In a telephone interview Friday, Dan Singer, Goleta’s city manager, confirmed that the city’s preliminary budget plans have not yet been finalized. He did say, however, that the City Council predicts a $1.1 million budget deficit for the 2010 fiscal year, as revenues hover around $14.1 million and expenditures exceed $15 million.
Singer said that though the city is facing fiscal difficulties, council members expect the situation to improve in a few years. He explained that Goleta’s Revenue Neutrality Agreement, which allows for Santa Barbara County to receive a percentage of the city’s taxes, does not significantly exacerbate Goleta’s budget problems. Concerns have been raised by some city residents and elected officials - Councilmember Eric Onnen and many members of the Goleta Valley Chamber of Commerce, among others - that the county was cutting too far into the city’s revenue in a deal they said was flawed from its inception. Prepared in 2002, the agreement was a precondition for the incorporation of Goleta into the county, and though it is not particularly favorable to the city’s fiscal situation, Singer said it represents only a short-term hurdle. “Like any other agreement with the state, we’d like it to eventually sunset and go away,” Singer said, “but we are in a really favorable position even though we have this short-term problem for the next few years. The agreement allows for a big bump at the 10th year of incorporation, so in three more years we’re going to get a significant [increase in revenue].”
The Goleta City Council will meet again Tuesday to discuss budget challenges, revenue neutrality, and how to manage both.
Rachel Reeves is an Independent intern.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Goleta and any other community that depends on property taxes for a big part of it's revenue stream is going to be in for a big shock. Property values won't bottom out for at least two more years or longer. Homes that sold for $700,000 two years ago will eventually be worth less than 1/2 of that, likely 1/3 of that. Re-assessments will be demanded and total property taxes could fall by 20% or more. Sales taxes will also be down for the foreseeable future. The only solution is to downsize government.
gaviotamilitia (anonymous profile)
May 27, 2009 at 8:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)