As a conscientiously car-less, bicycle-rider and pedestrian, I wish to add my observations on our local transportation and air quality situation to Ralph Fertig's piece titled More Bikes on City Streets. While bicycle ridership may be up, Santa Barbarans still have to breathe toxic exhaust fumes from the great number of older, highly polluting klunker vehicles that are on our streets. I must take evasive action every time one of those killer-klunkers gets near me; or I alter my route entirely to save my lungs. To bike or walk anywhere near their exhaust makes my lungs hurt and makes my airway want to close down.
Has anyone done any quick math on the proximity of the average exhaust pipe to the airways of the average bicyclist while both are operating on our city streets? Have this data and the attendant health risks been adequately described and published?
Can there be any doubt that traffic on Highway 101 increases daily, and creates a suffocating blanket of vehicle exhaust, toxic soot, and particulate? The noise from this unfriendly freeway is a constant mind-numbing roar.
The motorcycles and mopeds mentioned in Mr. Fertig's piece are likely two-stroke engines of the most deadly kind, or they are of the over-accelerated and overpowered variety, with smog and noise controls intentionally set to malfunction.
Our streets are clogged with overweight and overpowered cars, trucks, and vans driven by impatient and aggressive people showing little regard for their community. They speed on residential streets, they endanger the people living on them, and they vandalize the peace and quiet. And as a matter of course, they recklessly poison the air.
All of what I have described is easily observable on any day, in any neighborhood. Anybody can count [the offending vehicles], or smell them, or hear them.
Remember, Santa Barbara sits on a narrow coastal shelf split down the middle by major traffic corridor. A mountain range towers on one side. Major maritime shipping lanes are close off shore on the other side. Just over some of these mountains is the Central Valley, which casts its dust and particulate spume into our airshed. Add in fireplaces, barbeques, power garden tools, the dense myriad of landscaped pollens and scents, and the noxious and plentiful laundry dryer additives; then you are describing an intensely saturated air supply that is a great burden on our respiratory systems. In other words, our air is severely degraded and compacted at the best of times.
At the same time, our local climate is generally warm. The topography is mostly level. Why the hell do so many wrap themselves in huge metallic and plastic shells just to move their boney butts from point "A" to point "B"?
My respect and admiration goes to all those who reject and resist the car-motorcycle culture and the indulgent and manifestly destructive gasoline or diesel powered engines.-David Lange
+++
Mr. Fertig's article is encouraging. Isn't it too bad that the bikers don't feel obliged to follow the traffic rules? They ride several abreast, deep in conversation, out of the bike lanes so that cars have to swerve into the oncoming lane to pass them. The often don't stop at stop signs and sometimes don't even stop at red lights. It's a miracle there aren't more accidents.-Glenn Jordan
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.
Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
Previous Month


Comments
Discussion Guidelines
Glenn Jordan makes good points. Many people on bicycles violate the law (I also see many drivers speeding or pedestrians jay-walking -- they may be the same people). I see two reasons for it.
One, kids get little or no bicycle education at school or outside. Countries like the Netherlands have years of school education to create law-abiding bicyclists. Often here, kids learn from their parents who start them with a push, then send them onto the streets to learn from their peers.
Two, laws that are not enforced are not really laws. How often do we see police stopping motorists, but they ignor bicyclists riding on sidewalks, or against traffic, or running stop signs? The cyclists may not even know what they're doing is illegal.
Until those two problems are addressed, we can expect to see dangerous behavior continue.
oryx (anonymous profile)
November 25, 2009 at 7:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)
@ oryx
You are right on target. I ride, a lot, and it really ticks me off when I see such dangerous behavior from both cyclists and automobile drivers. It is so simple to teach just the basics; letting common sense handle the rest. Daniel Petry
jcrdan (anonymous profile)
November 28, 2009 at 6:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I have a different take on all this.
I commute from Solvang to Santa Barbara six days per week so I have to drive. I will not apologize for nor feel guilty about operating a motorized vehicle despite the militant Luddite culture. That having been said, I drive a 1998 mercury tracer which when I purchased it got 25/33 MPG. My main consideration for buying this car was the gas mileage which at the time was pretty good and what I could afford. If I had the $$$ I would be driving a prius which gets 50 MPG average but as I say, I don't have the money, and I'm guessing that many of the people smugly derided as driving "killer-klunkers" probably are not in a position to purchase newer cars either.
The fact that in addition to those of us who commute, many people simply are not able bodied enough to ride bicycles, and paradoxically--and speaking merely for myself--I would not dare take a chance riding given the aggressive driving habits of the average Santa Barbara drivers.
What is also curious is the fact that the comments leave out--whether intentionally or not--criticism of S.U.V. drivers. What I see here is an attack on motorcycles, old cars, and any motorized vehicle normally driven by the the working-class. It comes off as elitist to me.
Here is what I take from this: Santa Barbara's exploding population growth is taking its toll all around. Mr. Lange is another example of an angry, stressed out militant type who is going to scapegoat those who do not fit into his little anti-technology world. Don't dare address the impact our open border has had on our overcrowding situation and that the unlimited population growth we see locally is primarily the result of this, just lash out at those who have been doing what people have been doing since Henry Ford became a household name. Don't go after the chi-chi Yuppies who drive gas-sucking S.U.V's so big that they need their own zip codes, but rather go after all who either can't afford something more economical, or who don't fit into his ideal of a physically fit ÂĽbermensch.
What is also missing is the fact that I often see bicyclists zipping through stop signs and being careless so the aggressive driving habits one sees among those who drive motorized vehicles carry over into the bicycle culture, and Mr. Lange's tirade is a perfect example of aggression personified.
The truth be told, I feel sorry for David Lange but just as he is (justifiably) "tired of exhaust" and aggressive drivers, I'm tired of elitist faux-progressives who keep pushing their anti-car campaign especially when overall, the gas mileage of cars continues to improve.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
November 29, 2009 at 3:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)
While many Santa Barbarans try to close their eyes to the serious pollution problem here from cars and foreign tankers etc.--David Lange bravely reveals that the emperor has no clothes! What he states is very obvious to anyone who will simply observe the truth. Our formerly healthy lifestyle and air in Santa Barbara is no more---and it IS due, in part, to the "clunker" cars. When I am out walking nearly anywhere in town anymore, I can't get home without being bombed by exhaust down my throat. Every time I see one coming I know what I'm in for---and I'm never wrong--the clunker looking cars never fail to leave me gasping for fresh air. Yes, SUV's can also spew soot, but, even though I'm not an SUV fan, in truth many of them are newer and smogged and don't stink at all. In reply to another's comment here---indicating Mr. Lange may be elitist to fear "clunker exhaust"--- I don't think it is elitist to want to LIVE! Someone's right to drive their clunker should NOT trump my right to avoid dying of lung disease--which is on the increase here. Who cares about being p.c. when our very lives are at stake? We just need the science and the facts--and a solution. And yes--over population is at the heart of it all. I don't even want to go there on that topic though --because any proposed solution to that could ignite a firestorm of p.c. vitriol.
Mahala (anonymous profile)
January 3, 2010 at 12:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)