A 24-year-old Santa Barbara woman is no longer in custody for the alleged murder of her newborn, pending the outcome of a coroner’s examination on her deceased infant’s body.
Jessie Canfield currently faces no charges in her child’s death as the coroner works to confirm the baby’s cause of death. Canfield is accused of disposing of the infant, a girl, in a trash can outside a Redondo Beach residence where she was attending a party. According to authorities, Canfield complained of cramping and discomfort at the party, and later had the child there; blood was found in one of the rooms of the residence. Canfield reportedly told police she didn’t realize she was pregnant.
At around 9 a.m. on Wednesday, March 3, according to authorities, a trash collector was on his normal route when he found the dead baby inside a container which had been placed curbside for collection. Investigators quickly pieced together the case, learning that a party had taken place at the residence related to the garbage can, and contacting Canfield later that day at her sister’s Santa Barbara home, where she currently resides. She was arrested later that day and was in jail on $1 million bail prior to being released.
It is unclear whether Canfield will still face charges if the coroner determines the child was already deceased when it was discarded in the garbage. A DA’s spokesperson said they would not address hypothetical situations.


Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
OK, so she's a "person of interest" who came up with a million dollar bond. Is she claiming that the baby was stillborn and she should only be charged with littering?
confusedbystander (anonymous profile)
March 8, 2010 at 8:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)
How is this any different than getting an abortion?
Pinatubo (anonymous profile)
March 8, 2010 at 9:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Money talks.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
March 8, 2010 at 11:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)
she seems to not be out on bail so how does MONEY talk? az2sb.
surf2di4 (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2010 at 8:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Read the article again, especially the last sentence of the second to last paragraph. I accept your apology.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2010 at 8:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)
They were holding her on $1 million bail at first. However, since she now faces no charges she obviously didn't need to make bail to be released.
Reading comprehension talks. I accept your apology.
Pinatubo (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2010 at 10:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)
confused and AZ2SB once again get things wrong that are right there in black and white. Ms. Canfield of course never paid $1 million bail or any other amount, since there are currently no charges against her.
truth_machine (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2010 at 12:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)
@Pinatubo
This was apparently a natural birth and thus is pretty much the opposite of an abortion.
truth_machine (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2010 at 12:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Wouldn't the opposite of an abortion result in a living baby?
Pinatubo (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2010 at 2:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Ok, sorry to all concerned. That lady is still a cold piece of work no matter what the truth of this incident is.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2010 at 7:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The article was confusing.
Hey Indy, editing talks. I accept your apology.
Pinatubo (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2010 at 10:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Facts from the article:
1). Arrested March 3, and held in jail under a $1 million bail.
2). Released [no date] pending coroner's examination of dead baby.
3). Currently no charges.
4). Unclear whether Canfield will be charged.
Note: no apologies necessary.
binky (anonymous profile)
March 9, 2010 at 11:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm sorry.
Pinatubo (anonymous profile)
March 10, 2010 at 10:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)
We are in such a sorry state.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
March 10, 2010 at 10:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Even i the baby was stillborn, it deserved a proper burial and respect. Sadly, though, I fear the worst... that the poor baby was born alive and murdered.
sunnyday (anonymous profile)
March 11, 2010 at 11:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I hear that Jessie Canfield is free to go, without any charges to her name. No murder, no manslaughter, no child endangerment, not even littering. WHY ? She has left and gone back to 'MOMMY', out of state, to take care of her after all she's been through. I guess it must be nice to have a 'RESPONSIBLE MOMMY' that you can count on. Doesn't this make you SICK ! We all know if the baby weighed 6 lbs, IT WAS ALIVE ! SICK, SICK, SICK. May she be left in God's hands to charge her, since the authorities won't.
Ritarmolina (anonymous profile)
March 24, 2010 at 8:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Ok, Everyone. Even if she went out of state, murder is still a federal crime. The state can call on the FBI to arrest her. Then she can face the music. She should still be charged with the unlawful disposing of a corpse whether or not the baby was born alive. Obviously, the Los Angeles district attorney has chosen not to charge her at this time. They are still waiting, going on week 4. Needless to say, this chick has some major issues.
Egotistical (anonymous profile)
March 30, 2010 at 10:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)