No on B Seconded

Thanks to the Independent for its thoughtful position statement in opposition to Measure B. Your characterization of the 40-foot limit as “capricious and arbitrary” was right on target, and should be the clear compelling reason for all citizens to oppose this poorly constructed proposal. A large percentage of existing landmark buildings demonstrates that 40 feet is an unreasonably low limit for our city. It is indeed our city’s heritage to build artfully within the traditional 60-foot limit, and attempting to nullify this historically successful formula due to concerns over two or three recent buildings represents an unnecessary assault on Santa Barbara’s rich architectural traditions.

Our city’s planning department and design review boards have consistently demonstrated their ability to adjust to community concerns as they develop. Exerting appropriate control while supporting architectural quality are essential elements of a nuanced planning approach. We are nowhere near the need for the “last resort” solution that Measure B represents.-Brian Hofer

To submit a comment on this article, email or visit our Facebook page. To submit information to a reporter, email

event calendar sponsored by:

Plastic Bags? Throw ‘Em Away

Santa Barbara County makes recycling rules tougher in face of exacting standards.

UCSB Ranked Number Three in UC System

Cal and UCLA took the one and two spots.

Pini Property Fights Continue

As an epic attorney battle continues in the Dario Pini receivership, a tenant is getting fed up.

MTD Takes Stand Against Prop. 6

The bus company is concerned about the state funding it relies upon.

County Half-Jokes It Wants Cannabis ‘World Domination’

A government executive implores growers to get legal before time runs out.