Dead Prezidentz
The Angry Poodle Eats up Adult Ed, Barks and Abel Maldonado, and More
Saturday, February 13, 2010
Now is as good a time as any to celebrate Presidents Day and honor a couple of dead presidents. Abe Lincoln and George Washington were fine. But perhaps we should celebrate a few more than these two. After all, much of what’s ailing us stems directly from an acute shortage of deceased chief executives. At least those that dwell in our collective wallets.
Angry Poodle
If anyone thinks Santa Barbara only gets the sniffles when the rest of the country has pneumonia, take a hike up and down State Street. There are only so many art posters you can plaster over vacant storefronts and not look desperate. I mean how much lipstick can one pig wear?
A big see-ya-later goes out to Russ’s Camera shop, the latest in a long line of closed shops that once defined S.B.’s so-called small town charm and character. Meanwhile the Downtown Organization rails on about the homeless and the need to reconfigure downtown benches so that the occupants face the street and not the sidewalks. Talk about kicking the dog when it’s down. Why not host a pow-wow with downtown landlords to get some rent relief instead? Some landlords have been more than helpful in this regard; others, not so much.
The absence of dead presidents has been felt so acutely throughout all levels of Santa Barbara that pretty soon we’ll be begging for poltergeist. The County of Santa Barbara is looking at cutting $16 million. The City of Santa Barbara is getting ready to figure out what to do about a $9 shortfall; that’s after adjusting its budget last year to the tune of $10.5 million. At a certain point, that translates to real pain. Fewer cops; no after school programs for kids. And forget about crossing guards. The school district has already cut $12 million over the past four years and is now sharpening the knives to lop off another $6 million.
To steal a line from film director Werner Herzog, soon it will be every man for himself and god against all.
UCSB will be charging 32 percent more in fees. The availability of classes is being reduced such that, system wide, it’s taking students about a semester longer to graduate. Over the last two years, City College has had to bridge cumulative budget shortfalls totaling $10 million. Now they’re looking to slash another $2.6. It ain’t pretty. Widows and orphans are getting tossed overboard so fast they splash.
The rubber is currently hitting the road with the abrupt winnowing and culling of City College’s adult ed course load. City College administrators are proceeding with maximum lack of finesse, making a bad situation even worse than it needs to be. Art classes that once cost $50, we learn, will soon cost $330. The faculty is not consulted; the community is not consulted. It’s a fair accomplit. That is, of course, until there’s a great hue and cry by those adversely affected, demanding some explanation of the method to City College’s madness. Board members tell critics to shut up at a public meeting. But adult ed administrators, working under the gun of unreasonable dead-lines, back-track. Still, the damage of collective sticker shock is done. (See Ethan Stewart’s report for complete details.)
City College has always relied upon the kindness of its adult ed enrollees when the college needed a bond measure or two approved. But now that the shoe is on the other foot, a little reciprocity is in order. Hint: when the natives get restless, don’t tell them to shut up.
Also at risk in City College’s maelstrom are four popular pre-schools — the Oaks and Starr King being the two that come most readily to mind. The executive directors of these pre-schools — which are really parent-child workshops — have been paid over the eons by adult education. Parent volunteers handle much of the day-to-day classroom supervision. Some of these schools go back 61 years with adult ed. That’s a lot of tradition. But under the harsh light of new budget realities, City College administrators are wondering whether they can afford to maintain this traditional relationship. But again, the new regime running City College is getting dangerously low marks for consultation, explanation, or negotiation.
When it comes to the raw sewage of politics, poop runs both uphill and down. It’s the miracle of muck. While much of the pain we’re feeling stems from the recession, the Californians legislature — stuck in a protracted stated of infantile paralysis — has contributed unnecessarily to our woe. Arnold Schwarzenegger, Hollywood’s ultimate action icon, was elected Governor to blow up Sacramento and put it back together again. When he leaves office, he’ll walk away wearing the tatters of his own considerable failure. (To be fair, nobody could have pulled it off.) And the rest of us will find ourselves stuck in a much deeper hole than when he first took office.
The most recent indicator of Arnold’s essential impotence is he can’t even successfully appoint Santa Maria’s own state Senator Abel Maldonado — one of the few genuinely moderate Republicans in Sacramento — to fill the vacant and largely meaningless position of Lieutenant Governor. Assembly Democrats — lead by our own Pedro Nava, who’s now running for Attorney General — are charging against Abel on the grounds that he’s a political extortionist. At least he got something done. Note to legislature: if you’re going to be irrelevant, at least be entertaining. Instead, such antics serve only to put the “ick” back in politicks. The only real question is by whom should we be most disgusted.
In the meantime, have a happy Presidents Day. When you’re not too busy trying to remember what Rutherford Hayes looked like (like the guys in ZZ Top) and whether Grant is actually buried in Grant’s Tomb, be sure to spend lots of money. After all, our future depends on dead presidents.
Related Links
Comments
The State position of Lieutenant Governor may be "largely meaningless" until it becomes 1/3 votes by State Lands Commission, including its jurisdiction over offshore oil development in State waters.
David_Pritchett (David Pritchett)
February 14, 2010 at 12:47 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The city budget has doubled since 2000 and the population has fallen by more than 6%. Where dya think the money is coming from? The state is bankrupt. Why dya think tuition costs are rising? Anyone got a brain out there? Three of every seven people in this state live off the other 4. How is that affordable? Time to leave...
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
February 14, 2010 at 5:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)
JohnLocke, in order to double the city budget in 10 years only requires an annual increase of 7.5%. But if you subtract inflation and other effects, it begins to sound like a problem, not a disaster.
But you do not suggest ideas, you just suggest that anybody who doesn't agree with you lack a brain. Why the hell do you find it necessary to be so demeaning of those who view the world differently than you do?
If it is time to leave, are you packing? And where is this nirvana you're going to?
SezMe (anonymous profile)
February 15, 2010 at 3:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)
SezMe: "Only" 7.5 % per year is greatly in excess of the inflation rate for the same period and I see no need for the city budget to double every 10 years. Much staff has been added, unnecessarily, IMO. Compare the size of our local government to SLO or other towns of comparable size.
My comment about having a brain is a reference to the ability (or not) of people to do simple caculations and extrapolate trends into the future. OK by you if the city budget doubles again in the next 10 years? Carry that math out a few decades - population continues to shrink, businesses continue to close, fewer people to pay taxes - get it yet? How 'bout the fact that the state has been pushing a wave of deficits into the future ever since the stock market boom of 1999 provided a one time bonus to the state's revenue which our genius legislature foolishly spent on ongoing programs. Does your brain comprehend how incredibly irresponsible this was?
Now, as to where I would, go: California has the worst debt rating of any state in the union, some of the highest tax rates, is one of the least friendly to business, and has the worst education system in the country - all of which conspire to indicate that California will be in trouble for a long time to come. There are many other states with healthier financial climates, although not with our nice weather. But a nice tan doesn't pay the bills. So there are many choices. Texas, for example, has no income tax, a healthy business climate, a decent immigration program, decent public education, a legislature that has managed not to poison itself into ineffectiveness, and some quite beautiful geography. Ah, but that's where the hated Bush is from, you might say. To which I say, so what - he's one man. You might want to read the article in the Economist a couple of months ago comparing TX and CA - sobering.
I would prefer to see Californians come to their senses and realize that the state, county, and local governments have been spending money they do not have since 1999. Add to that the long term effect of Prop 13 which is essentially an unsustainable transfer of the cost of government from older homeowners to newer homeowners, the decline of the eduation system from topmost to lowest in the country, and a significant proportion of the population who are apparently incapable of learning from the fable of the goose who laid golden eggs and we have a disastrous future ahead of us. And BTW for those business-haters out there here's a news flash - taxes come from business and its employees; government does not create tax revenue - it consumes it.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
February 15, 2010 at 5:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Part 2:
So while I'm not packing yet, I'm definitely looking around.
And before you celebrate my departure, consider this: I pay a lot of tax, have no children in school, and make no demands on my government other than to keep me safe, keep the streets in repair, and be efficient in their use of my tax dollars (none of which SB is doing very well). Point being that I'm a net contributor to the pot - you need more like me, not fewer.
You want ideas? Here's just a few:
1. Modify Prop 13 so that business properties are not included and eliminate the provision that lets people inherit their parents' home and inherit their parent's tax basis as well.
2. Eliminate free health care and free education for illegal immigrants.
3. Change the law that makes the babies of illegal immigrants US citizens thus eliminating the incentive for illegals to come here and have "anchor babies".
4. Redistrict the state to eliminate gerrymandered congressional districts.
5. Lose the illusion that taxing the "rich" is the answer and raise taxes on the middle class (of which I am one) by a small amount. There are 144,000 so-called "rich" people (I'm not one of them) paying 50% of all state income tax in a state with a population of 38,000,000 people. These people can and do leave the state. A small payment from 38 million people would make an enormous difference in the state's, and therefore, the county and city budget.
6. Do not allow government employees to vote for the intermediaries that pay them (i.e. city workers can't vote for city council members).
7. Do not allow government employee unions to contribute to political campaigns.
I've got more. But first let's hear some of yours. If you have any. I don't want to hear from you what you think is wrong with my ideas. I want to hear YOUR ideas. If you have any.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
February 15, 2010 at 5:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)
How ironic that the most (nominally) liberal state in the country is the one in which the working class have the hardest time surviving.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
February 15, 2010 at 11:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)
How ironic that the most (nominally) liberal state in the country is the one in which the working class have the hardest time surviving.
You're assuming that the working class is liberal. They're the ones paying the bills, they're too busy to be liberal, which usually involves transferring $ to others.
Carpreader (anonymous profile)
February 15, 2010 at 11:49 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Let me help you out Carpreader. What BC said was that the state is liberal not that the working class is liberal. And here's Basic Commerce 101: When you buy something it actually involves transferring money. Amazing huh? And we all pay bills...what's your point? Daniel Petry
jcrdan (anonymous profile)
February 16, 2010 at 7:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)
JohnLocke - those are some of the best ideas I have seen. I always enjoy reading your posts. Well thought out. Bravo. Daniel Petry
BTW. Baghdad Bob (SezMe) is usually just whining rather than contributing.
jcrdan (anonymous profile)
February 16, 2010 at 7:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Thanks. Seems pointless at times, but I do try to counter some of the silliness and whining with actual thought and an attempt at serious debate...
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
February 16, 2010 at 3:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Carpreader: I'm not assuming anything about the working class themselves, I am commenting on the irony of the disconnect betweent the politicians that run this state and the well being of the people themselves.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
February 17, 2010 at 7:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
hey guys I'm not worried, Meg Whitman will save all of us, just like Arnie saved us, right?
chuckUfarley (anonymous profile)
February 18, 2010 at 9:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Well said, billclausen.
JohnLocke (anonymous profile)
February 18, 2010 at 10:13 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"hey guys I'm not worried, Meg Whitman will save all of us, just like Arnie saved us, right? "
Chuck: I thought it was the job of the president to save us.
billclausen (anonymous profile)
February 19, 2010 at 12:01 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Surf's been fantastic, who cares about this other stuff, don't like it here? move, can't make it here? move. Nothing same, ever!!
lordleadbetter (anonymous profile)
February 22, 2010 at 8:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)