Citing “the uncertainty of her health” in an internal memo to office staff and a public press release Monday, acting District Attorney Joshua Lynn said DA Christie Stanley will be retiring from her position within two weeks.
Stanley has been battling lung cancer since practically the beginning of her term in 2007 and recently took a leave of absence, naming Lynn as the acting DA. Not long before that, she announced she would not be seeking reelection and endorsed Lynn to face off against Senior Deputy DA Joyce Dudley, who had announced weeks early her candidacy for the office.
Stanley, who graduated from the Ventura College of Law, has been with the district attorney’s office since 1980, after two years of practicing civil law. She is well-regarded by her colleagues, many of whom say she never really got a chance to lead the office because of her illness. She was one of the first women to work in the Santa Barbara DA’s office and the first woman elected District Attorney in Santa Barbara County, having received almost 70 percent of the vote as one of three candidates in 2006. Her most recent public appearance was last March, when she was honored by State Sen. Tony Strickland as his district’s Woman of the Year.
Paul Wellman (file)
Last March, State Senator Tony Strickland (right) presented Santa Barbara District Attorney Christie Stanley with the California 19th District Woman of the Year award.
It appears the decision on what to do about a replacement for Stanley will be up to the board of supervisors, though the specifics on their potential decision remain unclear. According to the Government Code, the board of supervisors “shall fill by appointment all vacancies” that occur in elected offices, except for the supervisors and judges. “The appointee shall hold office for the unexpired term or until the first Monday after January 1 succeeding the next general election,” the code reads.
County Counsel Dennis Marshall said his office has not completed a legal review of the situation. Lynn said his interpretation of the code gives the option for the board to either appoint someone immediately, or wait until the voters have spoken at the June primary and then appoint the winner to the DA position until officially sworn-in at the beginning of 2011.
Dudley, however, said that because no time frame is given in the code, an appointment should be made right away or in a time frame “reasonable under the circumstances.” Her greatest concern, she said, is that the best and most-qualified person should be sitting in that seat, citing a “lack of leadership” in the office over the last several months.
Lynn responded bluntly stating that “there is no lack of leadership in this office,” and that it was important to keep continuity in the administrative part of the office as the county heads toward budget sessions this summer. Lynn took up the duties of acting District Attorney after Stanley had to have surgery on her hip in October, though he indicated at the time he expected her to return. Stanley’s selection of Lynn was allowed by the Government Code, which indicates she had the power to name him acting DA. Lynn was at the time the chief trial deputy in the DA’s South Coast office, a position he had held since 2008. He was chosen as acting DA, he said, because of the recent retirement of North County assistant DA Gene Martinez, and the upcoming (and now passed) retirement of South County assistant DA Eric Hanson.
While at least a couple of supervisors were waiting for legal advice on how to proceed from County Counsel, the item hasn’t been placed on the supervisor’s closed session agenda — where the board generally discusses personnel issues and most likely will take up this issue — for tomorrow’s meeting, and 1st District Supervisor Salud Carbajal is out of town right now as well. Dudley has secured the endorsement of 3rd District Supervisor Doreen Farr and Carbajal, while the other three supervisors have not publicly endorsed either candidate, leaving it up to anyone’s guess what may happen in the weeks ahead.



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Another crock of political intrigue with Deputy DA's jockeying and being jockeyed for political advantage over each other. Dudley is clearly the more qualified on every important measure, but somewhere a snub or snipe has led to this unseemly palace infighting. Nature --and politics-- abhor a vaccuum.
60Hotel (anonymous profile)
January 25, 2010 at 8:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Not so fast "60 Hotel." while Mrs. Stanley made the decision who she thought was the most qualified to lead the office before she retired. It seems to me that the voters should be the ones to make the judgement about who is most qualified to hold an elected position. From my understanding, Mr. Lynn has been doing an admiral job, why cause another upheavel in an office just a few months before the election. Why waste the effort and resources he has aleady committed to developing the all important budget. Let Mr Lynn do the Job Mrs. Stanley entrusted in him and then let the voters decide. It is the least we can do for Mrs. Stanley, the employees of the office and the citizens of Santa Barbara County.
jnalls (anonymous profile)
January 25, 2010 at 10:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)
@jnalls...becasue it's not up to Mrs. Stanley and never was. What she did was unprecedented and perhaps fraudulent. The BOS are the only ones legally responsible for making the determination about who is best suited to take the place in the event of a vacancy in this elected office...and it has been vacant for many months. What I would say is in the best interest of the residents of Santa Barbara County is that they are confident that for the next year the person at the helm of the DA's office is capable and qualified, not just a political appointment of Stanley's. If you remember her endorsement came one the heels of his "appointment" as her successor. So who better to make that choice than 5 folks who have been elected into office to make these decision on our behalf or the last wishes of a very ill woman to pass on her legacy to her lap dog?
goletaslew (anonymous profile)
January 25, 2010 at 10:47 p.m. (Suggest removal)
A candidate's interim appointment to the job is not necessarily an advantage.
juel1110 (anonymous profile)
January 26, 2010 at 6:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Joyce Dudley is the best choice for the next DA
InTheKnow (anonymous profile)
January 26, 2010 at 10:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Mr. Lynn was chosen to be chief trial deputy in a competitive process. According to law, when Mrs. Stanley became ill, she had to appoint the next person in line of authority to act for in her absence. Mr. Hanson did not take the position because he planned to retire - and he did. There were many sour grapes over Lynn's appointment as chief deputy - including Dudley and her major supporters. Mr. Lynn is not responsible for Mrs. Stanley's decisions regarding her absence or retirement - regardless of your thoughts on that issue, placing blame on Lynn is wrong.
Lynn has done a terrific job in a stressful time; fighting the Board of Supervisors that wants to cut the budget by 2/3 -- while dealing with the retirement of an entire generation of senior deputies. He is honest and direct, he means what he says - and he doesn't kiss up to anyone.
So, you think the BOS should "annoint" Dudley ? Why? What has she done to demonstrate any qualifications? Run an office? Negotiate a budget? Prosecuted gang cases, murder, anything other than sex cases? But she has written two novels!
Perhaps - could it be that Dudley has cut a deal with the BOS that she will accept those budget cuts without complaint - so long as they deliver on her appointment or "annointment". Wise up people, this is politics. When you sell out, you owe big -- and Dudley is going to owe big. The question is: who is going to pay?
We all are. Goodbye 15 more prosecutors, hello gang violence, street crime, DUI deaths, burglary, auto-theft .. and every public safety nightmare you can imagine.
Enough drama - let the people vote in June and leave the Board of Supervisors to mess up something else.
ThinkForAChange (anonymous profile)
January 26, 2010 at 6 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Let the voters decide... Not Ms. Stanley... I am sure Mr. Lynn is well qualified, but I am strongly behind Ms. Dudley.
Trying2 (anonymous profile)
January 27, 2010 at 8:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)
This job has belonged to Tom Sneddon, his protege Stanley, and her protege Lynn, too long.
It's time for a change.
The Board of Supes should appoint someone interim and then the voters should decide. The campaign should be about how the new DA would be DIFFERENT from the Sneddon/Stanley regimes. Lynn would have some 'splainin' to do.
infomaniac (anonymous profile)
January 27, 2010 at 9:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)
ThinkForAChange,
The DA has very little effect on the crime rate. They have an effect on the prosecution of people but not the crime rate. Your worse case scenario and scare tactics is typical of the type of person that we don't want at the top spot in the DA's office.
Who are you in favor of? It sounds like you have some close connections to that person, not the person I want there.
InTheKnow (anonymous profile)
January 27, 2010 at 9:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Endorsing someone who works in your office is very risky and takes a lot of conviction. Look at joshualynnforda.com and dudley4da.com. Look at the current attorneys and investigators and who they endorse. I think you will find that Lynn is far better respected in the office. These are not union people or an organization - just individuals who are taking a risk to show the public how the inside of the office feels.
concernedvalleyguy (anonymous profile)
January 27, 2010 at 8:58 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Now I really want a Dudley sign to display at home!!!
David_Pritchett (David Pritchett)
January 29, 2010 at 8:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)