The Environmental Defense Center has teamed up with the City of Santa Barbara and the Corps of Engineers to create a larger-than-ever steelhead trout recovery plan for Mission Creek—a critical waterway for the trout’s migration to upstream spawning grounds. The design will be implemented in lower Mission Creek, where two old CalTrans concrete channels and two bridges that impede steelhead migration will be retrofitted into new channels that allow steelhead to once again access their historic spawning grounds.
Santa Barbara’s streams were once teeming with steelhead trout, and in the 1940s the Santa Ynez River was famed for having one the largest population of migrating steelhead in all of Southern California, according to ecologists working on this project. Urban development, channelized streams, dams, and other impediments have made this once abundant species disappear almost entirely from this region. Brian Trautwein, an environmental analyst for the Environmental Defense Center, and founder of the Urban Creeks Council, said, “Steelhead populations in Southern California have dropped by 99 percent after the construction of dams and channels, which have blocked steelhead migration in streams and rivers. However, recent efforts have led to a project of removing and modifying impediments to migrations, and [the steelhead] are expected to come back in greater numbers.”
Steelhead trout are anadromous: They migrate from the ocean back to the inland streams in which they originated to spawn. Eggs are usually deposited in slow-moving streams with loose gravel, where the fry develop quickly. Eventually, some of the trout go through a process called smoltification, which enables them to withstand the harsh and varied conditions of the seawater’s chemistry. Other fry do not go through this process, and stay in freshwater their entire life as rainbow trout. (This dual option actually gives the species an advantage, allowing it to repopulate in case of drought or disaster). In Santa Barbara, much of the gateway streams connecting steelhead trout to deep perennial pools in the mountains have been channelized, obstructed, diverted or converted to agricultural land.
Cameron Benson, from the City of Santa Barbara’s Creeks Division, said, “Steelhead have been observed attempting to migrate up Mission Creek in five of the last seven years. Unfortunately, the fish were not able to reach the upper watershed because of some concrete barriers in the creek. The city and its partners are working to remove those barriers and restore migratory access through Mission Creek for the steelhead.”
Bradbury Dam continues to be a major impediment keeping steelhead trout from migrating in higher reaches of the Santa Ynez River, and it isolates populations of rainbow trout higher in the watershed. Trautwein added, “When Bradbury Dam was built in the 1950s, steelhead populations dropped from 30,000 to less than a hundred. This was mainly due to the fact that the dam blocked access to roughly three quarters of steelhead upland habitat in the Santa Ynez River.”
The EDC and Caltrout have worked for almost 20 years to restore the connection for steelhead on the Santa Ynez River, and the State Water Resources Control Board will decide in the next year whether additional measures are required to conserve this nearly extinct species.
In Santa Barbara, steelhead migrating up Mission Creek confront a similar obstacle at Mission Tunnel, a 3.7-mile tunnel starting at Gibraltar Dam and ending in the foothills on Mission Creek.
The Environmental Defense Center, which has spearheaded many initiatives to protect and restore creeks, is now centering its focus on restoring steelhead migration throughout Mission Creek’s lower, channelized sections. This involves the mile-long CalTrans flood control channel barrier (between Carrillo and Mission Street, beneath the Highway 101 overpass). “From 1988 to 1994, the EDC led a community campaign to stop concrete channelization of the lower 1.2 miles of Mission Creek,” Trautwein said. “This decade we’ll restore passage for migrating steelhead and bring this remarkable and resilient species back from the brink of extinction.”
The EDC has worked extensively with the Army Corp of Engineers and the Santa Barbara Creeks Division to retrofit the design of that old mile-long stretch of concrete channel so that steelhead can swim beyond it into upper reaches of the watershed.
Designed in the 1930s and the 1960s for flood control, the old CalTrans concrete channels created high velocity and low water levels, which do not fit with steelhead preferences. The new design provides various refuge zones and pools for the trout to rest in; the side resting pockets have already been tested in smaller models. This design is also intended to slow water flow enough for steelhead to migrate in, while at the same time minimizing flooding in a storm event. The EDC has already secured a portion of the funding for the project, and if the remainder of the funding is secured through state, federal, or private grants, construction could begin as early as next summer.
The Environmental Defense Center also has launched a Mission Creek Outreach Program that invites the community to participate in creek cleanups and presentations on Mission Creek ecology. For more information call Trautwein at 963-1622 or email him at btraut@edcnet.org.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
The historic Old Mission Dam in the Botanic Garden will be the insurmountable barrier to steelhead passage into the upper Mission Creek watershed. However, the Rattlesnake Creek drainage branches off Mission Creek below the dam, and once the downstream barriers are removed, the fish will have access to the excellent spawning areas there. Kudos to SB Creeks Division, the EDC and all the agencies who are involved in this worthwhile project.
p.s. "Bradbury Damn" -- an appropriate spelling from the fish point of view.
JanT (anonymous profile)
August 10, 2010 at 7:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)
This is a great project! The SB Creeks Division/committee and the environmental groups that are leading these restorations are doing a great job.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
August 10, 2010 at 7:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Can't wait to go fishing what a waste of money!
buster (anonymous profile)
August 10, 2010 at 8:55 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Damn the Army Corp.
This slow and steady project and story has been around for a few years and has involved many community advocates and participants.
http://www.independent.com/news/2006/...
David_Pritchett (David Pritchett)
August 10, 2010 at 9:48 a.m. (Suggest removal)
What a great, positive story. This is why I love Santa Barbara - the City and its partners are working to improve our City by bringing back the steelhead and restoring creeks. Thank you City and EDC - keep up the good work!
goleta43 (anonymous profile)
August 10, 2010 at 5:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)
What a horribly written story.
One, Cameron Benson is not from the County's Creek Division, he is with the SB City Creeks Division.
Second, relating the Mission Creek efforts to the Santa Ynez River efforts is misleading and confusing. Gibraltar and Bradbury dams are NOT on Mission Creek.
Finally, "Bradbury Damn"? Proof positive that the Indy has fired every editor west of the, er, Bradbury Damn!
SezMe (anonymous profile)
August 11, 2010 at 2:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Nitpick all you want, SezMe, but those are minor points in a good, informative story. The Santa Ynez River was significant steelhead habitat until Bradbury Dam(n) blocked migration, and it will be key in restoration of this species.
The relevance of Gibraltar is that the Mission Tunnel, which brings water from the reservoir into the city water system, has captured the springs that formerly fed Mission Creek. After the tunnel was built and later augmented, a once-perennial stream that supported steelhead became intermittent and frequently dry in summer. The restoration of natural water flows in Mission Creek will be a factor if steelhead are to recolonize this stream.
JanT (anonymous profile)
August 11, 2010 at 6:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm sorry the steelhead have been stopped from spawning here, truly, I am, but instead of spending time and money on restoring habitat for steelhead, wouldn't it be better to put that time and money into renewable energy, retrofitting buildings to use less energy, and water conservation? Come on, guys, get your priorities straight.
sustainablefarmer (anonymous profile)
August 11, 2010 at 7:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)
sustainablefarmer: I agree on your points but I think you should consider and include restoration projects on your list. Energy policies should be top priority but all your points face great opposition by the corporate dominated masses.
It would be nice if the pseudo environmentalist policies like gouging out the earth for underground parking and other the communistic requirements for parking were completely removed from the general plans. Again blame the corporate owned masses in SUV's pulling trailers of hot rods, $30k motorcycles and ski doodoos rather than restoration advocates or sustainable farmers. They're in the same boat.
Move the old mission dam to a museum downtown and bring Gibraltor down.
DonMcDermott (anonymous profile)
August 11, 2010 at 8:32 a.m. (Suggest removal)
If the S.Cal steelhead population is so special, I've never understood why funding doesn't go towards an active catch and release breeding program. Let's cover all our bases and get some money to start such a thing (modeled after the condor and ch. islands fox programs) at the practically useless Fillmore Fish Hatchery. To improve the odds of this fish recovery, we need to look at the whole picture including habitat, access and low population numbers.
There are a multitude of smaller stream systems like Mission Creek where relatively simple and cheap(er) fixes can be instituted, so forget the upper reaches of the SYnez River which has way too many unsurmountable and costly problems. This basic approach to Mission Creek is great, just don't go the way of what is happening on Santa Paula Creek down south with poorly designed fish ladders that continually get washed out every year. I want to see major bang for the buck here, so rearing young scal steelhead might be another way to up their odds, especially when planted in the many other stream systems available.
surfrmom (anonymous profile)
August 11, 2010 at 9:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)
To SezMe:
Yes, I agree that was a ridiculous typo, and I do apologize for this. Also, the segment on Gibraltar and Bradbury DAM is not misleading, as it explains the major impediments blocking steelhead trout from their migration routs higher in the watershed, and is supplemental information on why steelhead trout are endangered in this region. A great deal of research went in to this article, and I did try my best as an intern to do it correctly. Unfortunately, I made some mistakes. I hope you can look beyond them, and understand the overall message of the article.
A big Thank you to Brian Trautwein at the Environmental Defense Center for his time, and energy in explaining the project.
Sarah Amiri
SarahAmiri (anonymous profile)
August 11, 2010 at 12:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
All interesting and most deserving some consideration. Having seen a large living steelhead pulled from lower mission creek in the 70's I'm excited to think that this could happen again.
I'm reminded of Bob Brown, Neal Taylor, Jean Sedar, Gwen and Harry H., Phil, Teri Rusaki and a group of dedicated TU members gathering and talking about such projects. Any steps in the direction of preservation and rehabilitation of both habitat and native species has merit and worth.
I see it helping our economic forecast with tourism and ecological growth and education with participation from private and public schools and business. Maybe we could utilize funds from the bed tax.
I would be willing to help as well as support steps necessary to giterdone! I'll miss participating with my kids (from Harding, LaCumbre, thru Santa Barbara High School). If I do or can stick around count me in.
...grammatical corrections, off topic personal responses send direct to me directly no need to waste the good folks with good intentions time or energy...
Ken (anonymous profile)
August 11, 2010 at 12:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)
To Sarah:
If you're going to be a writer for a newspaper, you better develop a thick skin against jerks who will nit pick you to death. Ya know what I mean? :-)
SezMe (anonymous profile)
August 11, 2010 at 1:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I do, and I thank you.
SarahAmiri (anonymous profile)
August 11, 2010 at 3:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)