It’s 11:30 on a Thursday morning. I’m sitting at a worn, round table next to the stairs in the Santa Barbara Public Library. I just came from outside, where I was having an impromptu conversation with Kenny the hobo from Hell’s Kitchen, New York. You see, while I am employable as a finish carpenter, I am currently without work. That’s what affords me this supposed luxury of free time. What do I do with my increasingly familiar freedom? I hang out with friends who, intentionally or not, have made a career out of this.
Kenny’s been living on the street for a long time, 15 years plus. He’s an interesting character, to which his black Crocodile Dundee hat and creaking Manhattan accent by themselves attest. He’s got a rather original perspective on this American life as well.
Kenny never asks nothing from nobody. He doesn’t fly a sign, he doesn’t go to the Rescue Mission or the “Starvation” Army. He collects items for recycling, cans and bottles mostly. And by 11 a.m. he’s got a 50-pound bag going.
Kenny’s perspective comes largely out of an upbringing that taught him three rules: a man’s got to feed himself, clothe himself, and shelter himself. Everything else is optional.
But he doesn’t see too many people living by such rules in this country, and especially not in Santa Barbara. “Paradise for parasites,” he calls it. Parasites survive by attaching themselves to a host and sucking nearly all the life out of it, Kenny explains. From the homeless community to mainstream society, we do this too: In a legitimate realization of our seemingly hopeless situations, we attach ourselves to people and organizations that we hope will stay afloat as we are drowning. Like the Salvation Army and kind college students offering meals to the poor in the park. Like friends and family who are better off than us. Like the government. All exist in large part to bail us out.
This is not to say that such generous people and organizations should stop their actions and let people starve. Not at all. Everyone needs a hand from time to time.
But not as a way of life, Kenny says. The problem is that as a society and as individuals we have not learned to be responsible.
In Shopclass as Soulcraft: An Inquiry Into the Value of Work, Matthew Crawford observes the disconnect between individual responsibility and work. He sees an increasing stultification of “knowledge workers” (i.e. those who have gone to college and who fill the socially idealized jobs that are supposedly based on knowledge and education rather than tangible skills) in workplaces that are more concerned with personal characteristics than with accomplished goals. In such workplaces, people are more focused on maintaining their employment and moving up the social ladder through face-saving ambiguity than in getting real work done. ”One’s career depends entirely on these personal relationships [with hierarchical authority], in part because the criteria of evaluation are ambiguous,” Crawford writes. This given, much of these workers’ jobs consist of “constant interpretation and reinterpretation of events that constructs a reality in which it is difficult to pin blame on anyone, especially oneself,” according to sociologist Craig Calhoun, as quoted by Crawford. In ambiguous work with ambiguous standards, we dodge responsibility and the possibility of our careers being jeopardized. For a simpler and more comical example, watch any episode of The Office. It’s funny because it’s true.
Crawford’s argument comes out of a larger argument for the value of the manual trades, jobs often believed to be unworthy of college graduates. I know this well, as I have received plenty of disappointed and surprised looks, even laughs, when I tell people I work construction. (Slightly more interest and less pity is expressed if I say I’m a carpenter, but then all the Jesus jokes come out.) Crawford points to manual trades as a positive example of responsibility in the workplace because of objective standards that must be met, rather than social BS for the sake of upward mobility. People can check to see if the jamb I just set is plumb and square. You can’t BS crown-moulding like you can BS an academic essay.
School, unfortunately, trains us to be masters of the refined art of bullshitting. The dismaying reality is that students become more concerned with the grade than with knowledge, and with real accomplishment. The grade becomes the accomplishment. Ideally the grade is an objective symbol of competency, but anyone who has spent any time in academia knows this routinely breaks down.
We choose whether or not we learn. But the massive pressure to excel beyond our peers, to be competitive in college or graduate school, has far less to do with actual knowledge and skill than it does with grade point averages, honor society memberships, and letters of recommendation. This is how the system works, we believe; we have to play the game, we have to jump through these hoops to get to the ideal career. But graduate from college and you quickly realize that you’ve been deluded for a long time. Those ideal careers aren’t out here just waiting for grads racing across the finish line, degree in hand.
The same kind of learned irresponsibility exists in both the workplace and school. But there’s an awkward chasm between the two, which leaves us at a complete loss. And the insanity doesn’t end if we manage to bridge the gap, because we are still a society which spends and consumes way beyond its means without a thought to the systems and people we are sucking dry. Like parasites.
Westmont.edu
Westmont’s 2007 graduation


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Well said Peter. I followed the path you are on now, getting a degree in liberal arts ('82) and going in to construction work. It's worked out great. There is definitely more security in depending on yourself than in depending on others for your livelihood.
Check out Randy Alcorns' column in the Daily Sound yesterday. It discusses some of these same ideas.
JHL (anonymous profile)
July 14, 2010 at 7:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Wonderfully insightful. Seminar like discussions of this nature and subject should be manditory for HS seniors and college freshmen (along with personal finance education). The dismissive attitude of the ivory tower set is exactly why so many of american jobs have been shipped over seas. The quest for profits at the expense of all other considerstions. Short sighted and devasting for our economy and the future welfare of our children.
sa1 (anonymous profile)
July 14, 2010 at 9:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Well-said! It's true that in early 21st cent. America there's a hideous over-emphasis on 'knowledge' jobs, white collar work, pushing paper, and Shopclass to Soulcraft is a terrific analysis.
But when you write, "In a legitimate realization of our seemingly hopeless situations, we attach ourselves to people and organizations that we hope will stay afloat as we are drowning. Like the Salvation Army and kind college students offering meals to the poor in the park. Like friends and family who are better off than us. Like the government. All exist in large part to bail us out." -- well, humans are social creatures and we always expect our 'group' to help us survive. It is obviously wrong and selfish if some citizens start thinking "the government OWES me money or something," and that could be an excess of a hypothetical socialism.
At another place, Peter, you write about "we are still a society which spends and consumes way beyond its means without a thought to the systems and people we are sucking dry." So maybe the bigger issue isn't over-educated "knowledge workers" but the rapacious consumerism this relatively unregulated CAPITALIST economy fosters?
Lastly, I wonder if there is literally enough of your hands-on "real" work out there in a nation of 310 million humans? If not "knowledge workers," pundits, politicians, and medical doctors how do we employ folks in a meaningful and productive way?? Population control is the only answer....
DrDan (anonymous profile)
July 14, 2010 at 10:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Kenny gets a monthly check from the VA. Ask Officer Casey about him.
ChrisG (anonymous profile)
July 14, 2010 at 11:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)
You mean to tell me that a degree in Womens Studies, Chicano Studies, other useless degrees does nothing more than getting you a job in government?
I'm SHOCKED. Well at least you think correctly.
jukin (anonymous profile)
July 14, 2010 at 11:51 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Jukin,
What do you do for a living?
Kingprawn (anonymous profile)
July 14, 2010 at 1:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Jukin,
Nevermind. I found the answer in your comment archives.
Kingprawn (anonymous profile)
July 14, 2010 at 1:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I remember thinking many of the same things after I graduated Westmont with a degree in Religious Studies. I would argue that the inherent problem isn't so much the work that people do or the goals they set, but rather the kind of value that is placed on what we do. Ultimately, the value of construction work (personally and socially) is just as important as social work (if not more so), but the people around us tend to associate certain jobs with certain achievements and social standing (kind of the same idea as “the guy driving the Mercedes must be rich”). Fortunately, this "value" probably isn't really what is important (I think you make that point expertly). The value of a career is that we can find a balance between what we are doing, what we want to do, and what we are expected to do; and then finding contentment with that balance. It sounds like Kenny has found that. That may sound like foolish psycho-babble to some, but the alternative is to either live blindly in the social picture painted above or to live a life driven by hopelessness and anger. I think in the latter case one is probably just as blind.
Num1UofAn (anonymous profile)
July 14, 2010 at 2:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Perhaps if Peter had not gotten such an utterly useless degree as "Religious Studies" ,whatever that is, he might not be so dismissive of a college education. He could have gotten a degree in accounting and gotten a job ASAP. I shouldn't say "useless", just not useful towards getting a paying job. I also think the writer greatly overstates the "disappointment" of most folks upon learning he is a construction worker. I think he is manifesting a sort of reverse snobbism. These days a paying job is fairly impressive college degree or no college degree and most folks are well aware of that and have been for some time now.
Noletaman (anonymous profile)
July 15, 2010 at 4:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)
@ Noletaman - I think you fell right in the trap he was laying.
Num1UofAn (anonymous profile)
July 15, 2010 at 8:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Before Reagan even the most mediocre artist could survive in this country. Need I say more?
EZK (anonymous profile)
July 15, 2010 at 9:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The problem is that there are too many colleges and universities and everybody who applies gets in somewhere. Liberal arts educations should only be for very bright and motivated students who really want to learn, not just graduate.
Everybody else should go to trade schools that practically ensure decent employment.
Your nurse friend should go to a city where there's a nursing shortage in order to find a job and build the resume she needs to find employment back home.
Lars (anonymous profile)
July 16, 2010 at 10:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)
This links to a video that 11 minutes long, and more about Labor vs. Capital/Finance, than involving education directly, but the themes overlap a bit: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOP2V_...
equus_posteriori (anonymous profile)
July 17, 2010 at 8:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Lars had a good point, the one I've struggled with through my time in college. The abundance of colleges and the emphasis on having a degree (rather than gaining knowledge) is part of what creates this system. An education gives us knowledge which nourishes our minds, a trade gives us the means by which to nourish our bodies. Sometimes we can find a career that also nourishes our minds. However, the expectation that this should be the motivation to rush through a degree so you can sit in an office and pretend to do work while checking Facebook--there's no real justification for that.
ringsroses (anonymous profile)
July 17, 2010 at 5:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)
So true, I have a friend who graduated from there-he works at Trader Joe's.
msmelody1 (anonymous profile)
July 20, 2010 at 10:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Why are not students thinking about how they can support themshelves when deciding what degree they should pursue?
What is wrong with this picture -- going to a school that cost 40k a year to get a 25k year job?
If the student actually had to pay for college instead of cal grants, fed grants, mom and dad and other hand outs would their choices be different?
loneranger (anonymous profile)
July 20, 2010 at 8:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Loneranger,
Of course their choices would be different. Less people would be able to afford to attend institutions of higher education.
In most cases, however, there is an inverse relationship between education and poverty.
Kingprawn (anonymous profile)
July 21, 2010 at 4:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Love this article, and articles like this are the reason I love the Independent. Thank you for your excellent work.
LV (anonymous profile)
July 22, 2010 at 4:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Indeed, our society does value some occupations over others for better or for worse. I am encouraged that the author has the thoughtfulness to understand these concepts and I'm sure will (perhaps later rather than sooner) find a calling that can fulfill his intellectual, social as well as material needs.
Unfortunately, we are also the society that values "the Karshadians". So, I am not real confident that the majority of our society will figure and work it out like Peter will.
hutch (anonymous profile)
July 25, 2010 at 3:49 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I suspect Peter and I might get along famously if we were to ever meet over a cup of joe. And I think his writing style is more persuasive than most. But on second read, I cannot help but think that his letter is chock full of stereotypes and unsupported opinions stated as fact. And dangerously so.
Lines that come across as observations are really only opinion gained from reading a book or watching a television show - not first hand experience. Remember, the author graduated in 2007 and doesn't have much experience (as far as we know) in the workplace environments he attempts to characterize. And he has only attended one college (Westmont). Can his claims about other students at other colleges and universities be applicable? I don't think so.
In reviewing the reader comments, its interesting to see the variety of responses - they range anywhere from anti-intellectualism to thoughts on skills valued by society. My personal take on how well you'll do in life, no matter how you attempt to quantify it, is its highly dependent on the individual's abilities, values, and work ethic. But education and a little bit of luck go a long way to help.
EastBeach (anonymous profile)
July 25, 2010 at 6:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Kenny is very enterprising, but once placed in the blue bins those recyclables belong to the government as part of the waste management stream of custody.
The revenue from selling the recyclables on the wholesale market is part of the budgeting for the solid waste management programs, meaning that everyone else who pays a refuse bill is paying a bit more because the revenue to the program is diminished by people stealing from the blue bins or public recycling containers.
As for the apparent paradox of being well- or over-educated and thus unemployed, one should learn how to dumb-down one's resume.
David_Pritchett (David Pritchett)
August 18, 2010 at 9:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)