WEATHER »
<strong>Legal Smackdown:</strong>  Mission Terrace Convalescent Hospital (pictured) is looking at more than $2 million in a liability lawsuit payout after a jury sided last week with a patient who was injured severely at the facility in 2007.

Paul Wellman

Legal Smackdown: Mission Terrace Convalescent Hospital (pictured) is looking at more than $2 million in a liability lawsuit payout after a jury sided last week with a patient who was injured severely at the facility in 2007.


Terrace of Trouble?

Jury Awards $2.2 Million in Elder Care Lawsuit


Originally published 12:00 a.m., June 25, 2009
Updated 12:23 p.m., June 26, 2009
Article Tools
Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Share Article

In early 2007, 82-years-young Sylvia Saucedo went to Cottage Hospital with pneumonia. Four days later, after being transferred to Mission Terrace convalescent home for recovery, the longtime Santa Barbara resident was severely brain-damaged and wheelchair-bound for the rest of her life. Though no one knows for certain what happened in the wee hours on January 29 when Saucedo fell on her way to the bathroom, a Santa Barbara jury ruled last week in Judge Thomas Anderle’s courtroom that Mission Terrace, its chief administrator, and its director of nursing are liable for the fateful fall. As a result, the convalescent home must pay Saucedo $2.27 million due to collective negligence and willful misconduct.

The sickness weakened her, but Balisok and cocounsel Jody Moore claim that Mission Terrace failed to properly assess her condition when she was transferred from Cottage.

The fall changed everything,” explained Saucedo’s attorney Russell Balisok in the wake of the jury’s verdict on June 16. His client, now 84, had been living with her son, walking with a cane, and enjoying a generally healthy life prior to her bout with pneumonia. The sickness weakened her, but Balisok and cocounsel Jody Moore claim that Mission Terrace failed to properly assess her condition when she was transferred from Cottage. As a result, she didn’t receive the bathroom assistance, overnight monitoring, low bed, and bed alarm usually enjoyed by weaker patients. They argued in court that the mother of three should not have been going it alone that night on her way to the bathroom and that, rather, Mission Terrace nurses should have been there to help.

The tragic outcome was an unwitnessed fall around 4:30 a.m. on her second night at the facility, resulting in three subdural hematomas, a frontal lobe contusion, diminished speech ability, and 10 months of eating via a feeding tube in her stomach. “And she still hasn’t been able to go home,” said Balisok. While recovering from her fall, Saucedo has been forced to live at the Buena Vista Care Center in Santa Barbara.

While a bulk of the five-week trial centered around Mission Terrace’s failure to properly assess Saucedo’s condition and provide corresponding care, the attorneys also accused the facility of being understaffed on the overnight shift, making false Medicare claims, tampering with Saucedo’s chart, and rewriting-or, in some cases, completely fabricating-certain entries. Though the jury’s ruling doesn’t speak specifically to these allegations-the monies were awarded for future medical care costs, general future damages, and past pain and suffering-Moore and Balisok believe that the jury’s decision to find the defendants guilty of “willful misconduct” suggests that they felt the evidence of purposeful record-tweaking was more than compelling. Furthermore, Moore, who has litigated against Mission Terrace in the past, thinks the chart-tampering she uncovered in the Saucedo case may only be the tip of the iceberg. Saying only that she is still “investigating the business practices of Mission Terrace,” Moore hinted this week that she has found further evidence of Medicare fraud and additional chart falsification.

For their part, Mission Terrace’s attorney Thomas Beach explained that, while he “understood the jury’s sympathy” in awarding compensation, his client takes solace in the fact that Saucedo’s claims of elder abuse were rejected and that Judge Anderle opted to dismiss additional charges of patient rights violations. “We were confident all along that those claims had no merit, whatsoever,” said Beach, before adding that he was “looking forward” to Anderle’s final determination of the amount Mission Terrace will have to pay. As for the allegations of fraud and chart falsification, Beach opined that most of those charges, which fell under the aforementioned umbrella of patient rights violations, were dealt with when Anderle opted to rule against the plaintiff on that matter and thus “rejected those claims in their entirety.”

The matter returns to court on June 25.

UPDATE: A week after a Santa Barbara jury awarded 84-year-old Sylvia Saucedo some $2.2 million dollars stemming from a 2007 fall at Mission Terrace Convalescent home, presiding Judge Thomas Anderle ruled this week in favor of the embattled care center. Saying that there was “no substantial evidence” to establish the jury’s finding of “willful misconduct” by Mission Terrace on that fateful night when Saucedo fell and permanently injured her brain. Anderle on Thursday morning reduced the $1.5 million pain and suffering portion of the overall award to $250,000. As a result, Mission Terrace is now looking at just over $1 million in fines for past and future pain and suffering as well as future medical care costs for Saucedo.

Comments

Independent Discussion Guidelines

doesn't the Independent staff proof read their stories? For example you might have noticed that the first paragraph of this story is repeated verbatim on the second paragraph. Just thought I'd help you guys out.

-- ----- ------ ----- ------

Thanks for the pointing out the duplicated paragraph. We've fixed it.

-- WebAdmin

chuckUfarley (anonymous profile)
June 25, 2009 at 7:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)

(This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of use policy.)

Byrd (anonymous profile)
June 25, 2009 at 1:38 p.m.

And that's the problem no one wants to know what's really happening in those places...Nursing homes the neccessary evil.

Byrd (anonymous profile)
June 25, 2009 at 9:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Moore hits the nail on the head.

"This is just the tip of the iceberg" with problems going on now & in the past at Mission Terrace.

Barron (anonymous profile)
June 26, 2009 at 4:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Mission Terrace is frequently a hell-hole for patients. Some have found it to be a helpful resource, but thousands have been neglected and much worse at Mission Terrace, especially on the overnight shift.
I have a mother who fell and whacked her face (2 black eyes, etc.) her first night there, and I only knew when I showed up around noon the next day. Nurses and other staff "knew nothing" of course, and I was lied to on many levels about the incident.
I know others with much worse experiences...

mangomamma (anonymous profile)
June 29, 2009 at 11:12 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Mission Terrace has had a "sweetheart deal" with Cottage Hospital for several years. Cottage patients who have Medicare and need physical therapy, speech therapy, occupational therapy, or skilled nursing following an acute hospitalization are almost always discharged to Mission Terrace even though there are other skilled nursing facilities that could serve the patient equally well, if not better. If the patient does not recover well enough to return home after the Medicare dollars are exhausted, the patient is welcome to remain at Mission Terrace as a "private pay" patient. Patients who receive Medi-Cal are required to leave Mission Terrace to live in one of the skilled nursing facilities that accept Medi-Cal.

My beef with this is that Cottage would have better served the patient if the patient had been discharged to one of those other facilities where they wouldn't have had to leave if they didn't recover well enough to return home.

buckwheat (anonymous profile)
June 29, 2009 at 12:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)

There are also plenty of cases in which families have had to assertively transfer their loved ones from the Troubled Terrace to another "skilled" nursing facility in order to protect them.

mangomamma (anonymous profile)
July 2, 2009 at 8:14 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I hope Old Anderle ends up there and gets abused to.. He is not a Sane Judge and this Ruling like many others proves it. The fact that he changed the Jury's ruling in favor of evil doers just proves that Judge Anderle is on the take.. Its time we get that man out of office.

thew (anonymous profile)
August 25, 2012 at 11:02 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Mission Terrace is a veritable paradise compared to BUENA VISTA. That the health department hasn't shut them down is a mystery. It's overcrowded - 4+ patients to each 2-patient room is routine. It's understaffed - often 1 CNA for every 12-14 highly dependent/incontinent patients.
If you think the nurses do anything other than hand out medications at these places, you are mistaken.

DemonSeed (anonymous profile)
July 3, 2013 at 3:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)

event calendar sponsored by: