In a letter sent to elected officials last week, Ernie Salomon — a longtime and highly visible producer for public access station The Santa Barbara Channels — called for the resignation of board director Ted Baer.
Salomon — in addition to questioning why no one on the board is either a staff member or producer — criticized Baer for micromanaging, including the attempted dismissal of executive producer Keri Stokstad. In a terse letter to city officials, Baer responded he was “not at liberty to discuss” personnel matters and “I only wish [Salomon] had taken the time to find out the truth before sending off one of his diatribes.”
And in the Santa Barbara Channels board room last Thursday, Salomon claimed, “Never have I seen so much dissension in almost fourteen years at the station.”
Several producers and volunteers protested at the board meeting against an agenda item regarding the potential dismissal of Stockstad, which they perceived to be wholly unwarranted. (The board’s executive committee did not meet to set the agenda; it is understood to have been set by Baer.) The board meeting went into a three-hour long closed session, after which members of the public were let back in to be informed that no action was taken.
Channels is a public access TV company, which aims to provide a platform for community debate in Santa Barbara. Keri Stockstad was appointed as Executive Director earlier this year, and has received a lot of praise from the staff working with her. Producer Michael Nicholson told The Independent that Stockstad has “generated a hugely positive atmosphere,” and former Indy staff writer and Channels producer Cathy Murillo added that “producers and staff are fully behind Stockstad.”
However, the Channels’ Board of Directors has lacked confidence in Stockstad from the outset. A Board Executive Director Overseer was appointed to monitor Stockstad’s work, but this overseer subsequently quit. The tenability of Stockstad’s position has been featured on the agenda before, and the result was the same: no action taken.
In her speech to the board, Murillo said that: “I reiterate the need for producer representation on this board of directors.” She believes that the board’s composition — of external directors only — means that it will have difficulty in understanding why internal staff members do things in a certain way. Six new board members have been appointed in the last month, but applications from producers William Smithers and Murillo were turned down.
Other producers also mentioned that the lack of internal representation on the board is a problem. It certainly explains how there can exist such a sharp divergence between the board’s view of certain issues, and that of the staff.
It’s difficult to aggregate stats on how unusual it is to have a Board of Directors with a purely external composition. However, producers Michael Nicholson and Ernie Salomon, who draw on several decades’ worth of experience, affirm it to be extremely unusual.
Santa Barbara city council’s deficit-cutting policy led to a proposal to reduce the funding to the Channels by 30 percent. Keri Stockstad and various producers spoke out at both of the hearings on the issue, and the council decided to only reduce its funding by 15 percent.
Murillo said that Stockstad spoke passionately on the subject, and organized the attempts to secure as much funding for Channels as possible. Staff members at Santa Barbara Channels are now exploring ways that they can recoup their budget short-fall via fundraising initiatives.
Following the board meeting, Producer Ernie Salomon called for the resignation of Board Chair Ted Baer.
As Channels’ funding was recently reduced, Salomon believes that the organization needs to urgently focus on discussing ways to adapt, and to raise more money. He said that it is “really stupid,” to spend a whole board meeting debating the position of an Executive Director, who enjoys the full support of internal staff.
Salomon and other producers highlighted further reasons for their unhappiness. Board directors reportedly only attended the first hearing that the city council held to discuss Channels’ funding. The producers also asserted that board room friction will not help their standing with the council in future discussions over funding.
In response, Baer said in an interview said that public access channels all over the country are experiencing hard times and that Santa Barbara Channels is no different. He asserted that because the council cut the station’s budget — and if the unions don’t make concessions — the budget could suffer even more. The board has to start raising money, he said, which to date, it has not done much of.
As to the allegations that he’s trying to micromanage and fire the current Stockstad, he said, “They don’t know all the facts. They have been misinformed. And I can’t tell you what the facts are because of personnel considerations.” Baer did acknowledge in the three years he’s been on the board, no one has ever called for the resignation of the board’s president. “I guess being the board president, you take the heat,” he said.
Producers at Santa Barbara Channels have started to organize themselves with monthly meetings, and are considering their next course of action.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace






Previous Month



Comments
I've been the Executive Director of a non-profit access corporation similar to the Santa Barbara Channels for 15 years, and know how difficult it is to build up an organization while under siege. Having known Ms. Stokstad for six years through her work with the Alliance for Community Media, I can't understand why the chair of her access corporation isn't one of her biggest supporters. She has always struck me as being a very capable, intelligent, and considerate person, willing to listen to other people's viewpoints and ideas. Despite being new to Santa Barbara, she's been successfully running access centers for a decade or more, and knows what she's doing.
It might better benefit the organization if the board at the Santa Barbara Channels, including the chairman, gave their new Executive Director their full support, and a reasonable amount of time to prove herself and do the job they hired her to do rather than wasting her energy and theirs fighting over leadership at a time when they should be building the best organization they can for the community.
nancyleerichard (anonymous profile)
July 22, 2010 at 2:49 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Mr. Baer fails to realize that it is not his position as board president that is causing "the heat". It is his micro-managing of the channels, his decision to write board meeting agendas without consulting the executive committee, his decision to spend money without the approval of the rest of the board and his behind the scenes scheming that caused this situation in the first place. He is taking the heat because he is the problem. And it is obvious that he is also attempting to stack the board with others he can control rather that elect members that represent the users of the channels.
He has worked in secret to create his power plays and now the cat is out of the bag. The facts are that all of the people that matter support Ms. Stokstad. Mr. Baer needs to truly move in a positive direction or resign and get out of the way so the SB Channels can get back on track.
calibarbarian (anonymous profile)
July 22, 2010 at 6:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)
"Independent" readers who'd like to see and hear Santa Barbara Channels Executive Director Keri Stokstad can view an interview with her at:
http://SB-JustBetweenUs.com
bilwil (anonymous profile)
July 22, 2010 at 8:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)
This wonderful facility is simply being mis-managed.
It is not a comfortable place right now.
Strong management needs strong support.
I don't see either.
Clean house.
The energy should be focused on the creative work.
Not on this energy sucking crap.
I don't see any support for anyone right now at the Channels.
I see fear.
And fear will kill the creative flow,everytime.
gotosantorini (anonymous profile)
July 23, 2010 at 8:28 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Santorini is correct: Fear trumps creativity nearly always.
As a former producer at SB Channels, this situation appears to outsiders as muck enveloped in garbage wrapped in trashtalk.
The obvious: Baer has to GO. Non-creative micro-niggling blabbing heads add absolutely nothing to any creative direction or interest. They only serve to egregiously muck things up, be it Ted Baer or a certain Hillbilly character once played by Max Baer.
The more obvious: Any director who has the unanimous backing of her producers is doing something right. Besides, Keri Stockstad is far better looking and possesses far more charisma in this media of entertainment than Jethro, er, Ted Baer does, rope belt notwithstanding.
Final obviousness of this mess: Baer needs to step down, out, and out of the way forthwith. As in NOW, Ted. Just go. Do it.
Cue audio: "No confidence." Camera pans and pulls back to reveal numerous wooden staffs dropping to floor. Music up. Fade to black.
Draxor (anonymous profile)
July 23, 2010 at 10:01 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The Executive Director was hired in January. Article states: "However, the Channels’ Board of Directors has lacked confidence in Stockstad from the outset."
Why would they have hired her if they didn't think she was going to be great? Surely there is much that has not been / cannot be made public to explain the board's waning confidence.
Note also that at least five board members are brand new, and last week's meeting was their very first. Faced with an agenda item: "Employee discipline/dismissal/release" as the first item to deal with as board members, surely there was prudent reticence on their part to take dramatic action before having a good feel for the organization and her leadership. If older board members have serious doubts, despite the support of staff and producers (that's anyone who wants to have a show on the local access channels), there might be more to the situation than meets the eye.
SB Channels is a wonderful community organization and facility open to all, that is underutilized and in need of funds to continue its mission. All of SB County should rally around to help keep this great voice of the cultural, educational and entertainment people, nonprofits and other organizations alive and well! EDs and board members come and go, but the organization's mission must continue -- healthy, vital and vigorous.
SBC Public Board Documents:
https://sites.google.com/a/sbchannels...
LaFleur (anonymous profile)
July 23, 2010 at 10:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)
This is very sad. Effective nonprofits require leadership boards that understand their roles as policy makers and work as a team to set strategic goals. When they hire an executive director they are giving authority to an executive to run the organization and create/carry out sound structures and procedures to achieve the goals set. How could this possibly be judged in 7 months? Ms. Stokstad has clearly taken strong steps to instill confidence in those she leads (staff) and those the organization must serve (members). And this while also preserving threatened funding. Seems like a remarkable start. If the board leadership empowered and supported her, as a professional executive, to do her job (and they, as a whole, did theirs), Santa Barbara residents would be the winners. Ms. Stokstad brings a very strong community media leadership track record ... but Santa Barbara may never get the benefit of her knowledge and experience if the current board fails to let her lead. What a shame.
BTW...I have been a nonprofit media director and organizational development consultant for over 15 years. I am familiar with Ms. Stokstad's work and fine reputation in our field.
MinervaMom (anonymous profile)
July 23, 2010 at 12:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm so down with what gotosantorini said. I've been over there helping on a show and the people who work there don't seem very happy anymore and they seem confused. That lady don't seem very strong to me. And i haven't been able to get through there on the phone for a long time.
juangarcia (anonymous profile)
July 23, 2010 at 11:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I can't imagine what it has been like for the staff if this has been going on as long as it appears to be. Sounds like even before Ms. Stokstad arrived there were troubles between the previous ed. dir. and Mr. Baer. She must have some length of time in her contract. Let her do her job and see what she has to offer instead of all the drama. If she has staff support and producer support doesn't the board owe her a chance?
I found video of her speaking at the Santa Barbara City Council Meeting:
http://santabarbara.granicus.com/Medi...
She speaks at 42 minutes into the video.
Seems like a strong gal to me.
SBTownie (anonymous profile)
July 24, 2010 at 9:51 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Look, please, at the Sunday afternoon program lineup on our one truly local broadcast channel, KEYT, and you'll see why we need to be increasing funding for community-oriented media outlets like SB Channels rather than cutting it.
KEYT has a license to use public airwaves because of its promise to serve the public. I guess providing a place for flim-flam men to offer gut-busting, ab-building gizmos qualifies in some small respect, but where are the programs that reflect our community, that let us speak out on issues of the day, and that help all the people of the region share their talents and express their concerns? One half hour of nonprofit coverage a week and a threadbare news effort don't constitute public service in my book.
SB Channels, while broadcast only on absentee-owner Cox Communications' cable, also posts many of its programs to the web where anyone with broadband internet access - oops, there go the working poor and unemployed - can also benefit from them. We need a complete media makeover in this community - from broadcast to print to web - and only with experienced, knowledgeable professionals like Keri Stokstad is that going to happen. Of course real change is anathema to the powers that be and that's why boards of directors are usually employed to stifle genuine innovation.
jonkwilliams (anonymous profile)
July 25, 2010 at 12:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
As a 27 year community media professional and the CEO of a community media center, I'm always interested in what is happening at community television centers around the country. The leadership challenges at SB Channels that have been in the news lately sadden me.
I’ve known Keri Stokstad for more than 10 years. Ms. Stokstad has worked in community media for more than 20 years. She built two access centers from the ground up - one in Washington and one in Massachusetts. She is a woman with enormous talent, calm demeanor, professional passion, and high ethical standards. She has exceptional management skills, fully understands the quirky nature and challenges facing community television, and is more than capable of managing the Santa Barbara Channels in a manner that will move the organization forward. I've seen her bring the most diverse groups of people together to find consensus. Her ability to think strategically about how to leverage the light-speed changes in our technology simply awes me. She is politically savvy and fully aware of the critical need for strong relationships with local jurisdictions. She knows how to do her job. Any access center would be fortunate to have her at the helm.
Deborah Vinsel, CEO
Thurston Community Television
Olympia WA
dvinsel (anonymous profile)
July 26, 2010 at 12:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)