Like the many homes destroyed and neighborhoods devastated during the disastrous Jesusita Fire, the Santa Barbara Botanic Garden was hard hit by the May 2009 foothill wildfire, with 60 of its 78 acres getting scorched, including the total toppling of the historic — albeit already-in-bad-shape — Gane House. Though the burned bushes, dead trees, and iconic structures may never be as they once were, the $6.8 million in insurance money that was awarded this week will certainly go a long way to helping the garden recover.
“We’re very thrilled,” said garden spokesperson Nancy Johnson. “It’s really a wonderful step forward for us to regain our footing and move the garden forward again.” Among other projects, the money will be spent on finishing the home demonstration garden deck and completing the plans to rebuild the Campbell Bridge, the Gane House, the director’s residence, and the lath house.
Johnson explained that the amount was settled upon following “successful and amiable negotiations” with the garden’s insurer, Chubb. “The garden did a tremendous amount of work inventorying what was loss and evaluating what that loss constituted,” said Johnson. “We feel that we did a very good job on that part and that Chubb honored what our assessments were.”
The insurance payment comes amidst the garden’s pursuit of the “Vital Mission Plan,” a controversial development project that has neighbors and others in the community up-in-arms. Some believe that the costs of that plan were, in part, related to the laying off of some popular and longtime staff members last spring, and those critics are already asking that the insurance money be used to hire back some of those people. But while there is “some flexibility” with what the garden does with the money, Johnson said it cannot be used for staffing. “We have to use it on the loss, the physical loss,” she explained.
In the meantime, Johnson and outgoing director Edward Schneider are encouraging the community to visit the garden, as they both predict that there will be a shower of wildflowers in the weeks to come.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Too bad they are wasting so much money on slick TV commercials and lawyers instead of using it to rebuild the Garden and credibility with the community and volunteers.
The way the Botanic Garden is wasting money, it would be hard to contribute to their efforts.
Richard_Saunders (anonymous profile)
February 27, 2010 at 8:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Richard, I feel that the money being spent on "TV commercials and lawyers" is a necessity to ensure that the truth about the Vital Mission Plan gets out there. There are many false rumors going around and the Garden has decided to spend money to make sure the truth is heard. The Garden will remain 99% open space, the events will be limited in size, and the new improvements will only serve to provide the community with a better Garden. The SBBG is only looking to improve its specimen preservation as well as its accessibility to everyone. So although some money is not going directly to the Garden, these are necessary costs that the Garden needs to utilize.
GauchoScott (anonymous profile)
March 1, 2010 at 11:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Gaucho - Can you tell us how much the Garden is spending for TV commercials, lawyers and other expenses to promote the Vital Mission Plan? I heard it was over $1 million. Is that true?
zorro (anonymous profile)
March 2, 2010 at 1:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I won't pretend to know how much the garden has spent on positive publicity for the VMP, but in all honesty, why does it even matter?
The garden and it's efforts to accurately explain the VMP to the public are privately funded. And furthermore, if the opposition to the VMP wasn't falsely describing the goal of the VMP, then as much money would not have to be spent on positive publicity and correcting inaccurate rumors.
The publicity seems to be necessary for the garden to get what it needs, so I don't see why it is money ill-spent. The VMP is truly essential, I can see why the garden is fighting hard to get what it needs.
nginther (anonymous profile)
March 2, 2010 at 3:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)
No plan is so vital it can't be changed. While airconditioned classrooms and a few "stroller/walker" paths would be appreciated, why hasn't the Botanic Garden management group talked about all the PLANTS it should be replacing after the fire? Or may a few bucks towards a fire break, or evacuation plan?
mommacat1 (anonymous profile)
March 3, 2010 at 6:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)
They are doing and have done something about it --- to wit, "are encouraging the community to visit the garden, as they both predict that there will be a shower of wildflowers in the weeks to come."
tabatha (anonymous profile)
March 3, 2010 at 11:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)