With the full moon rising over the Santa Barbara waterfront on a comfortably cool Friday night, the orange glow and bright flames of the Jesusita Fire could still be seen from Goleta to Montecito, as the fire’s splintered segments sparkled near the ridgeline of Camino Cielo. But unlike the previous two evenings, the sparkle did not morph into a hellish firestorm, force tens of thousands of people to evacuate their neighborhoods, require firefighters to battle flames, or destroy dozens of homes. Rather, the Jesusita, for all its prior rage and destruction, took it easy, and everyone is hoping that the fire’s attitude adjustment will prove permanent.
That’s not to say the fire is out. As of early Saturday morning, May 9, it continues to burn in the mountains above both Montecito and Goleta, and any powerful shift in wind speed or direction could send the blaze back down to town, or over into the Santa Ynez Valley, where there’s plenty to burn. Lots of people spent Friday night fire-watching, a fairly pleasant pastime when there aren’t lives and houses on the line. But thanks to a noticeable drop in temperature, rise in humidity, the moving in of a solid marine layer, and a stillness of the air that hasn’t been felt all week, much of the South Coast was able to sleep a little easier on Friday night.
Of course, there are an estimated 30,000 evacuees from more than 12,000 residences - ranging from the Goleta locals out on Patterson north of 101 to the Montecito people on Hot Springs north of East Valley Road - who caught those zzz’s in a bed other than their own, whether at a friend’s house, in a hotel, or at one of the many Red Cross-run shelters that have opened in response to the fire. The evacuation warnings still also paint a broad brushstroke across the heart of the South Coast, with nearly another 12,000 residences and 30,000 people forewarned that a shift in wind could send them to a shelter too. No doubt all of these folks - who amount to probably a third, if not more, of the population of the entire metropolitan area - are hoping more than anyone that this beast of a blaze comes to a halt sometime soon.
As for the bare facts, as of the last official count (and this will likely change early Saturday morning, at least by the 9 a.m. press conference), the Jesusita Fire has burned 8,600 acres. It is currently 10 percent contained, though that number means very little until it starts breaching the 50 percent mark. An initial assessment counts about 80 residences damaged or destroyed and, of the evacuated homes, about 3,500 are considered “threatened.” Another 100 businesses also have received this threatened status.
Battling the fire as of Friday night were 3,455 personnel, comprised of 428 engines and 78 crews. Air support included 14 air tankers and 15 helicopters, not to mention the big DC-10 that made a midday appearance on Friday and may make a repeat performance on Saturday. There have been 11 firefighters injured, including three Ventura County vets who were transported to a burn center in Sherman Oaks, but they should end up alright. All told, it’s cost $3.2 million to wage the war against the Jesusita, a number that’s sure to climb dramatically.
The cause of the fire, which started along the popular Jesusita hiking trail in San Roque Canyon, remains under investigation. Law enforcement agents have been heard in the field discussing a strong possibility of arson, but there is no official word on that yet. Anyone with information is urged to contact the tip line at (805) 686-5074. Everyone in town will thank you.
Yesterday’s Highlights
Just to make sure readers didn’t miss some of the important reporting filed by The Independent‘s team yesterday, here are some highlights:
Friday Afternoon Press Conference
Friday Night Painted Cave Report
Cruise Ship Cometh
Just as the Jesusita seems to be calming down, another sort of beast will be attacking Santa Barbara from the shoreline. On Sunday, Princess Cruise Lines’ Sapphire Princess pulls into port around 7 a.m. and, so long as the fire’s not bearing down on town, its vacationing boaties will be onshore shopping State Street, going on various tours, and pumping some cash into an economy that’s been sort of frozen for about a week.
Yes, Captain Anthony Herriott is well aware of the fire situation and is prepared to amend the onshore schedule if the Jesusita’s smoke and fire continues to taint our town. They’re leaving it up to Herriott as a “game-day decision.” Unlike the two other Princess Cruise ships that made surprise stops in Santa Barbara on May 2 and 3 due to scrapping Mexico plans amidst the swine flu scare, the Sapphire Princess has intended to make a port call on the American Riviera for several months. That can only mean that the passengers really want to be here, so let’s hope the smoldering and smoke don’t scare ‘em.
What to Expect Today
Assuming the Jesusita doesn’t revert to its monster form, these are the stories you can expect to pop on Independent.com today:
• 9 a.m. press conference update from Chris Meagher
• Morning assessment from Ethan Stewart
• Rundown on yesterday and predictions for today by Ray Ford
• Addition of addresses to our property roll call by Sam Kornell and others
• Afternoon and evening updates, if necessary
Stay tuned, and stay safe.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Thank you to the Indy staff. We had to evacuate and got far out of town. It feels a little helpless to be watching our town we so love burning from so far away. Thanks to the amazing, timely reporting though, we feel like we're able to keep track of things just as well as if we were there and be out of the way for the people who need to be there. You're all just awesome.
onamichin (anonymous profile)
May 9, 2009 at 7:14 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Thanks for the thorough coverage - very appreciated!
I don't think there is anything "fairly pleasant" about watching fire burning through wildlands. Spring is one of the worst times, with wildlfe reproduction in full tilt. I think of all the lives being lost and the damage to the ecosystem which will have repercussions for years to come, while I watch it burn.
There is nothing natural about this kind of fire and we must be more protective than ever over the small areas of "wilderness" we have allowed to exist. Surviving wildlife will now be more likely to be forced to interact with humans, with the high and usually fatal risks that involves. These three fires together are having a devasting impact on our wildlands.
DS (anonymous profile)
May 9, 2009 at 7:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Would love to know as soon as possible about lifting of mandatory evac zones. When will that info be available?
bisonfilms (anonymous profile)
May 9, 2009 at 7:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Does anyone know whether a "dwellings lost" list has been published for Tunnel Road yet? I am specifically interested in 1057 Tunnel Road. Thanks
silkroad (anonymous profile)
May 9, 2009 at 8:18 a.m. (Suggest removal)
DS...I think you misread what was written...or just chose to ignore the last half of that sentence..."Lots of people spent Friday night fire-watching, a fairly pleasant pastime when there aren't lives and houses on the line."
I don't think that the author meant that ANY wildland fire ever falls into that category.
You don't have to be weird, or a pyro to enjoy staring into the flames of a (contained, controlled) fire...like in a fireplace, firepit, or chiminea...while contemplating the meaning of life...maybe even with a nice glass of wine.
That's been a pleasant diversion since before the recorded history of mankind.
jrbiiicpa (anonymous profile)
May 9, 2009 at 8:32 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I think for those who lost their homes in this fire, your insenstive poll suggesting the option that it is "payment for their sins" is a bit over the top don't you think?
DarkMarcsun (anonymous profile)
May 9, 2009 at 8:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Thanks again, Indy, for the awesome fire coverage.
When are you guys going daily?
AndrewRice (anonymous profile)
May 9, 2009 at 8:54 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Thanks AndrewRice. Wattaya call this?
-- WebAdmin
webadmin (webadmin)
May 9, 2009 at 10:02 a.m. (Suggest removal)
They should have kept the fire out when they had it out. Yea we know "the wind", in my opinion they could have put it 'all the way' out.
No one dare criticize the authorities.
They bring in the super tanker after all hell breaks loose, they should hit these fires with everything available (and make it available) when they are first reported.
The authorities do things the way they want to regardless of the results and if one looks at the results of fires in the country, its the same.
Someone ( "stupid citizen" ) reports a fire on a super hot dry area loaded with fuel and the authorities send out an airplane, by then the fire is out of control, or the tea fire and they get a call of fire from local "crazy" lady and they ignore it.
grass (anonymous profile)
May 9, 2009 at 10:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
So good to see the changes today. Changes in evac status just released. The Authorities, who are us ... :) are doing the very best they can in every way and i am very grateful to each and everyone of them. thanks heavens for the change in weather too, and to the "authorities" (divine and otherwise) in charge of that.
CGerlach (anonymous profile)
May 9, 2009 at 11:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Any news about West Camino Cielo. It has been difficult to figure out what is going on with West Camino Cielo as the news often reports Camino Cielo and for those of us up in the mountains, it makes a difference. We have evacuated and would appreciate any news. Thank you Independent!
jeanror (anonymous profile)
May 9, 2009 at 11:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)
grass-
Your comments show a fundamental lack of understanding of how powerless humans really are when facing nature. You do not just "put out" a fire with miles of perimeter, DC-10 or no DC-10. Wednesday and Thursday represented an unfortunate confluence of fuel, heat and wind that made preventing overwhelming loss of life and property a difficult task. The authorities performed very well in this regard.
Frankly, it seems many people do not understand what the DC-10 does. It's used to establish a perimeter where there are long, flat areas that can be coated with phos-check. It also cannot apply phos-check in high winds because they disperse the fire retardant. Basically, in high winds and when the fire is in uneven terrain, a DC-10 is not very effective. Friday appeared to be the day for strategic deployment.
Perhaps there should be some criticism levied due to the Santa Maria Airport not being ready to launch fire fighting aircraft immediately. But otherwise folks are just speculating and lack any basis for criticism, particularly when it comes to strategic choices in deployment. Then again, I suppose some idiot on a message board can coordinate 1000+ outside fire personnel better than the pros!
GaviotaPeak (anonymous profile)
May 9, 2009 at 12:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)
@ grass -
I think you're under the impression that the fixed wing aircraft can stop a fire immediately, and you obviously have no concept of the terrain involved.
The bombers actually put down lines of retardant outside the perimeter of the fire, so when the fire gets to that point, it will be slowed down to allow hand crews in to create a fire break. Whereas the helicopters drop water on the hot spots to avoid potential flareups. The DC-10, or the "super tanker" as you put it, is basically doing the same thing as the C-130s, only covering a greater distance. I hope this clears some things up for you!
On that note, Thank you firefighters!
robert (Robert LeBlanc)
May 9, 2009 at 12:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
What a great job everyone is doing the media KEYT, THE NEWS SUPRESSED, THE INDEPENDANT, AND THE DAILY..THE POLICE, EMTS, AND OF COURSE THE FIREMEN, AND WOMEN..THANK YOU FOR EVERYTHING YOU HAVE DONE..
Byrd (anonymous profile)
May 9, 2009 at 12:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Silkroad
Drove by 1057 Tunnel (left hand side going up house number on mailbox post, house is just back from road) this morning looked fine, lights are on so you have power as well.
pointssouth (anonymous profile)
May 9, 2009 at 12:43 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Whether this is almost game over, or halftime (see next week's weather on weather.com), you have been spectacular. In answer to "What do you call this?" I call it "24/7".
More broadly, and this is for down the line, I suggest that you are exploring the model of the future for print journalism... and doing so in an exemplary fashion that others ought to be watching very closely: Weekly print stories and commentary (and all the other entertainment, travel, dining etc.) and online as need/opportunity present -- 24/7.
In other words, "Watch This Space" for what is likely to survive and thrive in 21st Century journalism.
Or, in a word, "Pulitzer"!!!
FirewindII (anonymous profile)
May 9, 2009 at 4:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Indy WebAdmin, I know you're publishing round the clock on the web while you cover this fire. What I meant by "daily" is when are you taking over that nice Spanish-style building on De La Guerra Plaza and going daily in print?
This crisis coverage shows that the Indy has the ability and gumption to do it, if the business side could work out. And with what Wendy has done to the SBNP there's really not a lot of competition.
Thanks again to all of you.
AndrewRice (anonymous profile)
May 9, 2009 at 5:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)