Adrian Robles, accused of the Hendry’s Beach stabbing death of Robert Simpson on April 15, received a continuance for his arraignment earlier today, due to a complication with the alleged gang member’s defense attorney.
Superior Court Judge William Gordon changed the date of the arraignment to May 11, at which point Robles will be expected to enter a plea on two criminal charges: murder and being a member of a criminal street gang.
According to Senior Deputy District Attorney Hilary Dozer, the murder charge carries the special circumstances of benefit to a street gang and use of a deadly weapon, along with the enhancement of being a part of a criminal street gang. While murder normally carries a sentence of 25 years to life, Dozer said Robles will face either the death penalty or life in prison if found guilty, though he said it has not been decided which penalty will be pursued.
“I believe that there is proof that this particular crime was done to benefit a street gang,” Dozer said. “The victim was not a gang member. But in the world of street gangs, respect is the biggest issue in existence.”
Much of today’s hearing was focused on the issue of who would represent Robles in his trial.
Though Robles originally requested representation from the Public Defender’s Office, Ben Bycel of Conflict Defense Associates (CDA) instead represented him at today’s arraignment, due to an unspecified conflict of interest between Robles and the Public Defender.
However, Bycel said that he was not qualified to defend Robles against capital murder charges, and asked for a 30-day continuance of the arraignment so that CDA attorney James Crowder, who is qualified to defend capital cases, could take over the defense.
Dozer opposed the length of the continuance, saying the matter could not be put off for 30 days. “We’re left in a limbo position for an amount of time that is unacceptable,” Dozer said, adding that he’s concerned that Crowder, who is already involved in another murder case, would have trouble finding time to represent Robles.
With the consent of Robles, who was separated from the courtroom by a glass screen, Gordon granted a two-week continuance. “I expect to have a lawyer here who is prepared to handle the case and can give a realistic estimate of how long it will take to enter a plea,” Gordon said.
Robles is currently in custody without bail and will appear in court again on May 11.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace






Previous Month



Comments
Easy Hilary, you will get plenty of face time for this one and its a shoo-in for the murder beef. Is it really necessary to pursue a gang charge? 25 to life is not enough?
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
April 27, 2010 at 4:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)
What difference does it make to the loved ones of the victim if he was killed by a gang member or someone who got up on the wrong side of the bed?
Murder is murder, assault is assualt and so forth, why do we need special laws for murders committed by gang members? Likewise, why do we need to tack on more time if the killer committed the deed because of the person's race or if the victim was a cop?
The taking of life should not have such arbitrary penalties.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
April 27, 2010 at 7:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Exactly, life is life. This guy could get 15 to life; he is still going to die in prison. Nothing brings the dead person back, nor does it take from the pain and suffering that they go through before they die. The vicitimizer will suffer many years of slow death also. Jail is not a treat no matter how much t.v. or ice creams they offer. Messing around and trying to tack on more charges only opens the doors for future appeals which would cost the public more money. Justice will be administered properly in this case with a life sentence being imposed, no matter if it is 15 or 50 to life.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
April 27, 2010 at 7:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I can see that a gang enhancement could act as a deterrent to others. That said, though, I don't see why he gets the defender of his choice, Crowder; surely there are other attorneys in that group who are not in trial now.
I don't think extra time should be tacked on because of the race (of either victim or perp.) but a killer of a cop is an assault on all of us, in that the police are here to protect the rest of us. Doesn't 15 to life mean he could get out after 15 years (or sooner, with good behavior?)
citti (anonymous profile)
April 28, 2010 at 4:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Yes, but what governor or his/her board members are going to let out a gang member? It doesn't happen. Charlie Manson has a 5 to life sentence, do you think he will ever get out? Very few persons with a life sentence ever get out, and if they do they have to do a lot more than have good behavior.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
April 28, 2010 at 6:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)