Social Skills Gone Awry
Rude New World
Friday, February 19, 2010
We are the generation of digital multitasking. If we are not Google-ing, we are Facebook stalking, bbm-ing, texting, talking on the iPhone, writing a paper, tweeting, or (the most recent techno pastime) Chatroulette-ing. You name it, we can do it all at once. But is all this technology screwing with our day-to-day communication skills?
Alexandra Markus
Last week I was introduced to the latest trend in virtual communicating: Chatroulette. I can’t tell if I love it, hate it, or think it’s creepy, but as of late I’ve been addicted to it.
Chatroulette.com is remarkable site, connecting random strangers all over the world in a one-on-one online video chat room. To play this Internet version of “Next” all you need is a computer and a webcam. The site is simple: It sets you up with a video-chat partner at random and at any time. You can stay with a given cohort and chat it up, or, if you don’t like who or sometimes what you see, just click “next.”
As my roommate and I shopped around on Chatroulette, we met men, women, animals, and plenty of inanimate objects, but mostly we met college students who were bored or procrastinating. One of our first chat “partners” was an 18-year-old college student who seemed particularly and pleasantly normal compared to the goat with whom we had previously been chatting. And, explicit material and strange faces in black light notwithstanding, the majority of Chatroulette participants are just average, everyday college students. After all, we are the generation of constant virtual entertainment, so it’s hardly surprising that our age group makes up the majority on Chatroulette—or is it?
With all that college students have to plan for, with all the opportunities we are given, and all of the places we have yet to see, why spend all of our time looking at a screen?
I left Chatroulette at home and went to class only to be bothered by one of the most uncomfortable social situations I have experienced while living in Isla Vista. Arriving a few minutes early, I walked into the classroom as a few students from the previous class were still meandering out. When I sat down, one guy who was just about to leave looked over in my direction and said, “You look good.” I wondered aloud, “Do I know you?” Naturally, the guy responded by asking me if I believed in God, then Jesus, and as I became more uncomfortable he crept closer and interrogated, “Why are these questions so difficult for you to answer?”
With what little politeness I could summon, I told him a) I have a boyfriend, b) mind your own business, and c) look up “social skills” in the dictionary.
To abruptly quiz some random stranger about their religious views probably seems normal to many of the online generation. Internet dating Web sites cut out the middleman—also known as courtship—and simply cut to the chase. Fill out a series of questions — I’m sure my friend would have a chance to put down his religious preferences — and within a few moments lists of prospective love interests pop up on the computer screen! Perhaps I was too hasty in assuming that this student’s interrogation was a preamble to asking me out on a date. But with millions of lonely men and women finding love in cyberspace, it’s no wonder people are transferring machine-like manners to their real-world relationships.
Electronic communication tends to impersonalize our daily lives. It takes away from the integrity of keeping dates, being on time, apologizing to or thanking someone. Even texting: I would much rather cancel on someone through text than by a phone call or in person. What is the consequence to ditching a date through text — they don’t respond? In the same calloused vein, Chatroulette makes it easy to be rude—or just strange.
“Want to do a little Chatroulette to get this party started?” my roommate asked the other night. Our favorite thing to shout when we see a creep or simply get bored of the partner is to shout “See you never!” But will we never see these people again—or are these random strangers closer than we realize to being our social circle? According to the popular “six degrees of separation” idea, and online group, everyone is just six steps away from any other person on the planet. (Someone you know is one step away from you; everyone they know is two steps away from you, and so on.)
I always thought online dating was designed for older people with dwindling social crowds and narrower interests. College students have endless interests and opportunities to meet a match. Are we so incapable of simply speaking in person to someone with common interests—or is the Internet our common interest?
The Brad Paisley song “Online” talks about how he’s so much cooler in cyberspace. “Cause even on a slow day I could have a three-way,” he sings. “Chat with two women at one time.” But it’s all smoke and mirrors. Anyone can be anyone. While I’d shrivel up and die without technology, I prefer to be better in person. Keep it real, I.V.!
Related Links
Comments
That's the creepiest site. Shouldn't even have been mentioned.
ahem (anonymous profile)
February 20, 2010 at 3:02 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Social retards are everywhere in many forms & technology has become a conduit for socially retarded behavior & mannerisms.
Times have changed & w/ that so have the methods of communicating. We now have e-mail, IM, facebook, myspace, chat rooms, forums, etc. Let's NOT even go into t.v.
I just attended the Isla Vista reunion 2010 up in San Francisco, which was all put together on facebook (check out the "Isla Vista Reunion 2010" page for some funny pictures!).
Out of the whole 200-300 people that attended I'm still the only 1 that lives in I.V. & the questions where many.
The typical question I got was how people are now as opposed to when all in attendance to that fun event were here.
The biggest difference that I notice from then & now is that then if we wanted to meet up w/ someone we'd either call on the phone or just show up, usually w/ some beer & it was all good. We had skateboard ramps on just about every block, people played in bands, we actually interacted, parties weren't all about getting so wasted that you couldn't make it home.
These days it's all about texting or twittering, more of a declaration of what "YOU" are doing rather than what "WE" could be doing. Discusion has turned to soundbites. Gone are pluralistic activities for more singular such as beer pong. Let's not even get into x-box or playstation. Not many bands these days, mostly wannabe techno dj's that a computer does the work for. There doesn't seem to be much real interaction.
Nothing wrong w/ technology, but when you start to rely on it to do everything for you, the bar gets lowered. Idiocracy, here we come!
I love being an old guy that can run circles around MANY of my 1/2 younger counterparts in many activities.
Sure, I blog, sure, I chat on fb, sure, I go on forums. But the brunt of my day isn't spent on these things. The rain is over for now, sun is out, my roadbike is calling, the wife is going for a run. Enough time on here, out to enjoy IV & NOT be a social retard :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
February 20, 2010 at 10:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Second hand cell phone conversation is like second hand smoke. They are both intrusive and invasive.
Bird (anonymous profile)
February 20, 2010 at 3:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I always look forward to articles from this writer! She made some great points!
To reply to "ahem's" comment, don't get defensive because you are on that site 24/7
loveturtles7 (anonymous profile)
February 20, 2010 at 7 p.m. (Suggest removal)
loveturtles7, you'd be mistaken. I never heard of the site until I saw it here, and then visited for the first and last time. Perhaps you presume other share your lack of taste.
ahem (anonymous profile)
February 20, 2010 at 9:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Another great article by a great columnist. She described chatroulette perfectly. Having been on the site before i completely understand were she is coming from. The internet in all its forms has removed the personal aspects from our life. However i cant help but wonder were people saying the same thing when Edison invented the telephone? Are we just complaining about what will soon become the accepted norm? I think not. Mass communication including facebook, myspace ect. have taking the individual out of the equation and our voices and opinions must now be articulated through the masses. And are the masses not ass's? Thats for you to decide. Great article!
heavyhorse6745 (anonymous profile)
February 20, 2010 at 9:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Thomas A. Edison didn't invent the telephone, it was Alexander G. Bell. What Edison invented the lightbulb :) henry
hank (anonymous profile)
February 24, 2010 at 3:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)