Paul Wellman
Santa Barbara Sheriff Bill Brown holds a press conference on the latest developments in the April 15, 2010 killing of Robert Simpson at Hendry's Beach.
Sheriff Announces Capture of Simpson’s Accused Killer
Former Stabbing Suspect Rudy Gallegos Released; Adrian Robles in Custody for Hendry’s Beach Homicide
Thursday, April 22, 2010
After a week of speculating, reporting, and commenting on what may or may not have occurred at Hendry’s Beach on April 15, Sheriff Bill Brown emerged at a press conference Thursday afternoon to bring the public up to speed on what his detectives think really happened to Robert Simpson who was killed near the beach in a tragedy that has not only struck the community as a whole, but also the community that loved the man some knew as Rob and others knew as Bobby I.
Adrian Robles
Most importantly, the sheriff revealed his detectives are confident they have the man they believe murdered Simpson — 21-year-old Adrian Robles, a known gang member, according to Brown.
And equally important, Brown said a man originally implicated in the homicide, 21-year-old Rudy Gallegos, was released from Santa Barbara County Jail after officials determined he was not involved in the murder.
What they believe did happen was a physical confrontation between Gallegos and Simpson behind the Boathouse restaurant off of Hendry’s Beach, a scuffle that started out amicably, Brown said, but escalated to words and then physical exchanges. While it isn’t clear what the altercation was about, alcohol was a factor on both sides, Brown said, but to what extent it was a factor isn’t clear at this point. That exchange had come to an end, however, when Simpson was allegedly attacked by Robles, who used a “cutting instrument of some type,” Brown said, to fatally injure Simpson. Simpson died shortly after from a wound to the neck. Brown said physical evidence had been recovered, but wouldn’t say if the weapon was among the evidence collected.
Paul Wellman
Santa Barbara Sheriff Bill Brown holds a press conference on the latest developments in the April 15, 2010 killing of Robert Simpson at Hendry’s Beach.
According to Brown, Robles ran from the scene, got into a car with two females, and as they were leaving Gallegos jumped in as well, the four of them leaving together just as they had come to the park together. Almost immediately, the vehicle was identified and Gallegos was as well. The vehicle was allegedly found to belong to Brittany Weiler, and by 10:48 that night, had been located. She was arrested the next day and has been charged with accessory to murder after the fact. Weiler, who also has a pending misdemeanor charge for allegedly bringing her cell phone into the county jail visitation area, had a court hearing Thursday morning, but it was continued.
The next day, Saturday, around 10 p.m., a 17-year-old female was also arrested for accessory to murder. Over the course of the next few days, detectives would interview more than 70 witnesses, including 40 extensively. It was “like putting a jigsaw puzzle together,” Brown said.
Authorities had surveillance on Gallegos since the night of the incident, arrested him around 3:15 p.m. Sunday, and conducted a search warrant at his home shortly thereafter. After interviews, Gallegos was booked into jail.
This content requires Flash and Javascript.
You are viewing this message because JavaScript is not installed, enabled, or you are using a mobile device with poor JavaScript support.
If JavaScript is installed and enabled, you may need to install or upgrade your Adobe Flash player:
Detectives were able to track down additional leads on Robles in the days following him, and early Wednesday morning, at around 12:15, he was arrested at the home of friends in Ventura County, friends who authorities don’t believe knew of Robles’s alleged involvement in the Santa Barbara murder. Today detectives conducted a search of his residence on Cook Avenue in Santa Barbara.
Paul Wellman
Senior Deputy District Attorney Hilary Dozer explains why the DA’s office won’t be filing charges against Rudy Gallegos in the killing of Robert Simpson.
Wednesday afternoon, according to Brown, detectives took Robles and Gallegos and placed them in a few physical lineups. Witnesses “identified Gallegos as being in a fight, but Adrian Robles as the suspect who stabbed the victim,” Brown said. The decision was made shortly after to not charge Gallegos, a mutual decision made Wednesday night by sheriff’s department personnel and investigators in the District Attorney’s office along with Senior Deputy District Attorney Hilary Dozer. Gallegos, whose mother earlier in the day Wednesday had insisted that not only was her son innocent, but that he had turned his back on the gang lifestyle, was released late Wednesday night.
At the same time news reports were naming her son as a possible killer, noting potential past ties to gangs and as online news commenters vilified Gallegos, his mother, Lupe, said her son had begun attending church at the urging of a friend, had been attending Bible studies, and had enrolled in Santa Barbara City College, where he wants to give it a shot at playing football. He also planned to get his tattoos removed. “The news is making him to be a horrible person that he’s not,” Lupe Gallegos said. She said when she talked to him he had been at peace.
As for Robles, criminal charges have yet to be filed. Dozer had not received a report from the sheriff’s department as of Thursday afternoon, and was anticipating it coming to him sometime Friday. Any charges he will file against Robles, who has one felony charge in his past, wouldn’t happen until after that. But Brown said the investigation showed clearly who was behind the death of Robert Simpson. “We’re very confident we have the person who committed this crime,” Brown said. He noted the impact the crime, done in a very public and popular place and in a “senseless nature,” had already had on the community. But Brown said this case sent a clear message to criminals: “We will hunt you down, we will arrest you, we will take you to jail, and we will take you to the bar of justice.”
Related Links
Comments
This is what happens when you elect people who say it is OK to break the law by declaring Santa Barbara a Sanctuary City. It says you can break the law to come here and so we now have a large portion of the population here that have broken the law to get here and it is OK to steal from us by using our services and schools. What do you all expect?
zigot (anonymous profile)
April 23, 2010 at 12:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"While it isn’t clear what the altercation was about, alcohol was a factor on both sides,"
All booze...all the time.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
April 23, 2010 at 3:54 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Why isn't Gallegos an accessory to murder as well? He got into the car. Why would the passenger, presumably the 17 year old, be an accessory and not Gallegos?
And really?! Do you think those Vatos down in Ventura didn't know?? Harboring a criminal makes you an accessory as well!
mesa_loc (anonymous profile)
April 23, 2010 at 7:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)
mesa_loc
Just guessing but it appears that the women and the girl were helping Robles escape but Gallegos jumped in the car at the last minute. Perhaps the girl will also be released. We, the general public will not know all the facts until after all trials are completed and maybe not even then.
Don't forget, you cant convict people without evidence and "knowing" is not evidence. We also do not know to what extent anybody questioned cooperated with police.
I think the police are doing a great job in this case.
Bill, I am opposed to illegal immigration. I have relatives with spouses from other countries that followed all rules and so needed to wait some time before they could come to the US. However, I see no evidence in any reports that this crime had anything to do with illegal immigration. In fact, although the suspect is a gang member, I have seen no reports indicating that this was a gang incident.
think the police are doing a great
valleygirl (anonymous profile)
April 23, 2010 at 7:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)
oops, sorry Bill, my last paragraph was for Zigot.
valleygirl (anonymous profile)
April 23, 2010 at 7:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The article fails to mention if the girls are still being held as accessories to the crime. And if they are, WHY isn't Gallegos being held for the same?
He was in the fight, he jumped in the car, he knew who stabbed Bobby. ?????
Analog8 (anonymous profile)
April 23, 2010 at 10:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The question of why the two girls were charged with accessory to murder after the fact and Gallegos was not was asked of the sheriff at yesterday's press conference, and the sheriff declined to elaborate.
I apologize for not mentioning this in the story, but I hope this clarification helps explain this point. It could be the state of mind of the parties at the time, it could be actions that were done after the fact we don't know about, or any other range of actions or events, I imagine.
Chris (Chris Meagher)
April 23, 2010 at 10:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)
If one wants to play the popular guessing and conjecture game, one could imagine Gallegos co-operated in return for a full dismissal by turning in Robles and informing the Police where he was hiding. When Robles was arrested information and his picture were withheld to prevent compromising the line-up. However, the girls are a mystery. Perhaps they refused to name Robles? Who knows until we hear the next instalment.
samuel (anonymous profile)
April 23, 2010 at 10:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Chris
"The question of why the two girls were charged with accessory to murder after the fact and Gallegos was not was asked of the sheriff at yesterday's press conference, and the sheriff declined to elaborate."
"was not / was asked" ....... ?................ One would imagine the latter applies for the Sheriff did decline to elaborate.... :-)
samuel (anonymous profile)
April 23, 2010 at 11:14 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I apologize. It's never good when a reporter has to correct a clarification.
Yes, the sheriff WAS asked the question, and declined to elaborate.
Chris (Chris Meagher)
April 23, 2010 at 11:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Rudy did in fact snitch, even Stevie Wonder can see that one. To Zigot- Quit it, and go watch some more Fox News. Would you make the same comments towards John Gardner?
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
April 23, 2010 at 12:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
April 23, 2010 at 12:42 p.m.
Judging by his MySpace page and the company he keeps, Gallegos is doing an excellent job of turning his back on the gang lifestyle. Wake up mom!!!
SBRes99 (anonymous profile)
April 23, 2010 at 1:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Az2SB--it has been stated, and probably will be clarified at length--at a later date--that there was an amicable altercation, between Rob and Gallegos which escalated and then was OVER. That alcohol was involved, yes,but that does not necessarily mean drunk behavior.
The altercation may have been verbal rather than physical.And you are saying he was engaging in "behavior with guys" whereas, unless you were an actual witness, you do not know that. At this time, it has been stated that there was an altercation between two men, and when ended, a third man came from behind with a sharp instrument--not yet identified- and slashed a throat.. I do not see where age comes into play in this scene.
Physical exchanges could have been just some pushing as often happens and not outright brawling. This too will be revealed. But it is NOT our business to know this now. Quit speculating.
bajamama (anonymous profile)
April 23, 2010 at 1:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Although it is reassuring to know they have the criminals in custody for the murder of a very good man and a friend of mine, I must wonder .. Is this another botched investigation and arrest by two County Departments (the Sheriff and the DA) with whom we entrust to do things right and get the job done and for which we as the public dole out a combined $300 million to those departments to be competent?
This smacks of some bumbling idiots. Please do your damn job for once and do it right for pete's sakes.
Just my Opinion. Have a Wonderful Day.
detokevilla (anonymous profile)
April 23, 2010 at 1:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)
detokevilla - that is a brazen accusation to make. From what I've seen the cops have done an excellent job of taking these criminals off the street and building a case against them. If he were my "good friend" I would be thankful and more focused on celebrating my buddy's life. The murderer was caught. They pulled in all of the people and resources to build a solid case against him. Get off the computer and mourn your friend. Your anger is misplaced.
SBRes99 (anonymous profile)
April 23, 2010 at 1:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
April 23, 2010 at 2:27 p.m.
SBR, I only wish I could agree with you. However in doing so, it would require that I set aside basic logic.
The fact is we are paying these keystone cops a great deal of money to do a competent job.
And "my friend" had a great deal of criticim or perhaps wonderment regarding the botched Tea Fire investigation by these same departments.
So I say, NO we must expect a higher standard of competence from the Sheriff and from the DA.
It's due time they ramp up their competence to match the intelligence of our community.
Put down the donuts and the immature behavior and start being law enforcement officials that are guided by the law and only the law.
detokevilla (anonymous profile)
April 23, 2010 at 3:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
detokevilla (anonymous profile)
April 23, 2010 at 3:54 p.m.
But, in this particular situation...what have they done wrong? I live right by Hendry's and they were there from just after the incident until well into the next morning. I see them all over town doing good work and I feel safe with them around. Other towns have it much worse. We're not in Harlem. I think sometimes people such as yourself take our quality of life for granted. Quality of life that is protected by the SBPD and by good, helpful law abiding, citizens in our community.
SBRes99 (anonymous profile)
April 23, 2010 at 4:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)
SBR
My best response is that we have a reasonable right to expect more from from the Sherrif Office and from the District Attorney department.
We pay they plenty. Now we expect them to act within the law and nothing less. Sadly that is utopia.
What actually happens is the Sheriff and the DA allows serious crimes to go on in our community because of political deals.
The major crime the Sheriff and DA igonores are drug dealers.They get a ton of political contributions from drug dealers. Lynn just took an $80,000 campaign loan from Dan Rainer as one example.
The dark secret about our Paradise is that according to the money request by the Sheriff and the DA, is that we arre an inner city lab for crime.
I have some friends who live in France that cancelled their annual trip to Santa Barbara because of a growing fear in Europe that Santa Barbara is a too dangerous to visit.
International tourists are finding out that something is rotten in Denmark. And they are staying away for good reasons.
detokevilla (anonymous profile)
April 23, 2010 at 5:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
April 23, 2010 at 5:12 p.m.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
April 23, 2010 at 5:13 p.m.
Shakespeare: "He's a most notable coward, an infinite and endless liar, an hourly promise-breaker, the owner of no one good quality."
(All's Well That Ends Well)
detokevilla (anonymous profile)
April 23, 2010 at 5:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"International tourists are finding out that something is rotten in Denmark. And they are staying away for good reasons."--detokevilla
-- one of the reasons being online ramblings and unsubstantiated postings as seen in the above rant.
binky (anonymous profile)
April 23, 2010 at 5:23 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Binky, Hey I enjoy the best and only the primo stuff. I don't live in fear.
But people spending $10 grand or more to visit Santa Barbara are reading articles that their life is in danger if they visit Santa Barbara.
I sent them a copy of the Sheriff telling the Board of Supervisors how bad things are and that if he did not have 1,000 more deputies, people would be dying on the streets.
So Binky that is not my opinion that is the Sheriff telling torusists to stay away from Santa Barbara.
detokevilla (anonymous profile)
April 23, 2010 at 5:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Why are my posts being removed, and for what reason?
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
April 23, 2010 at 5:58 p.m. (Suggest removal)
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
April 23, 2010 at 8:51 p.m.
Being under the influence is the cause of this.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
April 23, 2010 at 11:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Considering the antisocial and drunken behavior of people at Hendry's Beach, I think we will stay at least 100 yards out in the water when we swim by there.
sixdolphins (anonymous profile)
April 24, 2010 at 5:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
You're not deleting any of my comments...I'm beginning to feel left out.
sixdolphins (anonymous profile)
April 24, 2010 at 5:12 a.m. (Suggest removal)
SBR said: "We're not in Harlem."
Most of Manhattan, including much of Harlem, is really very safe. And New York City, Harlem included, serves as an example of a situation in which police measures, along with many other factors, have resulted in a profound decrease in crime over the past few decades.
I know this is mostly unrelated to the topic at hand, but I simply could not ignore it.
My condolences to the victim's friends and family.
rlm921 (anonymous profile)
April 24, 2010 at 4:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Rudy Gallegos + Plea Bargain = Release.
dou4now (anonymous profile)
April 24, 2010 at 9:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
rlm : Absolutely correct. Thank you for putting this into perspective. Harlem is fast becoming a fashionable address for young professionals. Old Brownstones and apartment buildings have been restored and areas cleaned up.
samuel (anonymous profile)
April 25, 2010 at 7:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)
detokevilla (anonymous profile)
April 25, 2010 at 10:46 p.m.
I have yet to encounter a f#cked-up situation that alcohol could not make worse.
scarab23 (anonymous profile)
April 26, 2010 at 10:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
SBRes99 (anonymous profile)
April 26, 2010 at 1:36 p.m.
The calculus of public opinion = the Indy removed 11 seemingly innocent opinions in this story + added two of their clarifications for a sum total that equals a cover up for the DA unethical actions
Makes one wonder.
Just my Opinion. Have a Wonderful Day !!!
detokevilla (anonymous profile)
April 28, 2010 at 9:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Draxor (anonymous profile)
May 12, 2010 at 7:34 a.m.