• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    Balancing Act

    Goleta Examines Wetlands and Growth


    Thursday, November 5, 2009
    By Ben Preston (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    If there is one word that can be used to describe the Goleta General Plan update process, it’s “confusing.” With many elements already addressed by the city’s Planning Commission and City Council, amendments to Track 3 of the General Plan — described by planning staff members as the plan’s overarching philosophy, or how the city will be shaped over the next 20 years — finally went before the council Tuesday to undergo review and receive public comment. Updates to Tracks 1, 2, and 2.5 of the General Plan, which have already been approved by the council, dealt with housing, minor revisions to the plan, and building standards, respectively. Track 3 has been one of the most contentious facets of the update process, mainly because members of the public have been able to actually discern its meaning. Tracks 4 and 5 deal with specific projects — such as Bacara Resort & Spa’s plan to build 62 hotel condominium units close to the existing hotel — as well as the city’s sphere of influence which, says planning staff, will continue to change indefinitely.

    <strong>Even Steven:</strong>  Steve Chase, director of Goleta’s Planning and Environmental Services Department, said that without planning flexibility, the city would lack many of the conveniences it enjoys today.
    Click to enlarge photo

    Paul Wellman (file)

    Even Steven: Steve Chase, director of Goleta’s Planning and Environmental Services Department, said that without planning flexibility, the city would lack many of the conveniences it enjoys today.

    Based upon public response at Tuesday’s City Council meeting, the hot-ticket items in Track 3 were creek and wetland setbacks and the city’s growth control ordinance. Over the past several months, the Goleta Planning Commission has dedicated exhaustive amounts of time and staff effort to wrangling through the minute details of Track 3, with public meetings that often lasted several hours. Steve Chase, director of Planning and Environmental Services, said his staff’s suggested changes reflected a balance between community needs and protection of natural resources, highlighting the significance of Goleta’s location between the more urban City of Santa Barbara and the bucolic hills, coastal plateau, and mountain peaks of the Gaviota Coast. “Goleta is the transition from urban to open space,” he said, suggesting that buffers between development projects and creeks and wetlands, among other parameters, should be more flexible than in the original iteration of the General Plan. With the proposed amendments, setback reductions could be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

    In general, commentary offered by the public fell into two camps: The usual suspects from neighborhood preservation and environmental conservation groups showed support for strong protections against overdevelopment. Business owners were more interested in the flexibility offered by examining each project on a case-by-case basis. “To protect [Goleta’s open space and natural areas], we need firm, consistent safeguards,” said Scott Cooper, who teaches an ecology class at UCSB. Eddie Harris, president of the Urban Creeks Council, called for a more detailed analysis of the creek setback guidelines. “Watershed planning should be comprehensive, analytical, and citizen-based, not arbitrary and developer-driven as this process is,” he said, echoing the concerns voiced by some that the General Plan amendments are adulterations of the document’s original, protective intent.

    While most business owners were supportive of the recommendations made by the Planning Commission staff, Bacara representative Richard Monk said that the changes on the table at Tuesday’s meeting were different from the ones proposed in 2007 and 2008. “The staff report presents only the language recommended by the environmental consultants, and does not present the language that the council actually initiated,” he said. “If [these changes] are adopted, [Bacara’s] completion phase will be impossible to build.” Further discussion by the City Council indicated that, by law, the difference between mitigated (manmade) and naturally occurring environmentally sensitive habitat area (ESHA) cannot be distinguished, according to the Coastal Act, when dealing with potential development projects. Although the Track 3 finding could jeopardize the resort’s planned hotel condominium development, Bacara will have a chance to bring the project before the council again with project-specific Track 4 amendments.

    The council approved most of the Planning Commission’s recommendations Tuesday and will continue with the remainder at its next meeting on November 17.

    Story Help (Click-ability)
    Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    Who wrote this story? Usually, Indy stories have by-lines. Where can one see all the proposed changes? Is there a printed copy at the library? --- it's difficult to read this sort of detail online (and the city has spent so much on the changes to the General Plan, the least they can do is provide hard copies.)

    It seems to me that a buffer that is flexible is no buffer at all.

    And what does it mean, “Goleta is the transition from urban to open space" -- Goleta by definition is urban and has a responsibility to protect the creeks and watersheds in its boundaries for the benefit of surrounding open space - and its residents.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    BetsyR (anonymous profile)
    November 5, 2009 at 10:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Sorry Betsy, I omitted the byline when I posted this story. It is included now.

    mike (web content manager)
    November 5, 2009 at 10:44 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    For BetsyR's benefit, and any others who are trying to follow this, the printed material is available on the City of Goleta's website; see:

    http://goleta.granicus.com/MetaViewer.ph...

    you'll probably have to cut and paste this into your browser to open it.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    dalplan (anonymous profile)
    November 5, 2009 at 1:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    "Completion phase..."

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    FightWoo (anonymous profile)
    November 5, 2009 at 5:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Yes, "completion phase"...our Bacara last phase, at this point in time, so far, is beautiful 50's style condos over the creek where the Snowy Egrets hang out. It will be a nice view for the owners, if we can get the those pesky Haskell surf/beach users out of the way.

    We have just sent an email to the Raptors encouraging them to move to some trees farther away over the Veneco gas processing station as well.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    sbindyreader (anonymous profile)
    November 6, 2009 at 6 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Clear Sky
    Temperature:
    54.0°
    Wind:
    6 W

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    • CAMA Presents the Shanghai Symphony
    • Elings Park Expansion Shot Down
    • Before I Be Your Dog …
    • Flobots Return with New Record, New Vision
    • Autism Attacked Alternatively
    1. Eating Animals
    2. Montecito Pet Shop to Sell Only Rescued Dogs
    3. Producer Must Pay Landscaper
    4. Nothing to Hide Anymore
    5. Teacher in Trouble
    6. Gardens of Rare Books
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.