• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    Paul Wellman

    PHOTO FINISH: After years of losing money, Earl Warren Showgrounds decided to shut down its satellite wagering facility, effective September 28. Showgrounds CEO Scott Grieve blamed competition from the Internet, Santa Maria and Ventura betting houses, and the Chumash Casino.


    Why Satellite Wagering Failed

    A Gambler Explains Why Earl’s Place Failed and How to Save Televised Horse Betting


    Thursday, September 17, 2009
    By Matt Kettmann (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    With the final coffins being nailed into Earl’s Place — the satellite wagering facility located at Earl Warren Showgrounds — this week, at least one longtime horserace gambler isn’t letting the news go quietly into the night.

    “It’s a shame,” said Vernon Marquez, a Camarillo resident who’s been betting on horses since 1958 and was a frequent Earl’s Place visitor. A stock market player by day, Marquez — who consulted with major racetracks for 15 years and invented a number of betting options, such as the “rotating daily double” and “super high five” — said that Earl Warren “should have stayed open through the Breeder’s Cup [in early November]. It’s not very thoughtful what they’re doing at all.”

    That would have been a proper thank-you to the regulars, said Marquez, who explained that horse players’ fees paid for the construction of Warren Hall, the nicer building that once housed the satellite operation before the gamblers were relegated back to their original, less fancy digs where they play today. “Earl Warren could have been successful,” said Marquez. “They had the big building that was built entirely by horse players’ money, but they essentially confiscated the building. That set it back in the dark ages.”

    Because Internet betting is easy, Marquez agrees that Earl’s Place may have been inevitably doomed. The entire system, said Marquez, “is falling apart. It’s in terrible trouble.” To Marquez, the reason is simple. “When they gave the exclusive franchise to the state, they shot themselves in the foot,” he explained, criticizing California’s laws that keep these wagering facilities on fairgrounds. “They were running it like a 7-11 store,” he opined, “and it’s a professional business for gamblers. They weren’t running it in a casino format.” Marquez says that state employees don’t have the experience needed to run a gambling house, and thinks that satellite facilities don’t know their audience. “They offered no perks, and gambling is a perk business,” said Marquez, explaining that in Las Vegas or other casinos, gamblers are treated very well and that’s why they keep coming back.

    Marquez believes satellite wagering could be successful in California if the state switched to a Arizona-type format, where gambling is allowed in certified restaurants and bars. “They need to be smaller but more easily accessible facilities and they have to be facilities that are looking to get income through food, beverage, and wagering sales,” he explained, and he has heard that someone in Santa Barbara might be looking into this possibility.

    Of course, Marquez says he saw this all coming in the mid-‘90s, and warned the industry accordingly in a paper that he wrote for Del Mar Racetrack and Oak Tree Racing, but they were too slow to act. “If you date it, I was years ahead of the industry,” he said. “Everything that has happened in the industry I predicted it happening.” Today, aside from moving satellite wagering to more hospitable locations, he recommends racing on fewer days, shifting to four days per week with 10 races per day rather than five with eight races, as is common now.

    As for Earl Warren, Marquez is unrelenting. “When they walk away,” he said, “they’ll have two buildings that the race track customers paid for.”

    Related Links

    • Previous Earl's Place Article
    Story Help (Click-ability)
    Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    With all the Indian Casinos in this state they really need to rethink the industry. At this point all the income goes to the native nations, why not open three zones within the state where tourism is highest (LA/SD/SF) and have some Casino Resorts with about 5 big ones each? Combine that with slots at some of the fairgrounds as other states have done and it would be a revenue stream that could go for schools, public safety without raising taxes.

    The cat is out the bag in terms of Casinos in the state why not do something to benefit the majority of Californians and create a few jobs.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    pointssouth (anonymous profile)
    September 17, 2009 at 12:30 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Better yet, why not get California out of the gambling business entirely? It's just a horribly regressive tax.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    SezMe (anonymous profile)
    September 18, 2009 at 1:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    who cares

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    JamPenn (anonymous profile)
    September 18, 2009 at 2:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    I say we allow wagering on politics and the shenanigans going on in Congress.

    A sure bet winner every time: Nothing gets done.

    Cha-ching!

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    Draxor (anonymous profile)
    September 18, 2009 at 7:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Clear Sky
    Temperature:
    50.0°
    Wind:
    5 NE

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • The Independent’s Local Heroes
    • Viggo Hits The Road
    • Elings Park Expansion Shot Down
    • Doggie See, Doggie Do
    • Alison Saar at Atkinson Gallery
    • Sampling My Syrah, Sharing Your Chardonnay
    1. Eating Animals
    2. Producer Must Pay Landscaper
    3. High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    4. My Swine Flu Experience
    5. Teacher in Trouble
    6. Bella Dolce Bakery Is Born
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.