• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits
    <strong>ALLEGED SINNER:</strong> Former Franciscan friar David Johnson, who taught at St. Anthony's seminary, was accused of sexual abuse in two new lawsuits dating back to the 1980s. The lawsuit labels the Franciscans an ongoing public nuisance. Franciscans counter that since the scandal first erupted in 1993, no fresh accusations of abuse have surfaced. Johnson, they point out, has left the order.

    ALLEGED SINNER: Former Franciscan friar David Johnson, who taught at St. Anthony's seminary, was accused of sexual abuse in two new lawsuits dating back to the 1980s. The lawsuit labels the Franciscans an ongoing public nuisance. Franciscans counter that since the scandal first erupted in 1993, no fresh accusations of abuse have surfaced. Johnson, they point out, has left the order.


    Moral Dumping Ground

    New Sex Abuse Claims Filed Against Franciscans


    Wednesday, November 25, 2009
    By Nick Welsh (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    Sixteen years after Santa Barbara's St. Anthony seminary was first exposed as a cluster bomb of sexual abuse, the legal warfare over who did what to whom, and what should be done about it, shows little sign of abating. Two new civil complaints were recently filed by former seminary students against the Franciscan order, claiming-sometimes in excruciating detail-that they'd been sexually assaulted by former friar Dave Johnson.

    Both plaintiffs, Craig Clover and Ernesto C., first attended St. Anthony's in 1979. Both came from abusive families; both claim the sexual predations they suffered led to a life of substance abuse and emotional instability. And both contend that they'd repressed memories of their respective assaults until recently.

    Whether their claims fall within California's statute of limitations depends on how wide the California Supreme Court determines that legal window should be kept open. The plaintiffs' attorney, Tim Hale, contends that the Franciscans constitute an ongoing and abiding public nuisance-for which no statute of limitations exists-because they shuttled problem priests from one community to the next without warning unsuspecting parishioners. On the contrary, Hale charged, the Franciscans engaged in a wide array of practices designed to conceal and cover up the transgressions of pedophile priests.

    In the recent filings, Hale gave prominent placement to a 1950 letter from the San Diego Bishop to church authorities in Rome complaining, in the bitterest possible terms, of priests from Santa Barbara. "During the 13 years since this Diocese was erected, to my own personal knowledge, the Saint Barbara Province of the Franciscan Fathers has used this Diocese as a dumping ground for their moral, mental and physical problems," he wrote. "It became necessary for me some time ago to demand the withdrawal of one misfit after another." Without San Diego as a safety valve, Hale contended, Santa Barbara was forced to keep its problem priests. As a result, children in Santa Barbara were placed at uncommon risk. "I guarantee you that per capita, Santa Barbara had more of this than any other community," Hale said.

    Brian Brosnahan, the attorney representing the Franciscans, noted that nothing in the letter Hale cited mentions priestly pederasty. Instead, the complaints focus on incompetent Franciscans who failed to build desperately needed new schools on church-owned property. Brosnahan said the letter indicated the bishop wanted the Franciscans out of San Diego so that he could reward priests working in desert parishes with more choice assignments there.

    Brosnahan also disputed Hale's public nuisance claim, arguing that since the scandal broke in 1993, the Franciscans have taken pains to ensure that problem priests were not put in a position where they could abuse again. While many new lawsuits have been filed since 1993, Brosnahan insisted that there have been no allegations that sexual misconduct by Franciscan friars has taken place since that time. Instead, Brosnahan argued that the Franciscans have been "at the vanguard" of reconciliation efforts by religious orders dealing with sexual abuse. As part of the Franciscans $25 million settlement in 2006, he pointed out, the Provincial agreed to meet with survivors, hear their stories, and personally apologize.

    Later, he claimed, Father Dave Johnson called him into his room and ordered him to kneel and take off his clothes.

    Craig Clover and Ernesto C. would add two more to the list of 62 minors molested by Franciscan friars in Santa Barbara since 1960. Clover, a native of Phoenix Arizona, reported that soon after arriving he had his testicles fondled and his anus digitally penetrated-under the guise of a medical exam-by a friar with no medical expertise. Later, he claimed, Father Dave Johnson called him into his room and ordered him to kneel and take off his clothes. When Clover balked, he said Johnson and an unnamed accomplice yanked off his trousers, held him face down, and sodomized him with a foreign object. On another instance, Clover charged that Fr. Gus Krumm-then wearing boxer shorts-pressed him against the wall and thrust his groin onto his backside.

    When Clover returned to Phoenix, he alleged, he notified Thomas O'Brien, his parish priest, who would later become that city's bishop. After O'Brien consulted Fr. Mel Jurisich, then running St. Anthony's, O'Brien berated him, Clover charged, asking if he understood it was a mortal sin to lie about a priest. More recently, O'Brien, it turns out, struck a deal with Mariposa prosecutors granting him immunity from charges of covering up crimes of priestly pedophilia dating back to 1979. And five years ago, O'Brien was found guilty of felonious hit and run, after he accidentally killed a pedestrian with his car and fled the scene.

    Brosnahan, the Franciscan's attorney, called Clover's account of conversations involving O'Brien and Jurisich "a total fabrication." He said the Franciscans were investigating Clover's claims against Johnson, whom he acknowledged had been the subject of a similar lawsuit in the past. Johnson, he said, is no longer a Franciscan. Brosnahan acknowledged that Johnson and Krumm both had admitted to sexual misconduct in the past, but Johnson had denied the allegations recently leveled against him.

    Clover reportedly suppressed all memory of these events until recently, when he encountered Johnson-or a man who resembled him-outside of a movie theater.

    Ernest C., who came from a broken home in Richmond, California, charged that Fr. Johnson got him drunk on half a bottle of Bacardi rum during a school camping trip to Yosemite, and then assaulted him in a tent. For years, he would consider Johnson a close mentor, inviting him to officiate over his wedding in 1985, and writing him several letters expressing his admiration and affection for the priest. Only during subsequent substance-abuse counseling sessions would he come to remember that Johnson had abused him.

    In his legal filings, Hale contended the Franciscans should have known that Fr. Krumm posed a threat because, as a seminary student, he got in trouble for contracting a case of the crabs from having sex with an adolescent male. Brosnahan countered that he had spoken with the noviate instructor whom Hale alleged read Krumm the riot act for getting crabs. "It just didn't happen," Brosnahan stated. I

    "We have not done that. It's not our policy. It is currently our policy to report all claims to law enforcement authorities."

    Initially, the Franciscans defended Krumm, stating that he'd been investigated and that three psychiatrists had concluded he wasn't guilty. In 2002, however, Krumm admitted he'd molested boys while at Saint Anthony's. Shortly after this admission, he left the priesthood. In the meantime, however, he'd been transferred to parishes in Oregon, Sacramento, and Orange County. In no instances, Hale objected, was anyone notified or warned. "Hale has the theory that we should send out mass mailings to everybody," Brosnahan said. "We have not done that. It's not our policy. It is currently our policy to report all claims to law enforcement authorities."

    Former pedophile priests have struck since 1993, Hale contends, in at least two instances. He claimed that Fr. Steven Kain, a pedophile priest once assigned to St. Anthony's, had molested again in 2005 while at St. William's at Los Altos. Brosnahan dismissed this too as "a fabrication," stating the alleged witness Hale cited in making this claim did not corroborate Hale's representation: Brosnahan contended that the witness acknowledged hearing reports of sexual abuse about Kain, but those allegations involved events that took place prior to 1993 and did not take place at St. William's.

    Hale said he'd be happy to let a jury decide. Hale also cited the case of Fr. Louis Ladenberger, who never taught at St. Anthony's, but who left the Franciscans in 1996, after having been sent for psychological treatment twice in the 1980s for inappropriate behavior. Last year, Ladenberger was sentenced to five years in Idaho for having sex with two boarding school students. Hale contends the Franciscans need to warn a wider community about their friars' past misdeeds. "If you own a dog and it becomes rabid and you abandon it as a result and it bites someone," he asked, "aren't you responsible?"

    The two newest cases will go before separate Santa Barbara judges sometimes next month.

    This story has been added to and amended for accuracy since its original posting.

    Story Help (Click-ability)
    Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    What a surprise that the Franciscan's deny these allegations!

    buckwheat (anonymous profile)
    November 25, 2009 at 8:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Franciscans are a good target for local media. But so many children come from abusive families as well. I wish we would recognize that this abusive behavior did not just exist at St. Anthony's Seminary, but in young people's own homes and with family members and neighborhood friends. Please stop focusing so much on clergy. Sadly so many others have committed horrible crimes against youth. I know so so many good people who are priests and ministers. Please acknowledge that fact in your reporting. Bad apples are few. Goodness prevails in religious communities and secular ones..

    GiGi (anonymous profile)
    November 25, 2009 at 9:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    They create their own bulls' eye when the abuses are ongoing and protected by institutional loyalty.

    God (anonymous profile)
    November 25, 2009 at 9:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    To GiGi - the crimes against these children was magnified by the Catholic Church's complicity in concealing what they knew from the police, the community at large, the victims' families, and just moving the abusers around to other parishes where they could continue their abuse. I guess it's a mortal sin to tell a lie about a priest, but it's OK to rape children - I don't think so.

    Finally, "God" is correct - the Catholic Church put the bull's eye on their own back. And, I acknowledge that there are good priests and ministers, however, I would NOT agree that "bad apples were few". We all know there were many - we don't even know how many, going back in history. There was a pervasive, systematic coverup and collusion by the Catholic Church in this sordid story of how the Catholic Church has always had two sets of rules - those for the "believers", and those for those who are sanctioned by The One True Church - the priests on up to the Popes themselves, "infallible" as they are.

    Finally, GiGi is correct that "many others have committed horrible crimes against youth", and they need to be exposed and punished whenever possible. The ruination of innocent lives is not limited to the Catholic Church, though the Catholic Church institutionalized and lent a blind eye to this type of abhorrent behavior and did nothing to stop it until they were sued, and it became a financial matter.

    Gandalf47 (anonymous profile)
    November 25, 2009 at 11:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    You're missing the point, GIGI. Yes, sadly, these abuses happen in a variety of contexts. However, it's the insitutional cover-ups that set entities like the Franciscans apart. The assignment of 26 perpetrators to Santa Barbara since 1960 qualifies as much more than a few "bad apples," and illustrates a Franciscan mindset and disturbingly corporate mentality that places greater value on the interests of the institution than on the welfare of children and vulnerable adults. The only way this will ever change is when the good priests you describe finally reject the culture of secrecy that produced the clergy abuse scandal, and insist on informing the public when there are new reports of abuse, and when perpetrators are re-assigned to their parishes/communities. Until then, the media coverage to which you object is critical to helping parents and other child custodians obtain the information they need to protect today's children from abuse.

    sacto76 (anonymous profile)
    November 25, 2009 at 11:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Truth must be faced and acknowledged. If this sexual abuse occurred, it must be prosecuted. No statute of limitations should be invoked whatsoever.

    It would be nice to know where this alleged pedophile "Johnson" is and if he's still wielding it with reckless abandon. Once a pedophile . . . .

    And when are we finally going to say enough to organized religion and compel them to start paying their own way via taxes.Tax ALL churches NOW!

    I hope these new victims can find justice if not absolution.

    Draxor (anonymous profile)
    November 25, 2009 at 12:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    "But whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to sin, it would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck, and he were drowned in the depth of the sea." -Jesus Matt 18:6

    AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
    November 25, 2009 at 2:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Religious organizations are a pernicious plague on humanity. And yes, I mean it. I am confident that as we humans continue to evolve as intelligent creatures, religious organizations' power over people will continue to decline as it is currently doing world wide. (please know that I am not impugning spirituality) Hopefully christianity will be the first to go followed closely by the others. Just a question, how many millions of humans have been slaughtered, raped and conquered in the name of their god, jesus christ?(no capitalization is intended)

    cattleman36 (anonymous profile)
    November 30, 2009 at 8:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Very true, but power doesn't go away it just shifts somewhere else. Like the song says"Everybody wants to rule the world"

    AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
    November 30, 2009 at 10:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Very well written article. The comments are all in good taste even though every person has a different view. Abuse in any form by any person is reprehensible It is indeed very often suppressed in the memory out of fear, guilt and being told that what happened did not happen. So the abused then start to doubt themselves.

    This is not just a Santa Barbara or Franciscan problem. It is widespread and it is time for the proper authorities to quit covering up for the perpetrators. That is the graver sin that has so incensed us.

    There will be many more individuals who will "come awake" and make their horror stories known, And, as when they were young and abused, they will also not readily be believed now as adults relating the incidents. This is not about money or punishment, but about closure and getting on with life.

    bajamama (anonymous profile)
    December 1, 2009 at 12:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    "Hopefully christianity will be the first to go followed closely by the others. Just a question, how many millions of humans have been slaughtered, raped and conquered in the name of their god, jesus christ?(no capitalization is intended)" -cattleman36-

    Is this why there is so much conflict and drug use in Postmodern Hollywood? (A place which is Ground Zero for ideology similar to yours)

    Christianity doesn't teach that you rape people. Also, Pol Pot, Joseph Stalin, and Mao killed people in ways that would make Hitler's S.S. proud and while Hitler was not an atheist per se, he also did not subscribe to any religion.

    Christianity has pretty much left the building but for some reason we have a surge in gangs, road rage, and a general sense of fear and distrust in our society.

    The facts I've presented are not synonymous with your idea that a post-Christian society will be the societal utopia you envision--as the day-to-day conflict you see all across America and the breakdown of the family unit prove.

    It's all about the greed of human nature, which Christianity addressed.

    I wonder how long Jesus would last in today's world before they executed him again.

    billclausen (anonymous profile)
    December 1, 2009 at 3:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Hopefully not very long!

    cattleman36 (anonymous profile)
    December 3, 2009 at 9:51 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Log in to comment

    Forgotten your password?

    Sign up

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Rain
    Temperature:
    49.0°
    Wind:
    10 N

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • SBIFF Turns 25
    • Sandra Bullock Comes to SBIFF
    • Prosecutorial Throwdown
    • Costly Romance of the Rails
    • Ozomatli Gears Up for SOhO Gig
    • Kareem Abdul-Jabbar Comes to S.B.
    1. SB Bank & Trust Downsizing
    2. Hughes Morton: Surfer, Philanthropist
    3. SBIFF Directors’ Panel Includes Cameron, Tarantino
    4. Roberts Beats McCaw, $900,000 - $0
    5. What Americans Really Have to Fear
    6. Film Festival Program Announced
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2010 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.