At about 8:30 p.m. on election night, the results of the City of Santa Barbara’s first mail-in-only election started rolling in. Down at the council hearing room in City Hall, the crowd was standing room only as staffers processed ballots in the front of the room, verifying signatures from the roughly 4,000 ballots turned in today.
Chris Meagher
The scene from City Hall on election night, with everyone awaiting the ballot results at about 8:10 p.m.
In attendance were such dignitaries as current Mayor Marty Blum, former Assemblymember Hannah-Beth Jackson, and former city councilmember Brian Barnwell, as well as mayoral candidate Bob Hansen and City Council candidates David Pritchett, John Thyne, and Cathie McCammon.
Although the final count won’t be for a couple more hours — one city staffer estimates the semi-official results will be known by 11 p.m. — the current tally of all ballots received by yesterday, November 2, has:
● Helene Schneider on top of the mayor’s race with 7,706 votes, followed by Dale Francisco with 6,278 and Steve Cushman’s 2,755 votes, and even further followed by Isaac Garrett at 365 votes and Bob Hansen at 320.
● Measure B, the initiative to lower allowable building heights all over town, was losing, with 8,942 votes against and 8,475 votes for;
● and the race of many for three—but likely four, if sitting councilmembers Schneider or Francisco win the mayor’s race — seats on the Santa Barbara City Council being led by:
- Grant House with 6,702 votes;
- Harwood “Bendy” White at 6,312 votes;
- Michael Self with 5,716 votes;
- Frank Hotchkiss with 5,688 votes;
- Dianne Channing with 4,787 votes;
- David Pritchett with 3,869 votes;
- Cathie McCammon with 2,975 votes;
- John Thyne with 2,570 votes;
- Justin Tevis with 2,020 votes;
- John Gibbs at 1,492 votes;
- Cruzito Cruz with 1,400 votes;
- Lane Anderson with 933 votes;
- and Bonnie Raisin with 638 votes.
● also on the ballot were three more initiatives:
- Measure C, which seeks to combine the Parks and Recreation commissions, is assured a win with 13,501 votes for and only 3,666 against;
- Measure D, which seeks to increase the number of harbor commissioners, is much closer, with 8,624 for and 6,575 against;
- and Measure E, which seeks to reduce the number of members of the Architectural Board of Review, is also a shoo-in, with 10,099 for and 5,349 against.
According to the latest figures, more than 38 percent of Santa Barbarans had voted by yesterday, or 17,802 out of 46,718 registered voters. There is an estimated 4,000 votes left to be counted, which will bump that percentage to about 21 percent.
UPDATE, 9:30 p.m.: Indy reporter and longtime Santa Barbara political junkie Nick Welsh called in after hanging around City Hall with some analysis. After speaking with political consultant Mary Rose, who worked on the brief but preemptively failed Iya Falcone campaign for mayor, and others, Welsh explained that there’s a lot of post-game chatter going on to try and explain the early results.
With Grant House and Bendy White — who both received a heavy and sustained attack in mailers paid for by Randy Von Wolfswinkel — leading the pack but Von Wolfswinkel’s conservative council candidates Michael Self and Frank Hotchkiss pulling up the open seats number three and four, it’s easy to be confused. Why did the attacks backfire but the support work?
Welsh said that the going thinking is that Santa Barbara’s large liberal Democratic camp was split all over the place — thereby lacking the consensus needed to pull a third or fourth candidate into victory — but that Santa Barbara’s conservatives were probably just focused on getting Self and Hotchkiss in, even so much as simply voting for those two and sending in the ballot. “At the end of the day,” said Welsh, “that probably was enough to put them over the top.” Cathie McCammon, who was the third leg in the conservative slate, finds herself way down, so her connection to the conservatives clearly did not click.
Meanwhile, there’s Measure B, which many political watchers thought would pass easily. But proponent Bill Mahan was shaking his head in City Hall after he found out that the initiative to lower building heights was losing by more than 400 votes. Although that gap could be easy to fill with as many as 4,000 ballots still to be counted, the thinking is that these later ballots will be those influenced by the recent get-out-the-vote campaigns of liberal Democrats and PUEBLO, both groups that are against Measure B
“These are going to be votes that are going to be trending against Measure B,” predicted Welsh. “Although the gap is numerically not insurmountable, it’s probably not going there.” Welsh reports that Mahan “was not optimistic that his initiative was going to change course.”
As for the hundreds of thousands spent by Van Wolfswinkel? “I don’t think the money did that much except galvanize people into the voting booth,” said Welsh, explaining that when all is said and done, the 21,000 expected ballots is “historically a better than respectable turnout.” Nonetheless, it’s pretty clear that the support didn’t hurt Self or Hotchkiss, and that a new council makeup appears to be on the horizon.
Stay tuned to independent.com for repeated coverage throughout the evening, including reports from the various victory and defeat parties around downtown.
Related Links
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.
Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This






Previous Month


Comments
Discussion Guidelines
For the extra 1,000 or so votes each that Van Wolfswinkel added to Hotchkiss, Self, and McCammon beyond their circle of friends, figure that cost him about $200 per vote.
And his huge expenditures probably made the difference in Measure B, but not the difference Van Wolfswinkel had hoped for -- instead putting the No on B campaign on the map and simultaneously fueling a backlash against outsider Big Bucks.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
binky (anonymous profile)
November 3, 2009 at 11:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Could it be that the grumpy old Yes on B folks got their comeuppance today? I've said this all along: if it was good enough for Pearl Chase it's good enough for us! Building height limits are already IN the City Charter. If it ain't broke, don't fix it--and no more "blue lines" or bulging bulb-outs either, please!
How about tackling some REAL issues, like JOBS and gang grafitti???
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
maximum (anonymous profile)
November 4, 2009 at 12:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Aunt Pearl wins again....
As for the candidates crying "the opposition lied, that's why it passed"... hogwash. Sure, the Cottage rebuild angle sounded ominous but the fact is that Measure B was so poorly written that the City Council had vowed to "write an ordinance" to fix the rebuilding snafu... something the backers of Measure B never acknowledged as it showed how poorly written their pet project really was.
The reason that it did not pass is that it was a lame idea. One that would encourage the exact opposite of what Pearl worked so hard to preserve in our city - proper planning.
"High Rise" buildings are not in our future. Pearl already ensured that, no need to fix what ain't broke.
What does need fixing is the attention to proper setbacks and architectural review... let's see if these new folks will get back to the basic procedures that Pearl already had a hand in.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
cartoonz (anonymous profile)
November 4, 2009 at 2:51 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Well, we got our Progressive mayor and looks like two Progressive City Council members, but too bad about the 3rd one (Self or Hotchkiss). Santa Barbara has been a beautiful, Progressive, Green city for Peace for some time. I sincerely hope that the Right Wing addition to the council will not change that. CONGRATULATIONS HELENE, GRANT & WHITE! I am so sorry that Dianne Channing did not make it. She is a good friend and would have made a great council member!
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
vlhamilton (anonymous profile)
November 4, 2009 at 9:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
In case it isn't clear, we will be plagued with both the aptly-named Self and the opaque Hotchkiss on the new City Council formation.
Joining their barren soul-mate Francisco, we will see how well this conservative "cabal" governs from a strong minority position; the job is hard enough for anyone, but the two new single issue council-folk will have a tougher time than most if they follow their dim whims.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
binky (anonymous profile)
November 4, 2009 at 10:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It seems wrong that we only got to vote for three candidates, but four were elected. If we'd been able to vote for four, Dianne Channing and David Pritchett might both have been elected, as progressives wouldn't have divided their votes between the two of them: we could have voted for both. I suggest future ballots offer the ability to vote for an additional candidate when a councilmember may be elected to a different office.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
jimstoic (anonymous profile)
November 4, 2009 at 3:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)
vlhamilton:
Would you say you are happy with the current state of our City? If being a "Progressive, Green City for Peace" got us to where we are now...I shutter to think where we will be at the end of another "progressive" term.
We need leaders that will be tough on crime and pro-business. I truly hope the new Mayor can add these two items to her agenda.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
sbmomandpop (anonymous profile)
November 5, 2009 at 8:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Post a comment