should show that the argument was more likely about Hoyt leaving a traceable gun in the grave. Also, the prosecution needs to disprove the allegation that Hollywood left the gun at the garage Hoyt used and never saw it again.
    One of the most interesting things for me was not mentioned at all in any of the news accounts. Hollywood TWICE referred to the dispute with Hollywood as like "Cape Fear" (with Robert DeNiro).
    "The guy owes ME money and he's coming after ME, is pretty much what Hollywood said.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1

    babazaba (anonymous profile)
    June 24, 2009 at 8:55 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    The aim of the US justice system is to provide "Equal Justice For All Under The Law".

    Graham Pressley is out after serving less than 6 years when he could have, by his own account walked a half a block and made an annonymous phone call to stop this carnage before Hoyt & Rugge led Nick up to the killing ground. Instead he decided to tag along to lead the way to the gravesite. After agressively prosecuting Pressley twice for murder, convicting him the second time, the same office now would have you believe that his 5th version of the events is reliable.

    Jesse Rugge testified that he waited with Nick for over an hour at the Lemon Tree, while Pressley & Hoyt went to dig the grave with shovels from Rugge's parents yard. He could have easily taken Nick away from the scene and called Susan and Jeff Markowitz or the police. Rugge, (who has been eligible for parole for the last three years) earlier this year entered into an agreement with the DAs office to testify against Hollywood in exchange for a favorable recommendation at his parole next hearing, which was delayed until after the trial. Of course he, like most of the prosecution witnesses would have to switch his story to implicate Hollywood & contradict his earlier statements for the latest prosecution theory, and admit that he perjured himself then, but now is telling the truth. He's on the prosecution witness list. Let's see if they call him, & if not why. Could it be that they have already reached their limit of admitted perjurors for one trial? What is it 8.....9....???

    The prosecution's case has been advanced by a virtual parade of admitted perjurors & immunized witnesses who are obviously covering their own butts along with their friends, while pointing the blame at the ruthless and all powerful "Alpha Dog" fictional character that was created by Nick Cassavettes and Lions Gate pictures with plenty of help from the Santa Barbara DAs office...

    Justice at last.....Santa Barbara style..

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    TomKuhn (anonymous profile)
    June 25, 2009 at 11:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    @TomKuhn:

    How do you know Rugge has entered into an agreement with the DA's Office with regards to Rugge testifying in Hollywood's trial & the DA then writing a favorable letter to the parole board for his next parole hearing ??

    Also... since the DA never called Rugge, does Rugge still get the favorable parole letter ??

    .

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    DEATH_PENALTY (anonymous profile)
    July 7, 2009 at 10:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Clear Sky
    Temperature:
    63.0°
    Wind:
    8 SE

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    • CAMA Presents the Shanghai Symphony
    • Elings Park Expansion Shot Down
    • Before I Be Your Dog …
    • Flobots Return with New Record, New Vision
    • Autism Attacked Alternatively
    1. Eating Animals
    2. Montecito Pet Shop to Sell Only Rescued Dogs
    3. Producer Must Pay Landscaper
    4. Nothing to Hide Anymore
    5. High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    6. Teacher in Trouble
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.