A Santa Barbara Superior Court jury today found Denise D’Sant Angelo guilty of stealing $2,800 that local donors had intended to help three nuns find housing.
After the verdict was read shortly following lunch, Judge Jean Dandona ordered D’Sant Angelo, who had been free on bail, remanded to custody. She faces an April 22 sentencing hearing at 8:30 a.m. While D’Sant Angelo appeared to have prepared herself to be taken into custody, her two grown children — present during the verdict hearing — had trouble composing themselves and seemed shocked and confused when she was placed in handcuffs.
D’Sant Angelo also faces an April 12 hearing on felony elder abuse charges that she cheated Cecilia and Bobby Sanchez while claiming to assist them in financial dealings involving their home.
In the nuns’ case, prosecutor Brian Cota charged that D’Sant Angelo inserted herself into a 2007 community effort formed to aid three Sisters of Bethany who were being forced from their long-time convent on Santa Barbara’s Eastside. Instead, Cota charged, she pocketed $2,800 from the fund and used the money for her own purposes.
D’Sant Angelo’s attorney, public defender Jeff Chambliss, argued that his client had acted in good faith but was “confused” about how to handle money collected from donors. “The jury has spoken,” he said after the verdict. “It was a good, long trial, and we respect their decision.”
The nuns were evicted on short notice from the convent by the Los Angeles Archdiocese so proceeds could help pay damage suits filed by victims of priests. The building was later razed as part of expansion plans for the adjacent Our Lady of Guadalupe Church. The parish paid a sum to the archdiocese, in an amount that was never revealed. The nuns have left Santa Barbara but one, Sister Angela Escalera, returned to testify at the trial.
Chambliss said D’Sant Angelo faces a maximum of three years in state prison for her felony grand theft conviction, but that she would be released after serving half that time, due to California Department of Corrections (CDC) protocol. Should she avoid prison, Chambliss said, she would likely be put on probation for six or seven years. Prior to her sentencing, D’Sant Angelo will be referred to the probation department, which will take into account statements from her, Chambliss, Cota, and her victims.
Related Links
Barney Brantingham can be reached at barney@independent.com or (805) 965-5205, Ext. 230. He writes online columns and a print column on Thursdays



Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
Comments
Share Article
Myspace





Previous Month



Comments
Even the full three years seems short for a person like this. If she does end up in prison you can guarantee that her short sentence will become shorter becuase of cuts. Her crimes make her the ideal candidate. We should return to the practice of tar and feathering people.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
March 26, 2010 at 4:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Well, maybe not tar and feathering, but why the heck can't people just serve the term they get sentenced to? Isn't that a revolutionary idea?
Considering her crime, I find particular irony in her last name, though, I have to admit.
Native1 (anonymous profile)
March 26, 2010 at 5:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
You want to see irony; check out this guy's name:
http://www.11alive.com/rss/rss_story....
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
March 26, 2010 at 5:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Looking forward to her next hearing on elder abuse. I never heard of stating "confusion" as a defense before. Hope she gets more than a slap in the wrist in that one.
bajamama (anonymous profile)
March 26, 2010 at 6:01 p.m. (Suggest removal)
AZ2SB - that's incredible! I knew a guy who molested someone in school and his first name was Chester. Now that was an unfortunate instant-nickname. But this guy takes the cake! He may as well have been wearing a sign!!
Native1 (anonymous profile)
March 27, 2010 at 9:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Let's hope she gets years and years of probation after she's released from prison on this conviction.
And let's also hope that she gets more time and more probation after being convicted on the elder abuse charges!
This woman is one of those individuals who lies compulsively and has absolutely no conscience.
mangomamma (anonymous profile)
March 27, 2010 at 3:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I would hope there would be a requirement for her to make full restitution to the victim(s) as well.
LegendaryYeti (anonymous profile)
March 27, 2010 at 10:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
There probably will be restitution to victims, but knowing this type of person she will work the system whichever way she can and not pay it. Or at least not with her money.
AZ2SB (anonymous profile)
March 28, 2010 at 2:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)
While I'm angry about D'Sant Angelo's criminal behavior, I'm equally angry that prominent members of our community didn't step up to the plate to help the nuns. Local billionaires such as Wendy McCaw, Ty Warner, and Oprah Winfrey could easily have kicked in enough dough to buy the nuns another house!
buckwheat (anonymous profile)
March 29, 2010 at 5:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Billionaires aren't under any obligation to step in and help everybody, especially if there isn't any personal interests involved. Why do you presume billionaires should always step in and bail out peoples shortcomings?
pinkbutterfly (anonymous profile)
March 27, 2011 at 3:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)