Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Facebook
Twitter
Google+1
del.icio.us.
Digg!
Yahoo! Buzz
Diigo
google
newsvine
reddit
technorati
Yahoo!
MyspaceFor all those who have a tough time negotiating Santa Barbara’s streets on feet — or on two wheels instead of four — pending legislation may offer some relief. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which was altered by the State Senate’s 2007 greenhouse-gas related bill (SB 97), hopes to amplify its efforts in making California’s roads as friendly for pedestrians and bicyclists as they are for drivers.
At the most basic level, CEQA is responsible for assessing whether or not proposed transportation development projects — such as new road construction — are environmentally conscious, a process that involves drafting an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). On December 31, however, suggested changes to CEQA’s parameters were sent from the California Natural Resources Agency to the Office of Administrative Law for further review. Should the changes to CEQA be approved, they would go on to be included in the California Code of Regulations.
As with all pending legislation, some of the suggested CEQA changes are controversial, namely the “level of service” issues. “Level of service” measures a roadway’s ability to service the drivers, bicyclists, and pedestrians who rely on it using a scale from A to F, with A signifying easy travel and F meaning heavy traffic congestion. Because California’s roadways are notoriously laden with cars, CEQA is pushing for more bicyclist- and pedestrian-friendly roadways. The detailed list of proposed changes can be found at ceres.ca.gov/ceqa/guidelines.
Although the legislation would affect the state as a whole, it has garnered heavy support among Santa Barbara residents, as well as those in San Jose and from San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom. According to Santa Barbara Bicycle Coalition president Ralph Fertig, it is about time non-drivers be granted equal roadway rights. “This is a beneficial change where automotive traffic will no longer be considered the sole concern of future projects,” Fertig said.
Because the changes are still under review, it remains unclear when they would go into effect should they be approved. However, added Fertig, supporters are optimistic.
Previous Month
Comments
Interesting article. Perhaps it is an editing mistake, but the article has some facts mixed up.
CEQA was not born in 2007 from SB97. CEQA was adopted in 1970. Part of the political impetus for it's origins lay in the 1969 Santa Barbara Oil Spill and the birth of the modern American environmental movement.
SB97 which addressed green house gas emissions was adopted in 2007. The referenced changes are to implement SB97 by amending the state CEQA Guidelines. SB97 was part of a progression of global warming legislation including AB32, SB375, and Executive Order S-3-05.
A full explanation entitled, 'Amendments to the State CEQA Guidelines - Addressing Analysis and Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Pursuant to SB97,' can be found at:
http://ceres.ca.gov/ceqa/docs/Final_S...
From the California Natural Resources Agency:
"The impetus for CEQA can be traced to the passage of the first federal environmental protection statute in 1969, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). In response to this federal law, the California State Assembly created the Assembly Select Committee on Environmental Quality to study the possibility of supplementing NEPA through state law. This legislative committee, in 1970, issued a report entitled The Environmental Bill of Rights, which called for a California counterpart to NEPA. Later that same year, acting on the recommendations of the select committee, the legislature passed, and Governor Reagan signed, the CEQA statute."
TerryLeftgoff (anonymous profile)
January 11, 2010 at 1:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Thanks for bringing that to our attention, Terry. We've changed to article to reflect the correct information.
Tyler (Tyler Hayden)
January 12, 2010 at 1:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)